Legal News

South Dakota Woman Wins $3.35 mln Jury Award over J&J’s Vaginal Mesh
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, the first jury verdict, among close to 1,800 vaginal mesh cases brought against Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson in New Jersey, was given. The jury held the Johnson & Johnson must pay Linda Gross, 47, of Watertown, South Dakota, a sum of $3.35 million for failing to warn her doctor adequately about the potential dangers of a vaginal mesh implant by Ethicon.

The jury also found that J&J had made several misrepresentations in its product brochures.

The lawsuit filed by Linda Gross in the state Superior Court in Atlantic City, New Jersey, had alleged that the Gyncare Prolift vaginal mesh was unsafe and that J&J and Ethicon were liable for “their defective design, manufacture, warnings and instructions,” among other things.

  
What
Where


The Ethicon product was taken off the U.S. market last year. Gyncare Prolift vaginal meshes had been promoted for treating pelvic organ collapse. The plaintiff had been treated for the same condition.

The pelvic organ collapse condition occurs when pelvic tissue forces its way into the vagina, usually after menopause, childbirth, or hysterectomy. A severe form of urinary incontinence was also treated by implanting the vaginal mesh.

Gross had installed a Gyncare Prolift for pelvic prolapsed, but soon after, faced a variety of problems, including extensive neurologic damages to structures and tissue and also faced other problems like mesh erosion, inflammation, and scar tissue.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




According to the plaintiff, she required 18 subsequent operations to repair the damage caused by J&J’s vaginal mesh.

The jury, consisting of a panel of six women and three men, took their decision following a six-week trial of the case before Judge Carol Higbee. The judge has ruled that she would allow the parties to argue on punitive damages.



J&J’s reputation continues to take a beating with this ruling coming almost back to back of the company having recalled its defective artificial hips.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Complex Commercial Disputes Associate Attorney

USA-WI-Green Bay

Green Bay office of an AmLaw firm seeks Complex Commercial Disputes Associate Attorney with 1 year o...

Apply Now

Patent Agent with 1 year of chemistry experience

USA-CA-Palo Alto

Palo Alto office of our client seeks entry-level patent agent with 1 year of experience. The candida...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Paralegal

USA-OH-Columbus

Law Office of Dmitriy Borshchak is actively seeking a qualified Paralegal to join their team in Colu...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-TX-Houston

Established law firm seeking an experienced civil / plaintiff litigation paralegal capable of answer...

Apply now

Contract Attorney

USA-TX-San Antonio

Business litigation and transaction firm located in Downtown San Antonio is seeking a contract attor...

Apply now

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-GA-Marietta

Come and join the team of Farmer Farmer & Brown Law Firm! We are looking for an experienced bilingua...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top