Legal News

Which Class is Benefitting the Facebook “Beacon” Class Action Settlement?
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of Facebook Inc.’s $9.5 million class action settlement regarding violations of member data privacy through the now defunct “Beacon” service. However, the single dissenting judge, Andrew Kleinfeld expressed strong doubts about the settlement and held that the settlement actually, and unfairly, benefitted Facebook and plaintiff attorneys.

Without mincing words, Judge Kleinfeld said the settlement “perverts the class action into a device for depriving victims of remedies … Facebook users who had suffered damages from past exposure of their purchases got no money, not a nickel, from the defendants.” On the other hand, he noted, the settlement enriched both the company and plaintiff lawyers.

Brushing aside Kleinfeld’s dissent and questions the two judges in majority focused on the benchmark of the total sum proposed in the settlement, and not on who was getting the money. Roughly, $3 million has been set aside as attorney fees out of the $9.5 million, and the rest would be given to establish a charitable group focused on researching and maintaining online privacy rights. The people whose data rights were violated, and who led by 19 plaintiffs, sued as a class, would receive nothing.

  
What
Where


Focusing on the question of the amount of the settlement as more important, the court observed, “A $9.5 million class recovery would be substantial under most circumstances … and we see nothing about this particular settlement that undermines the district court’s conclusion that it was substantial in this case.”

The class action arose out of allegations over data privacy by Facebook’s use of the “Beacon” service launched in 2007. Facebook used the service to broadcast the internet activities of users to their Facebook friends without requiring affirmative consent of any user to participate in the program. Being assailed by complaints and negative publicity, ultimately Facebook discontinued the practice.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Ginger McCall vs. Facebook Inc., 10-16380

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!






 

RELEVANT JOBS

Legal Secretary

USA-LA-New Orleans

A New Orleans litigation law firm is seeking an experienced Legal Assistant / Legal Secretary to und...

Apply now

Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney

USA-TX-Fort Worth

We are currently looking for a consumer Bankruptcy Attorney to join our team. This position is respo...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-TN-Knoxville

London & Amburn, PC is located in downtown Knoxville, Tennessee near the Hilton Hotel. London & A...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-NE-Bellevue

Paralegal Big Fire Law & Policy Group LLP is seeking an experienced Paralegal to join our Firm. ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Civil Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Tampa

Tampa office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Civil Litigation Associate Attorney ...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-MI-Livonia

Livonia office of our client seeks Associate Attorney with 2 years of complex civil litigation exper...

Apply Now

Senior Litigation Partner

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks Senior Litigation Partner with 38 years of experience. The ...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top