Legal News

Federal Court Stops IRS from Regulating Nonprofessional Tax Preparers
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted nonprofessional tax preparers a permanent injunction stopping the 2011 IRS tax return preparer regulatory program in its tracks.

The regulatory program had been launched by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to regulate the thousands of non-professional tax return preparers, but the injunction raises questions about the multi-million dollar enforcement program and its future.

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, who stepped down in November, had called for the IRS effort to weed out tax preparation fraud. The regulations launched by Shulman requires tax preparers to register with the IRS under the provisions of the IRS Return Preparer Initiative, which started in 2011.

  
What
Where


The regulations also required tax return preparers, in particular those without professional credentials, to sit for competency tests and classes to maintain their registration with the IRS. President Obama’s fiscal 2013 budget has already awarded federal contracts for the program, which requested $35 million from the Congress.

The new ruling could affect up to 700,000 tax return preparers in the country.

In March 2012, the Institute for Justice, along with three independent tax preparers challenged the legal authority of the IRS initiative, and alleged that the IRS was enforcing the regulations without required approval from the Congress. But the IRS said that a law dating from 1884 provided it the authority.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, while issuing the permanent injunction, the federal court observed, “With an invalid regulatory regime on the IRS’s side of the scale and a threat to plaintiff’s livelihood on the other, the balance of hardships tips strongly in favor of plaintiffs.”

The case is Sabina Loving, et al, v. Internal Revenue Service, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 12-cv-385.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney - $65,000 minimum to start (more for experience)

USA-FL-Saint Augustine Beach

ST. AUGUSTINE ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY Membership in Good Standing with Florida Bar and able to re...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Seeking a qualified Transactional Attorney with experience in litigation, covenant enforcement and c...

Apply now

Closing Attorney

USA-NC-Cherokee

The Uptown Law Firm is seeking Attorney to handle real estate transactions on a per-file basis throu...

Apply now

Corporate Attorney

USA-NJ-Fairfield

Full-Time or Part-Time Corporate Attorney We are a boutique corporate and commercial transactiona...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Maitland

Maitland office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2+ years of experience in def...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-NC-Charlotte

Charlotte office of our client seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of civil litigation. The cand...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney at Law

USA-NJ-Eatontown

Eatontown office of our client seeks litigation attorney at law with experience. The candidate shoul...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top