Home

$10.6 Million Malpractice Judgment against Bryan Cave Vacated by Split Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Tuesday, the Appellate Division, First Department, New York reversed a jury verdict against law firm Bryan Cave that was to the tune of $10.6 million. The malpractice judgment was the result of protracted litigation between two former business partners in an apparel company.

The 3-2 panel clarified that two parties to a “fully litigated” arbitration could not sign a later agreement limiting the estoppel impact of the arbitration regarding claims against third parties. The majority held that such later agreement of estoppel could be allowed only where the arbitration was not fully litigated.

The malpractice claim against Bryan Cave had been filed by businessman Herbert Feinberg in a dispute with his former partner Norman Katz. The dispute arose out of a buyout proposal made by Feinberg to Katz over Katz’s portion of the business, and the later findings by the accounting firm Mahoney Cohen Rashbart & Pockart which audited the 1995 accounts of the company, that the company’s 1996 financial statements overstated the value of the company by $10 million.

  
What
Where


Feinberg took the matter to arbitration in 1997 alleging fraud and seeking to rescind the agreement. But in 2000, an arbitrator found Feinberg did not rely on the 1995 financials audited by Mahoney Cohen, while making his purchase decision. Disgruntled, Feinberg sued Mahoney Cohen, but the lawsuit was dismissed due to estoppel. So, Feinberg sued Bryan Cave, the law firm representing Feinberg in the arbitration in 2003, for malpractice.

Feinberg claimed that Jerome Boros, who represented Feinberg at the time and worked for Bryan Cave, and the law firm, had failed to advise Feinberg that he had an option to enter into a post-arbitration agreement with Katz limiting the effects of estoppel in suits against third parties.

A jury awarded Feinberg $10.6 million in damages; however, the appeals court ruled the verdict was erroneous. Writing on behalf of the majority, Justice James Catterson observed, “The ability of parties to formulate their own contractual restrictions as to the estoppel effect of arbitration awards is not, in reality, a carved-out exception to normal collateral estoppel principles.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, while admitting Feinberg’s case for appeal in 2005, a different panel of the First Department had held otherwise and had noted that such post-arbitration agreements were valid. The present majority differentiated from the earlier ruling by holding that such post-arbitration agreements limiting the effects of estoppels against third parties were not valid in cases where the issues had been fully litigated.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience

USA-CA-Oakland

Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business

USA-VA-McLean

McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with 4+ years of experience

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with 4+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate (Junior to Mid-Level) - Medical Malpractice - Garden City, NY

USA-NY-Garden City

Defense firm seeking junior to mid-level associate for Garden City office to fill Medical Malpractic...

Apply now

CIVIL LITIGATION ATTORNEY - Employment

USA-CA-Fresno

Lang, Richert & Patch a Fresno area AV-rated law firm located in the highly desirable Fig Garden Fin...

Apply now

ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY

USA-TX-Houston

INSURANCE DEFENSE / TRANSPORTATION LITIGATION Law firm located in North Houston seeking an associ...

Apply now

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

Summary: The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Ho...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top