Legal News

Supreme Court in a Dilemma over Government Liability in Credit Reporting
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

While the decision over the matter is expected in June, what took place on Tuesday at the U.S. Supreme Court over the federal government’s liability under the law in printing confidential credit card information on a customer’s receipt seems to bode ill for the government side.

The issue was raised when Bormes, a lawyer, filed a lawsuit in Illinois on behalf of a client and paid a filing fee of $350 using the federal government’s pay.gov gateway with his personal credit card. He found the receipts for the transaction contained the expiration date of his card, which is a violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act. The FCRA was created to protect customer privacy and combat identity theft, as also to provide accurate credit reporting.

Bornes filed a lawsuit claiming class-action status noting that the definition of a ‘person’ who may be sued under the FCRA also included “government” by implication. He filed the lawsuit on behalf of people who had received receipts from the federal government payment systems showing their card expiration dates or more than the last five digits of card numbers.

  
What
Where


The government claimed sovereign immunity, but in November 2010, a federal appeals court allowed the case to proceed under provisions of the Tucker Act, a law that allowed money claims against the government.

On Tuesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told the lawyer for Bornes, “If you’re right about this, the consequences are enormous for the federal fisc.”

Though, Sri Srinivasan, the Deputy Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the federal government that the appeals court had erred and the FCRA does not signify an “unequivocal expression” of the government waiving its immunity, his argument seemed tenuous.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Chief Justice John Roberts opined that reading the two acts together puts the government on the wrong foot. He said, though the “FCRA does not specifically address the liability of the United States … The Tucker Act does.”

Bornes’ lawyer, John Jacobs said, since truncated disclosures on card receipts were mandated by the Congress to combat widespread identity theft, it made no sense for the Congress to have intended shielding the government in such requirements. He said, “In terms of protecting the public, you wouldn’t want to exclude such a large thing.”



However, Justice Elena Kagan asked Jacobs whether it would be right to abandon the traditional assumption of government immunity unless it is specifically removed by conduct of the government or by words of the statute. She said, “You’re asking us to flip the presumption from now on.”

The case is U.S. v. Bormes, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 11-192.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business

USA-VA-McLean

McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Employment Attorney with 3+ years of wage and hour litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks employment attorney with 3+ years of experience in wage and h...

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with some experience

USA-NJ-Marlton

Marlton office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with experience. A prior judicial ...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH

USA-NH-Lebanon

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Trademark & Business Law Associate | Burlington, Vermont

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC (DRM) is seeking an Associate attorney with 1-3 years of trademark and tra...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top