Legal News

JPMorgan and Credit Suisse Settle U.S. Civil Charges for $417 Million
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Regulators said on Friday that JPMorgan Chase & Co and Credit Suisse Group AG will be paying a combined $416.9 million to settle charges against them for misleading investors over the sale of high-risk mortgage bonds. Credit Suisse will pay $120 million and JPMorgan $296.9 million to settle separate cases over essentially same charges. The SEC said the harmed investors would be the beneficiaries.

Both the banks in their separate settlements said that they were happy to settle without admitting any wrongdoing.

In a statement, Robert Khuzami, the SEC enforcement chief said, “Misrepresentations in connection with the creation and sale of mortgage securities contributed greatly to the tremendous losses suffered by investors once the U.S. housing market collapsed.” The cases were brought over pre-recession sales of RMBs or risky mortgage-backed securities.


The SEC enforcement chief also pointed to the role of such financial wrongdoing in bringing about the recession. Khuzami said, “In many ways, mortgage products such as RMBS were ground zero in the financial crisis.”

While the settlements do not lay charges at the feet of any individual, in a conference call with reporters, Khuzami said, “We by no means are shying away from charging individuals where we can identify them as being responsible.”

In the instant cases the SEC had accused JPMorgan of misleading and concealing material information related to the quality of home loans it backed by a $1.8 billion RMBS. JPMorgan chase had represented to investors that only four loans were delinquent by 30 to 59 days, while, in fact, at least 620 loans or 7 percent of the total RMBS was delinquent. Investors lost about $37 million as a result of the misrepresentation.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The SEC said that the modus operandi of Credit Suisse had been similar to that of JPMorgan and the Swiss bank to had misled investors by making false claims.

The cases are SEC v. JPMorgan Securities LLC et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 12-01862; and In re: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 3-15098.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business


McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Employment Attorney with 3+ years of wage and hour litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks employment attorney with 3+ years of experience in wage and h...

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with some experience


Marlton office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with experience. A prior judicial ...

Apply Now


Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT


Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington


Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Trademark & Business Law Associate | Burlington, Vermont


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC (DRM) is seeking an Associate attorney with 1-3 years of trademark and tra...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top