Legal News

9th Circuit Rules Police Must Honor Ambiguous Requests for a Lawyer
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, a divided 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco found that homicide detectives should have stopped questioning a criminal suspect who said his father had advised him to ask for a lawyer. The court found that Tio Dinero Sessoms had sufficiently asserted his right to an attorney when he informed the detectives of his father’s advice. The ruling now requires police to honor even ambiguous requests for counsel made by a suspect before informing the suspect of his/her right to an attorney.

The instant case involves a home burglary committed in 1999 in Sacramento, California. During the burglary, one of Sessom’s accomplices committed a murder. Sessoms fled to Oklahoma, where his father urged him to surrender to the police.

A video recording of the interrogation following Sessom’s surrender shows Sessom saying, “There wouldn’t be any possible way that I could have a…a lawyer present while we do this? … My dad asked me to ask you guys…uh, give me a lawyer.”

  
What
Where


However, the homicide detectives told him that a lawyer would only hurt his case and bringing in a lawyer would be pointless as his accomplices had already divulged everything. After convincing him that asking for a lawyer was futile, the homicide detectives proceeded to read him his Miranda rights, which he waived and proceeded to implicate himself. He was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole.

Upon appeal, a California state appeals court, and a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit did not find any violation of Sessom’s right to a lawyer. The lower court and the three-judge panel, both held Sessom’s requests for a lawyer to be ambiguous. However, the 11-judge panel of the 9th Circuit disagreed 6-5.

Writing for the majority, Judge Betty Fletcher wrote, “Although it was couched in a polite and diffident manner, the meaning of Sessoms’s request was clear: he wanted a lawyer then and there.” The court also noted that suspects are held to a lower standard of clarity before they waive their Miranda rights.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Five judges dissented and held requests for an attorney must be unambiguous both before and after the Miranda rights warning. Judge Mary Murguia wrote in dissent, “A reasonable jurist could conclude that telling a detective ‘My dad told me to ask for a lawyer’ is different than saying ‘I want an attorney.”

The case was sent down for retrial or release of Sessom.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Principal, Board Governance Advisor

USA-CA-Newport Beach

 The Principal, Board Governance Advisor is responsible for supporting the Board of Directors o...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

LA based law firm with multinational practice seeks a Patent Prosecution / IP attorney. 2+ years of ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant I (USAO)

USA-VA-Alexandria

Duties and Responsibilities • provide a variety of direct legal support assistance to the C...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-LA-New Orleans

Greenbaum Breuer and Associates is a high-volume New Orleans, LA based firm that practices exclusive...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Associate Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney with 1 year...

Apply Now

Real Estate And Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Vero Beach

Vero Beach office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a real estate and commercial li...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorney ...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top