Home

$10.6 Million Malpractice Judgment against Bryan Cave Vacated by Split Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Tuesday, the Appellate Division, First Department, New York reversed a jury verdict against law firm Bryan Cave that was to the tune of $10.6 million. The malpractice judgment was the result of protracted litigation between two former business partners in an apparel company.

The 3-2 panel clarified that two parties to a “fully litigated” arbitration could not sign a later agreement limiting the estoppel impact of the arbitration regarding claims against third parties. The majority held that such later agreement of estoppel could be allowed only where the arbitration was not fully litigated.

The malpractice claim against Bryan Cave had been filed by businessman Herbert Feinberg in a dispute with his former partner Norman Katz. The dispute arose out of a buyout proposal made by Feinberg to Katz over Katz’s portion of the business, and the later findings by the accounting firm Mahoney Cohen Rashbart & Pockart which audited the 1995 accounts of the company, that the company’s 1996 financial statements overstated the value of the company by $10 million.

  
What
Where


Feinberg took the matter to arbitration in 1997 alleging fraud and seeking to rescind the agreement. But in 2000, an arbitrator found Feinberg did not rely on the 1995 financials audited by Mahoney Cohen, while making his purchase decision. Disgruntled, Feinberg sued Mahoney Cohen, but the lawsuit was dismissed due to estoppel. So, Feinberg sued Bryan Cave, the law firm representing Feinberg in the arbitration in 2003, for malpractice.

Feinberg claimed that Jerome Boros, who represented Feinberg at the time and worked for Bryan Cave, and the law firm, had failed to advise Feinberg that he had an option to enter into a post-arbitration agreement with Katz limiting the effects of estoppel in suits against third parties.

A jury awarded Feinberg $10.6 million in damages; however, the appeals court ruled the verdict was erroneous. Writing on behalf of the majority, Justice James Catterson observed, “The ability of parties to formulate their own contractual restrictions as to the estoppel effect of arbitration awards is not, in reality, a carved-out exception to normal collateral estoppel principles.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, while admitting Feinberg’s case for appeal in 2005, a different panel of the First Department had held otherwise and had noted that such post-arbitration agreements were valid. The present majority differentiated from the earlier ruling by holding that such post-arbitration agreements limiting the effects of estoppels against third parties were not valid in cases where the issues had been fully litigated.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Senior Corporate Counselor - Remote

USA-NY-New York City

We are an innovative, intent-driven company that believes in building the future and we are looking ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Coral Gables

Job details Salary $52,000 - $75,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for th...

Apply now

Director, Legal & Government Affairs

USA-FL-Lakeland

  Director, Legal & Government Affairs Lakeland, FL CLICK HERE TO APPLY JOB SUMMARY...

Apply now

Attorney 0-3 Years Experience

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

San Fernando Valley Defense Firm seeks attorney with 0-3 years of workers\' compensation experience....

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior to Mid-level Investment Management Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks junior to mid-level investme...

Apply Now

Mid-level Debt Finance Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks mid-level debt finance-focus...

Apply Now

Senior Business and Corporate Law Attorney

USA-CA-Murrieta

Murrieta office of our client seeks a senior business and corporate law attorney with 3+ years of bu...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top