Breaking News

Former General Motors Employee and Husband Guilty of Stealing Trade Secrets
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, a trial in the U.S. District Court in Detroit, found Shanshan Du, 53, and her husband Yu Qin, 51, guilty of conspiring to possess trade secrets without authorization, and also guilty of two counts of unauthorized possession of trade secrets. Shanshan Du, the former GM employee was found not guilty in three counts of wire fraud, but her husband was found guilty on all six counts, and additionally a seventh count for obstructing justice.

The trial began on Nov. 5, while the case was sent to the jury of nine women and three men on Thursday. Du and Qin were charged in 2010 for trying to steal trade secrets related to hybrid vehicles from General Motors with the intent to pass them on to China’s Chery Automobile Co through a small firm named Millennium Technology International, which was owned by the couple.

Du worked as an engineer in General Motors. In January 2005, she was offered a severance agreement by GM, and within the following five days she copied thousands of company documents to an external hard drive. She left the advanced technology group of General Motors in March 2005. In August 2005, a series of email documents showed Qin and Du proposing a joint venture on hybrids to China’s Chery Automobile.

  
What
Where


In November 2005, Qin, who was an electrical engineer in Troy, applied for jobs as a hybrid vehicle engineer, claiming to have invented some of the stolen GM technology on his resume.

Attorneys defending both Du and Qi maintained that the documents in question were not trade secrets. However, the couple were ordered to surrender their U.S. passports and ordered not to leave the Detroit area without court permission.

Sentencing in the case is scheduled in February 2013, and if the conviction is upheld then the trade secret counts can result in up to 10 years of imprisonment and $250,000 in fines. Wire fraud counts and obstruction charges carry a maximum penalty of 20 years each along with a fine up to $250,000.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is In re: U.S. v. Qin, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, No. 10-cr-20454





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney

USA-CA-Westlake Village

Small, congenial, well-established Westlake Village, CA, law firm seeking attorney with minimum 10+ ...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-MS-Tupelo

Position Lancaster Law Firm is seeking a full-time legal assistant. The firm assists its clients, p...

Apply now

Part-Time Estate Planning and Elder Law Paralegal

USA-MI-New Baltimore

Chawla Legal Group is looking for an experienced paralegal to help expand into the worlds of probate...

Apply now

FAMILY LAW ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY

USA-FL-Tampa

Seeking a Family Law Associate Attorney with minimum 3-5 years experience in Family Law.  Candi...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-SC-North Charleston

North Charleston office of our client seeks real estate attorney with experience. The candidate will...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Corona

Corona office of our client seeks senior family law litigation attorney with 10+ years of experience...

Apply Now

Transactional Attorney

USA-IA-Iowa City

Iowa City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks transactional attorney with 2+ y...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top