Home

Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Dismiss Proposed Class Action Suit by Former Dewey Employees
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, Judge Glenn at the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan, denied the motion of the Dewey estate to dismiss a proposed class action seeking to represent about 450 former employees of the law firm.

While the lawsuit by Victoria Conn, a former employee of the law firm’s document production department alleged that she and 450 similarly situated employees had lost their jobs without due notice under the WARN Act, Dewey argued it was not an “operating business” at the time of the layoffs.

Dewey’s stance was that only businesses that fit the description of “operating businesses” under the WARN Act, were bound by the mandatory notification periods to provide due warning to employees before layoffs.

  
What
Where


However, Judge Glenn said the point raised by Dewey was significant, and could not be decided at a summary judgment proceeding.

While Conn alleged that Dewey owed her and other employees full pay for 60 days, the Dewey estate argued that allowing such a case to proceed would put the interests of the class member’s ahead of the creditors.

Judge Glenn held that the proposed class action can proceed as an adversary proceeding in the Dewey bankruptcy, since there were numerous instances where WARN Act claims were allowed to proceed during a bankruptcy case, and often as class actions. He also cited precedents of the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan where such action had been allowed.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, Glenn did not rule on the merits and said “(Dewey) argues that it was no longer operating in an ordinary business sense when it laid off its employees … such issues of fact cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss.”

A next hearing has been scheduled for March 28 to hear arguments from both sides on the class action status of the matter.





 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Transactional Attorney with 4-12 years of leasing experience

USA-CA-Orange

Irvine office of our client seeks real estate transactional attorney with 4-12 years of experience. ...

Apply Now

Complex Litigation Attorney with 3-5 years of arbitration experience

USA-FL-Miami

Miami office of our client seeks complex litigation attorney with 3-5 years of law firm experience i...

Apply Now

Senior Business & Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

Irvine office is seeking a business and commercial litigation attorney with 5+ years of experience. ...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Trademark & Business Law Associate | Burlington, Vermont

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC (DRM) is seeking an Associate attorney with 1-3 years of trademark and tra...

Apply now

Patent Assistant (Patent Prosecution)

USA-DC-Washington

We have an immediate opening for a Patent Assistant to join our team!  The Patent Assistant pro...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Secretary

USA-CA-Solana Beach

Job Description and Qualifications : Paralegal / Legal Secretary - Duties will include preparat...

Apply now

Legal Secretary / Paralegal

USA-NY-Pearl River

Busy fast paced Rockland County Matrimonial firm seeking full time experienced family law paralegal ...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top