Legal News

NY City Board of Education Had Discriminated against Blacks and Latinos
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood ruled that New York City’s Board of Education had discriminated against black and Latino teachers. The discrimination was found in the requirement to pass a standardized test to become licensed to teach in city schools. The test was not properly validated.

Though the ruling came in favour of the plaintiffs in a class action, and it allows the plaintiffs ways to evaluate whether the current version of the test still contains the invalid provisions used from 1996 to 2000, the judge decertified the class, because it was seeking back pay.

The decision to decertify the class followed the standard of review established in Wal Mart Stores Inc v Dukes which restricts the scope of plaintiffs to group together in class actions. However, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs, the ruling could allow hundreds of teachers to seek damages individually, or to group into classes that meet the requirements of class certification.

  
What
Where


The instant lawsuit was filed way back in 1996 by four teachers belonging to the African American, and Latino communities, who alleged that the testing practices of the NY State Education Department and those of the New York Board of Education were discriminatory.

The lawsuit had alleged that the tests were created in a manner so that white teachers qualified at a much higher rate than either blacks or Latinos. First time test takers from Latino and African American communities had a success rate less than 60 percent, but whites had a success rate of 90.25 percent.

The lawsuit had also claimed that about 8,000 to 15,000 teachers have suffered termination, demotion, or reduced pay and other losses due to their failure to pass the standardized tests.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




While giving his ruling, Wood opined that the class could be maintained intact for the purpose of seeking a court finding that the board violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-WY-Laramie

Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Novato

Attorneys helping people........Brayton Purcell LLP is an extremely busy plaintiff\'s litigation pra...

Apply now

Casualty Attorney II

USA-CA-Irvine

Kuluva, Armijo & Garcia is seeking an experienced and skilled California litigator for the position ...

Apply now

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-FL-Tavares

Tavares boutique and growing law firm is looking for a full-time legal assistant / paralegal to work...

Apply now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

Andrus Anderson LLP is a plaintiffs’ firm in San Francisco looking for a full-time associate w...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top