Home

Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Dismiss Proposed Class Action Suit by Former Dewey Employees
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, Judge Glenn at the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan, denied the motion of the Dewey estate to dismiss a proposed class action seeking to represent about 450 former employees of the law firm.

While the lawsuit by Victoria Conn, a former employee of the law firm’s document production department alleged that she and 450 similarly situated employees had lost their jobs without due notice under the WARN Act, Dewey argued it was not an “operating business” at the time of the layoffs.

Dewey’s stance was that only businesses that fit the description of “operating businesses” under the WARN Act, were bound by the mandatory notification periods to provide due warning to employees before layoffs.

  
What
Where


However, Judge Glenn said the point raised by Dewey was significant, and could not be decided at a summary judgment proceeding.

While Conn alleged that Dewey owed her and other employees full pay for 60 days, the Dewey estate argued that allowing such a case to proceed would put the interests of the class member’s ahead of the creditors.

Judge Glenn held that the proposed class action can proceed as an adversary proceeding in the Dewey bankruptcy, since there were numerous instances where WARN Act claims were allowed to proceed during a bankruptcy case, and often as class actions. He also cited precedents of the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan where such action had been allowed.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, Glenn did not rule on the merits and said “(Dewey) argues that it was no longer operating in an ordinary business sense when it laid off its employees … such issues of fact cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss.”

A next hearing has been scheduled for March 28 to hear arguments from both sides on the class action status of the matter.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney

USA-CA-Westlake Village

Small, congenial, well-established Westlake Village, CA, law firm seeking attorney with minimum 10+ ...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-MS-Tupelo

Position Lancaster Law Firm is seeking a full-time legal assistant. The firm assists its clients, p...

Apply now

Part-Time Estate Planning and Elder Law Paralegal

USA-MI-New Baltimore

Chawla Legal Group is looking for an experienced paralegal to help expand into the worlds of probate...

Apply now

FAMILY LAW ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY

USA-FL-Tampa

Seeking a Family Law Associate Attorney with minimum 3-5 years experience in Family Law.  Candi...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-SC-North Charleston

North Charleston office of our client seeks real estate attorney with experience. The candidate will...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Corona

Corona office of our client seeks senior family law litigation attorney with 10+ years of experience...

Apply Now

Transactional Attorney

USA-IA-Iowa City

Iowa City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks transactional attorney with 2+ y...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top