Legal News

Online Daters Find it Hard to Sue Match.com
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, a federal judge dismissed the major part of a lawsuit brought by online daters against online matchmaking service Match.com. U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay in Dallas ruled that Match.com had not violated its user agreements, and that the agreements did not require the online dating site to remove dormant or inaccurate profiles.

The Internet daters had argued that the company duped consumers into believing that it had millions of subscribers, when in fact, more than half of its user profiles were either inactive, fake, or created by scammers.

The judge wrote that the language of the agreements “in no way requires Match.com to police, vet, update the website content,” or require the company to verify the accuracy of user profiles. Jeffrey Norton, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said in an email, “we are reviewing the decision and considering our options.”

  
What
Where


The lawsuit had sought class-action status on behalf of subscribers to the online dating site and had been filed in 2010. The judge dismissed claims made by plaintiffs over breach of contract, and also asked the plaintiffs to explain why he should not dismiss the claims of deceptive trade practices brought under Texas law. The judge has given the plaintiffs until August 27 to submit their response, failing which that claim would also be dismissed.

Similar consumer lawsuits have also been brought against other dating sites previously. In 2007, Yahoo Inc settled a similar lawsuit for an amount of $ 4 million. The lawsuit had accused Yahoo of allowing fake profiles from people disinterested in dating.

A spokesman for Match.com said that the company had always maintained that the allegations against it were “unfounded.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Robinson, et al. V. Match.com, LLC, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 10-cv-02651





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Senior Corporate Counselor - Remote

USA-NY-New York City

We are an innovative, intent-driven company that believes in building the future and we are looking ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Coral Gables

Job details Salary $52,000 - $75,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for th...

Apply now

Director, Legal & Government Affairs

USA-FL-Lakeland

  Director, Legal & Government Affairs Lakeland, FL CLICK HERE TO APPLY JOB SUMMARY...

Apply now

Attorney 0-3 Years Experience

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

San Fernando Valley Defense Firm seeks attorney with 0-3 years of workers\' compensation experience....

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior to Mid-level Investment Management Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks junior to mid-level investme...

Apply Now

Mid-level Debt Finance Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks mid-level debt finance-focus...

Apply Now

Senior Business and Corporate Law Attorney

USA-CA-Murrieta

Murrieta office of our client seeks a senior business and corporate law attorney with 3+ years of bu...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top