Legal News

Which Class is Benefitting the Facebook “Beacon” Class Action Settlement?
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals ruled 2-1 in favor of Facebook Inc.’s $9.5 million class action settlement regarding violations of member data privacy through the now defunct “Beacon” service. However, the single dissenting judge, Andrew Kleinfeld expressed strong doubts about the settlement and held that the settlement actually, and unfairly, benefitted Facebook and plaintiff attorneys.

Without mincing words, Judge Kleinfeld said the settlement “perverts the class action into a device for depriving victims of remedies … Facebook users who had suffered damages from past exposure of their purchases got no money, not a nickel, from the defendants.” On the other hand, he noted, the settlement enriched both the company and plaintiff lawyers.

Brushing aside Kleinfeld’s dissent and questions the two judges in majority focused on the benchmark of the total sum proposed in the settlement, and not on who was getting the money. Roughly, $3 million has been set aside as attorney fees out of the $9.5 million, and the rest would be given to establish a charitable group focused on researching and maintaining online privacy rights. The people whose data rights were violated, and who led by 19 plaintiffs, sued as a class, would receive nothing.

  
What
Where


Focusing on the question of the amount of the settlement as more important, the court observed, “A $9.5 million class recovery would be substantial under most circumstances … and we see nothing about this particular settlement that undermines the district court’s conclusion that it was substantial in this case.”

The class action arose out of allegations over data privacy by Facebook’s use of the “Beacon” service launched in 2007. Facebook used the service to broadcast the internet activities of users to their Facebook friends without requiring affirmative consent of any user to participate in the program. Being assailed by complaints and negative publicity, ultimately Facebook discontinued the practice.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Ginger McCall vs. Facebook Inc., 10-16380

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!






 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-WY-Laramie

Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Intellectual Property Legal Assistant

USA-TX-San Antonio

Full Time IP Legal Assistant. Our firm specializes in Intellectual Property Law so knowledge of pate...

Apply now

Practice Management Assistant / Litigation Paralegal

USA-LA-Baton Rouge

Interesting and challenging small law firm seeking practice management / litigation parale...

Apply now

Estate Planning Attorney

USA-CO-Denver

Minimum five years of experience in estate planning and estate administration. J.D. required. Job...

Apply now

Senior Matrimonial Attorney

USA-NY-Cedarhurst

Growing Long Island Law Firm in Cedarhurst, NY, seeks a full-time Senior Attorney with at least 10 y...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top