Legal News

Virginia Senate Committee Votes to Block Repeal of Ultrasound Law
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Thursday, a committee controlled by Republicans in the Virginia State Senate voted by a count of 8-7 to block the efforts of the Democrats to repeal a new mandatory ultrasound law and set of regulations that would close abortion clinics in the state.

The same committee voted against an anti-abortion bill that would have prevented Medicaid from paying for abortions of low-income women for instances of severe fetal anomaly. Early on in 2012, Republicans in Virginia received criticism from around the country when they proposed a bill that would require women to undergo transvaginal ultrasounds prior to having an abortion. The bill was revised with the help of Governor Bob McDonnell to require external ultrasounds. That version of the bill was signed into law by McDonnell.


A bill was proposed by State Sen. Ralph Northam (D), the only physician in the senate, that would have repealed mandatory ultrasounds. He said that they violate the privacy and sanctity of doctor-patient relationships. “I am giving you the opportunity to right the wrong committed last year,” he told committee members on Thursday.

Agreeing with the concerns of Northam, The Medical Society of Virginia and the Virginia American College of Obstetricians testified to repeal the bill. The president for the Family Foundation of Virginia, Victoria Cobb, said during her testimony at the hearing that those who provide abortions ‘hide the picture’ of the ultrasound so the women do not have a chance to change their minds. She said that this increases profits.

The ultrasound law and abortion clinic regulations, called the Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP), were blocked in the vote by the Senate Health and Education Committee. The sponsor of the bill to repeal TRAP was State Senator Mark Herring, a Democrat. He said, “What [the committee] did was wrong. I think the votes today indicate that Republicans still have an extreme agenda, and they’re intent on reducing access to women’s health care.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Health Industry Advisory Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks health industry advisory associate attorney with 3-5 years of...

Apply Now


Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now



Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


Associate Attorney – 3 to 5 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney


Litigation Attorney   Dallas, TX One of Texas\' largest Personal Injury Law Firms se...

Apply now


To Top