Legal News

NY City Board of Education Had Discriminated against Blacks and Latinos
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood ruled that New York City’s Board of Education had discriminated against black and Latino teachers. The discrimination was found in the requirement to pass a standardized test to become licensed to teach in city schools. The test was not properly validated.

Though the ruling came in favour of the plaintiffs in a class action, and it allows the plaintiffs ways to evaluate whether the current version of the test still contains the invalid provisions used from 1996 to 2000, the judge decertified the class, because it was seeking back pay.

The decision to decertify the class followed the standard of review established in Wal Mart Stores Inc v Dukes which restricts the scope of plaintiffs to group together in class actions. However, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs, the ruling could allow hundreds of teachers to seek damages individually, or to group into classes that meet the requirements of class certification.

  
What
Where


The instant lawsuit was filed way back in 1996 by four teachers belonging to the African American, and Latino communities, who alleged that the testing practices of the NY State Education Department and those of the New York Board of Education were discriminatory.

The lawsuit had alleged that the tests were created in a manner so that white teachers qualified at a much higher rate than either blacks or Latinos. First time test takers from Latino and African American communities had a success rate less than 60 percent, but whites had a success rate of 90.25 percent.

The lawsuit had also claimed that about 8,000 to 15,000 teachers have suffered termination, demotion, or reduced pay and other losses due to their failure to pass the standardized tests.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




While giving his ruling, Wood opined that the class could be maintained intact for the purpose of seeking a court finding that the board violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Corporate Attorney

USA-NJ-Fairfield

Full-Time or Part-Time Corporate Attorney We are a boutique corporate and commercial transactiona...

Apply now

Staff Attorney

USA-ME-Augusta

LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY STAFF ATTORNEY POSITION LSE is a statewide non-profit organizat...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - $65,000 minimum to start (more for experience)

USA-FL-Saint Augustine Beach

ST. AUGUSTINE ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY Membership in Good Standing with Florida Bar and able to re...

Apply now

Helpline Attorney

USA-ME-Augusta

Helpline Attorney Position (fulltime) Legal Services for the Elderly, Augusta, Maine. LSE is ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Maitland

Maitland office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2+ years of experience in def...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-NC-Charlotte

Charlotte office of our client seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of civil litigation. The cand...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney at Law

USA-NJ-Eatontown

Eatontown office of our client seeks litigation attorney at law with experience. The candidate shoul...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top