Legal News

Which Class is Benefitting the Facebook “Beacon” Class Action Settlement?
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of Facebook Inc.’s $9.5 million class action settlement regarding violations of member data privacy through the now defunct “Beacon” service. However, the single dissenting judge, Andrew Kleinfeld expressed strong doubts about the settlement and held that the settlement actually, and unfairly, benefitted Facebook and plaintiff attorneys.

Without mincing words, Judge Kleinfeld said the settlement “perverts the class action into a device for depriving victims of remedies … Facebook users who had suffered damages from past exposure of their purchases got no money, not a nickel, from the defendants.” On the other hand, he noted, the settlement enriched both the company and plaintiff lawyers.

Brushing aside Kleinfeld’s dissent and questions the two judges in majority focused on the benchmark of the total sum proposed in the settlement, and not on who was getting the money. Roughly, $3 million has been set aside as attorney fees out of the $9.5 million, and the rest would be given to establish a charitable group focused on researching and maintaining online privacy rights. The people whose data rights were violated, and who led by 19 plaintiffs, sued as a class, would receive nothing.

  
What
Where


Focusing on the question of the amount of the settlement as more important, the court observed, “A $9.5 million class recovery would be substantial under most circumstances … and we see nothing about this particular settlement that undermines the district court’s conclusion that it was substantial in this case.”

The class action arose out of allegations over data privacy by Facebook’s use of the “Beacon” service launched in 2007. Facebook used the service to broadcast the internet activities of users to their Facebook friends without requiring affirmative consent of any user to participate in the program. Being assailed by complaints and negative publicity, ultimately Facebook discontinued the practice.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Ginger McCall vs. Facebook Inc., 10-16380

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!






 

RELEVANT JOBS

Law Clerk

USA-DC-Washington

C2 ALASKA, LLC Washington, DC   The Law Clerk II Journeyman- Division of Enforcem...

Apply now

Director of Administration

USA-VA-Arlington

Director of Administration (Communications/Litigation/Transactional Law Firm) Fletcher, Heald...

Apply now

Legal Executive Assistant

USA-VA-Arlington

Legal Executive Assistant (Communications/Copyright/Litigation)   Fletcher, Heald & Hi...

Apply now

Department Chairperson, Law Center

USA-FL-Miami

Miami Dade College, Wolfson Campus is now accepting applications for the Department Chairperson...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Attorney

USA-FL-Jacksonville

Jacksonville office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an attorney with 4-20 years o...

Apply Now

General Liability Associate Attorney

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks general liability associate attorn...

Apply Now

Wealth Planning Senior Associate/Of Counsel

USA-NV-Reno

Reno office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks wealth planning senior associate/of c...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top