Paul Hastings Sued by Laid off Legal Staff
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

It was recently reported by Reuters that two secretaries laid off in August have filed separate lawsuits against Paul Hastings in the Los Angeles Superior Court claiming age discrimination. One of the lawsuits mentioned, “the real reason plaintiff was ‘laid off’ was because she was an older worker earning and costing the defendant law firm too much.” Apparently, each complainant is seeking more than $1 million in damages.

A spokesman for Paul Hastings, Allan Whitescarver, said that the complainants, Anne Hollingsworth and Shawnda Foster, where two of the three legal staff let go in August from the law firm’s Los Angeles office as a part of a drive to eliminate positions.

Whitescarver said, “We never make decisions to eliminate positions with any discriminatory conduct.” He admitted that the law firm has been trying to reduce its number of legal secretaries over the last few years, while shifting more investment to technological advancement – a strategy meant to increase the organization’s efficiency.


The phenomenon of reducing legal staff coupled with growth in technology is of course not new and has been a favorite strategy of law firms seeking to reduce overhead and liabilities during the recession and post-recession markets. According to a study by the Citi Private Bank, the ratio of non-legal staff to lawyers in big law firms stood at 1.03 in 2007, but by 2011, the ratio had dropped to 0.9 legal staff per lawyer.

One of the complainants, Hollingsworth, 66, mentioned in her complaint that she had worked at Paul Hastings for 25 years before being fired.

On the other hand, the other complainant, Shawnda Foster, 49, added racial discrimination on top of age discrimination in her complaint. Foster mentioned that she was the only black secretary on her floor for a number of years, and that she was laid off while a less-qualified white secretary was retained.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The cases are Hollingsworth v. Paul Hastings and Foster v. Paul Hastings, Los Angeles Superior Court, Nos. BC493962 and BC493963.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Eminent Domain Attorney


Richmond office of our client seeks eminent domain attorney with 5+ years of experience. The candida...

Apply Now


Corporate Attorney

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking a mid-level attorney to join the corporate transactional department, a dynam...

Apply now

Labor, Employment, and Education Attorney

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking an experienced attorney to focus on all aspects of counseling and litigation...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now



Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now


To Top