Legal News

Southern Copper’s $2 bln Judgment Affirmed by Delaware Supreme Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Monday, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the $2 billion judgment awarded by a lower court to Southern Copper Corp which found the company had overpaid for an acquisition made from its controlling shareholder. The Delaware Supreme Court also affirmed a $304 million attorney fees award approved by the Court of Chancery to lawyers representing the plaintiffs.

The case sprung from the acquisition of Minera mexico from Grupo Mexico, which also controlled Southern Copper. In last October, Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine had found Southern Copper had overpaid $1.263 billion in the deal and ordered Grupo Mexico to repay the amount to Southern Copper. The Chancery Court also added interest to the damages, bringing the total to about $2 billion.

Grupo Mexico challenged the decision.


The Supreme Court rejected the argument of Grupo Mexico that the Chancery Court had overstepped its limits by refusing to modify the trial and accommodate a witness from Goldman Sachs Group, who had advised Southern Copper during the disputed deal.

The matter also drew criticism as it included the largest award of attorneys’ fee ever awarded by Delaware’s Court of Chancery, and made only a few months after Strine became the court’s first new chief judge in 14 years. The defendants criticized that the fee award amounted to $35000 an hour, which is more than 30 times of the rate in similar cases.

However, in its 110-page opinion, the Supreme Court observed that in determining a fee award the greatest importance should be placed on the value of the judgment and not upon other factors. However, Justice Carolyn Berger dissented on the part of the fee award and wrote that Strine had failed to apply the court’s “Sugarland” factors which take into account other variables such as actual time spent on a case and the complexity of the litigation.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

In dissent on the attorney fees, Berger wrote, “In sum, the trial court said that the fundamental test for reasonableness is whether the fee is setting a good incentive, and that the only basis for reducing the fee would be envy … That is not a decision based on Sugarland.”


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-CA-Menlo Park

Menlo Park office of sophisticated boutique firm is seeking a corporate attorney with experience in ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Computer Science Patent Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level patent attorney with 3-5 years of intellectual pr...

Apply Now


Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Executive Assistant / Office Administrator


If you have administrative support experience in the legal industry, or even paralegal expertise,...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group


Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now


To Top