Legal News

Microsoft’s Xbox Did Not Violate Google’s Patent
Download PDF

On Friday, in a preliminary decision, an administrative law judge at the International Trade Commission held that while making its popular Xbox, Microsoft Corp did not violate a patent owned by Motorola Mobility, which is now a Google subsidiary. A final decision on the matter is expected in July.

In 2010, Motorola Mobility had accused Microsoft of infringing five of its patents in the making of Xbox. Complaints about four of those patents have since been dropped. The fifth seems destined to perish, after Friday’s decision by the ITC.

The remaining complaint concerns a patent that allows wireless communication between devices which are only a small distance apart from each other. The battle over the Xbox console also has its implications on similar Motorola/Google claims in the smartphone patent wars currently waging between Google, Apple and Microsoft and involving Android platform users like Samsung.


Commenting on the ruling, David Howard, corporate vice president and deputy general counsel of Microsoft emailed a statement observing, “We are pleased with the administrative law judge’s finding that Microsoft did not violate Motorola’s patent and are confident that this determination will be affirmed by the commission.”

However, Google spokesman Matt Kallman stated in an email, “We are disappointed with today’s determination and look forward to the full commission’s review” indicating Google would fight to the end.

Things are far from over, as in April 2012, ITC Judge David Shaw had made a preliminary finding that Microsoft had in fact infringed four patents and did not infringe a fifth. But without deciding on the ruling, the ITC sent back the matter for reconsideration.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Later a number of claims of patent infringement were dropped by Google following an antitrust settlement with federal regulators and Google promised the Federal Trade Commission that it would refrain from asking sales bans based on the infringement of essential patents.





Search Now

Attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience


Chicago office of our client seeks attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience. The candidate s...

Apply Now

Defense Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks defense attorney with 3-4 years of solid litigation experie...

Apply Now

Mid-level IP Litigation Attorney with electrical engineering experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level intellectual property attorney with 3-5 years of ...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now


Attorney - Personal Injury

USA-NY-Great Neck

A well-known prestigious plaintiff’s personal injury law firm is seeking an organized, smart, ...

Apply now

Southern Poverty Law Center’s Southeast Immigrant Freedom Initiative (SIFI)


Overview: The Southeast Immigrant Freedom Initiative (SIFI) provides high-quality, holistic pro b...

Apply now

Researcher / Policy Analyst - Children's Rights


Overview: This position could be located in one of several SPLC offices, depending on personal ci...

Apply now

Attorney NJ/NY

USA-NY-New York City

A premier plaintiff\'s personal injury law firm seeks a high-energy Associate experienced in litigat...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top