Legal News

Federal Court Stops IRS from Regulating Nonprofessional Tax Preparers
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted nonprofessional tax preparers a permanent injunction stopping the 2011 IRS tax return preparer regulatory program in its tracks.

The regulatory program had been launched by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to regulate the thousands of non-professional tax return preparers, but the injunction raises questions about the multi-million dollar enforcement program and its future.

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, who stepped down in November, had called for the IRS effort to weed out tax preparation fraud. The regulations launched by Shulman requires tax preparers to register with the IRS under the provisions of the IRS Return Preparer Initiative, which started in 2011.

  
What
Where


The regulations also required tax return preparers, in particular those without professional credentials, to sit for competency tests and classes to maintain their registration with the IRS. President Obama’s fiscal 2013 budget has already awarded federal contracts for the program, which requested $35 million from the Congress.

The new ruling could affect up to 700,000 tax return preparers in the country.

In March 2012, the Institute for Justice, along with three independent tax preparers challenged the legal authority of the IRS initiative, and alleged that the IRS was enforcing the regulations without required approval from the Congress. But the IRS said that a law dating from 1884 provided it the authority.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, while issuing the permanent injunction, the federal court observed, “With an invalid regulatory regime on the IRS’s side of the scale and a threat to plaintiff’s livelihood on the other, the balance of hardships tips strongly in favor of plaintiffs.”

The case is Sabina Loving, et al, v. Internal Revenue Service, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 12-cv-385.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-WY-Laramie

Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Intellectual Property Legal Assistant

USA-TX-San Antonio

Full Time IP Legal Assistant. Our firm specializes in Intellectual Property Law so knowledge of pate...

Apply now

Practice Management Assistant / Litigation Paralegal

USA-LA-Baton Rouge

Interesting and challenging small law firm seeking practice management / litigation parale...

Apply now

Estate Planning Attorney

USA-CO-Denver

Minimum five years of experience in estate planning and estate administration. J.D. required. Job...

Apply now

Senior Matrimonial Attorney

USA-NY-Cedarhurst

Growing Long Island Law Firm in Cedarhurst, NY, seeks a full-time Senior Attorney with at least 10 y...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top