Home

Supreme Court to Hear Appeals of Chadbourne & Parke and Proskauer Rose in Allen Stanford Matter
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court accepted the appeals of law firms Chadbourne & Parke and Proskauer Rose rising from the decision of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in reviving cases against the law firms brought by victims of Allen Stanford. Victims of Stanford’s $7 billion Ponzi scheme had sued the New York based law firms as well as attorney Thomas Sjoblom, who worked at both the law firms.

The lawsuits claimed that Sjoblom, as well as Chadbourne & Parke, had obstructed a SEC probe into Stanford’s doings. The victims also sued insurance brokerage Wilis Group Holdings Plc for its role in the fraud committed by Stanford.

The defendants argued that SLUSA or the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act precluded state-law class actions involving issues in connection with the purchase or sale of covered securities. Siding with the defendants, in October 2011, Dallas federal judge David Godbey had ruled that the SLUSA preempted the state-law class action brought against the defendants by the victims of Stanford’s scheme.

  
What
Where


However, with the 5th U.S. Circuit reviving the cases, the law firms approached the U.S. Supreme Court in appeal. The law firms argue that lower courts are divided in their opinions in the issue, and that similar lawsuits in Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme had been barred by SLUSA.

Stanford is currently serving a 110-year prison sentence following the bust of his scheme involving the sale of certificates of deposit by his Antigua-based Stanford International Bank.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear the appeals in April.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The cases are Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice et al, U.S. Supreme Court. No. 12-79; Willis of Colorado Inc et al v. Troice et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-86; and Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-88.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Part-Time Legal Assistant

USA-OK-Edmond

QUALIFICATIONS Legal Assistant must be detail-oriented and possess excellent organizational, time...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-MO-Liberty

Kuhlman, Reddoch & Sullivan, a Liberty Mo law firm is seeking a Legal Administrative Assistant. Only...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Job details Salary Up to $100,000 a year Job Type Full-time Part-time Benefits ...

Apply now

Associate Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Beverly Hills

Growing Beverly Hills litigation law firm specializing in a variety of business, real estate, and em...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Commercial Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a commercial litigation associate a...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-TN-Memphis

Memphis office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top