Legal News

Rabbis Critical of New York’s Proposed Law on Circumcision
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Ultra-Orthodox rabbis in New York are up in arms against a proposed law in New York that would require parental consent for circumcision rituals done in the orthodox manner. The ritual, called, metzitzah b’peh, involves a mohel removing the foreskin of the infant and using his mouth to stop the bleeding.

According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, at least 11 infants in New York are thought to have contracted herpes from the practice, two died, while two have irreversible brain damage. Though most modern mohels remove the blood with a sterile pipette, ultra-orthodox Jews of the Hasidic community still use the oral suction method.

The Department of Health contends that since 2004 it has received “multiple complaints from parents who were not aware that direct oral suction was going to be performed as part of their sons’ circumcisions.” But the Hasidic believe that the 5000-year old ritual is safe.


The Department of Health intends to vote on a proposal this September on a law that would require mohels to explain the oral suction method, inform of the possible transmission of herpes simplex virus, and obtain parental consent by the signing of a waiver.

However, Rabbi David Neiderman, executive director of the United Jewish Organization of Williamsburg points out that the ritual is performed safely “tens of thousands of times a year” worldwide, and babies who are not circumcised can also contract herpes from other sources. According to Niederman, the research linking the ritual to infant deaths is “full of holes.” He said, “We are convinced that the data is flawed and there’s no risk whatsoever.” He also added, “safeguarding the life of an infant” is one of the most important principles of the Torah.

Neiderman is worried that the vote to enact the law for compelling mohels to obtain parental consent for the traditional ritual may force the rabbis to put their religious beliefs first. He says, “When it comes to the law, we are all there – it’s our obligation, according to our religion. But not when the law goes against our religion.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience


Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business


McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with 4+ years of experience


Chicago office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with 4+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now


Litigation Associate (Junior to Mid-Level) - Medical Malpractice - Garden City, NY

USA-NY-Garden City

Defense firm seeking junior to mid-level associate for Garden City office to fill Medical Malpractic...

Apply now



Lang, Richert & Patch a Fresno area AV-rated law firm located in the highly desirable Fig Garden Fin...

Apply now



INSURANCE DEFENSE / TRANSPORTATION LITIGATION Law firm located in North Houston seeking an associ...

Apply now

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

Summary: The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Ho...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top