Legal News

South Dakota Woman Wins $3.35 mln Jury Award over J&J’s Vaginal Mesh
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, the first jury verdict, among close to 1,800 vaginal mesh cases brought against Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson in New Jersey, was given. The jury held the Johnson & Johnson must pay Linda Gross, 47, of Watertown, South Dakota, a sum of $3.35 million for failing to warn her doctor adequately about the potential dangers of a vaginal mesh implant by Ethicon.

The jury also found that J&J had made several misrepresentations in its product brochures.

The lawsuit filed by Linda Gross in the state Superior Court in Atlantic City, New Jersey, had alleged that the Gyncare Prolift vaginal mesh was unsafe and that J&J and Ethicon were liable for “their defective design, manufacture, warnings and instructions,” among other things.

  
What
Where


The Ethicon product was taken off the U.S. market last year. Gyncare Prolift vaginal meshes had been promoted for treating pelvic organ collapse. The plaintiff had been treated for the same condition.

The pelvic organ collapse condition occurs when pelvic tissue forces its way into the vagina, usually after menopause, childbirth, or hysterectomy. A severe form of urinary incontinence was also treated by implanting the vaginal mesh.

Gross had installed a Gyncare Prolift for pelvic prolapsed, but soon after, faced a variety of problems, including extensive neurologic damages to structures and tissue and also faced other problems like mesh erosion, inflammation, and scar tissue.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




According to the plaintiff, she required 18 subsequent operations to repair the damage caused by J&J’s vaginal mesh.

The jury, consisting of a panel of six women and three men, took their decision following a six-week trial of the case before Judge Carol Higbee. The judge has ruled that she would allow the parties to argue on punitive damages.



J&J’s reputation continues to take a beating with this ruling coming almost back to back of the company having recalled its defective artificial hips.



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney

USA-WI-Oconomowoc

Oconomowoc general practice firm seeks an Associate Attorney. We specialize in estate planning, prob...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-TX-Addison

Experienced paralegal needed in active law firm commercial real estate practice:    ...

Apply now

Litigation Law Clerk

USA-VA-Alexandria

Old Towne Associates, P.C. (Alexandria, VA) Litigation Law Clerk Openings - Class of 2021 an...

Apply now

Northern California Litigation Family Law Attorney

USA-CA-Sacramento

Ready for a new opportunity in the world of family law? Cordell & Cordell may be a great fit for you...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Insurance and Civil Defense Litigation Attorney

USA-NJ-Fairfield

Fairfield office of our client seeks insurance and civil defense litigation attorney with 3-7 years ...

Apply Now

Civil Litigation / Insurance Defense Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks civil litigation / insurance def...

Apply Now

Real Estate Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks associate attorney with 2 years of experience in real estat...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top