Legal News

Virginia Senate Committee Votes to Block Repeal of Ultrasound Law
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Thursday, a committee controlled by Republicans in the Virginia State Senate voted by a count of 8-7 to block the efforts of the Democrats to repeal a new mandatory ultrasound law and set of regulations that would close abortion clinics in the state.

The same committee voted against an anti-abortion bill that would have prevented Medicaid from paying for abortions of low-income women for instances of severe fetal anomaly. Early on in 2012, Republicans in Virginia received criticism from around the country when they proposed a bill that would require women to undergo transvaginal ultrasounds prior to having an abortion. The bill was revised with the help of Governor Bob McDonnell to require external ultrasounds. That version of the bill was signed into law by McDonnell.


A bill was proposed by State Sen. Ralph Northam (D), the only physician in the senate, that would have repealed mandatory ultrasounds. He said that they violate the privacy and sanctity of doctor-patient relationships. “I am giving you the opportunity to right the wrong committed last year,” he told committee members on Thursday.

Agreeing with the concerns of Northam, The Medical Society of Virginia and the Virginia American College of Obstetricians testified to repeal the bill. The president for the Family Foundation of Virginia, Victoria Cobb, said during her testimony at the hearing that those who provide abortions ‘hide the picture’ of the ultrasound so the women do not have a chance to change their minds. She said that this increases profits.

The ultrasound law and abortion clinic regulations, called the Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP), were blocked in the vote by the Senate Health and Education Committee. The sponsor of the bill to repeal TRAP was State Senator Mark Herring, a Democrat. He said, “What [the committee] did was wrong. I think the votes today indicate that Republicans still have an extreme agenda, and they’re intent on reducing access to women’s health care.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience


Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business


McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with 4+ years of experience


Chicago office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with 4+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now


Litigation Associate (Junior to Mid-Level) - Medical Malpractice - Garden City, NY

USA-NY-Garden City

Defense firm seeking junior to mid-level associate for Garden City office to fill Medical Malpractic...

Apply now

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney Needed


Insurance Defense firm (with 15 attorneys in Suffolk and Mineola location), seeks attorneys with 5+ ...

Apply now



Lang, Richert & Patch a Fresno area AV-rated law firm located in the highly desirable Fig Garden Fin...

Apply now



INSURANCE DEFENSE / TRANSPORTATION LITIGATION Law firm located in North Houston seeking an associ...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top