Legal News

Rabbis Critical of New York’s Proposed Law on Circumcision
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Ultra-Orthodox rabbis in New York are up in arms against a proposed law in New York that would require parental consent for circumcision rituals done in the orthodox manner. The ritual, called, metzitzah b’peh, involves a mohel removing the foreskin of the infant and using his mouth to stop the bleeding.

According to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, at least 11 infants in New York are thought to have contracted herpes from the practice, two died, while two have irreversible brain damage. Though most modern mohels remove the blood with a sterile pipette, ultra-orthodox Jews of the Hasidic community still use the oral suction method.

The Department of Health contends that since 2004 it has received “multiple complaints from parents who were not aware that direct oral suction was going to be performed as part of their sons’ circumcisions.” But the Hasidic believe that the 5000-year old ritual is safe.


The Department of Health intends to vote on a proposal this September on a law that would require mohels to explain the oral suction method, inform of the possible transmission of herpes simplex virus, and obtain parental consent by the signing of a waiver.

However, Rabbi David Neiderman, executive director of the United Jewish Organization of Williamsburg points out that the ritual is performed safely “tens of thousands of times a year” worldwide, and babies who are not circumcised can also contract herpes from other sources. According to Niederman, the research linking the ritual to infant deaths is “full of holes.” He said, “We are convinced that the data is flawed and there’s no risk whatsoever.” He also added, “safeguarding the life of an infant” is one of the most important principles of the Torah.

Neiderman is worried that the vote to enact the law for compelling mohels to obtain parental consent for the traditional ritual may force the rabbis to put their religious beliefs first. He says, “When it comes to the law, we are all there – it’s our obligation, according to our religion. But not when the law goes against our religion.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney


Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now


Legal Assistant - Estate Planning / Tax

USA-NC-Winston Salem

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC, seeks an experienced Corporate Legal Assistant to join its Winston-Sa...

Apply now

Contract Attorney



Apply now

Immigration Paralegal

USA-FL-Miami Gardens

$38,000 - $42,000 a year Prepare tables of contents with supporting evidence, fill out legal f...

Apply now

Commercial Litigation and Insurance Defense Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Kim Vaughan Lerner, a downtown Fort Lauderdale firm practicing in the areas of commercial litigation...

Apply now


To Top