Legal News

Jerry Sandusky Requests New Trial
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The lawyers for Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State assistant football coach convicted of multiple counts of child sex abuse, argued for a motion for a new trial on Thursday, according to CNN.

The conviction and sentencing hearings for Sandusky were presided over by Judge John Cleland, who also heard the arguments on Thursday at Centre County Court in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania. Judge Cleland did not issue a ruling immediately. The motion for a new trial asks the court to re-examine issues it ruled on in earlier judgments.

  
What
Where


Sandusky was sentenced to no less than 30 years and no more than 60 years in prison for abusing 10 boys over a 15-year span. Sandusky was sentenced back in October by Judge Cleland. Sandusky was facing the possibility of 400 years in prison with all of the convictions.

The lawyers for the former football coach argued that there was not enough evidence to convict him and the court did not permit them enough time to prep for the trial after being overrun with documents by the prosecution.

On Thursday, defense attorney Joe Amendola testified that he was not prepared for the trial. He also admitted that after he reviewed the documents following the trial, he did not find anything that would have made him operate in a different manner when it came to defending Sandusky.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The defense team for Sandusky also argued that some of the claims made against him were too broad and should have been dismissed from the case. Sandusky was convicted on 45 out of 48 sexual abuse counts by the jury.

“If you win on one of the appeal issues, everything probably falls,” Amendola said. “All we have to do is convince an appellate court that one of the issues we will raise is worthy of a reversal.”



Amendola has filed a motion to have the sentence against Sandusky reconsidered. Sandusky’s defense attorneys even tried to remove themselves from the case prior to the trial. They told Judge Cleland the day before jury selection that they did not feel prepared and it would be ‘unethical’ if they continued. Their request was denied by the judge.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Health Industry Advisory Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks health industry advisory associate attorney with 3-5 years of...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 3 to 5 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Litigation Attorney   Dallas, TX One of Texas\' largest Personal Injury Law Firms se...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top