Legal News

Court Rules Barriers at Polls Hindered Disabled Voters in New York
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Wednesday, a judge ruled that thousands of disabled voters faced “pervasive and recurring barriers” when trying to vote at poll sites in the city. U.S. District Judge Deborah Batts in Manhattan ordered the city’s Board of Elections to appear before her later this month to discuss possible remedies keeping in mind the presidential elections in November.

The ruling came after more than two years had passed following a lawsuit filed by two nonprofit organizations, which alleged that the city had failed to ensure proper access for disabled voters. The court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the groups and found that it was impossible for any reasonable jury to hold in favor of the election board in the matter.

In the lawsuit, the United Spinal Association and Disabled in Action groups had accused the city of failing to respond appropriately to the serious accessibility problems for physically disabled voters at numerous sites in the city. The lawsuit alleged that the city continued with the practice even after inspectors noted barriers during several primary and general elections.


The lawsuit also claimed that most poll sites within public schools do not meet the accessibility standards for the disabled. The court observed there was, “copious documentation of barriers at poll sites, ranging from ramps that are unsafe or missing to missing signage and improper placement of voting equipment and furniture in voting areas.”

The court also mentioned the instance of one Brooklyn voter, Denise McQuade, who began using absentee ballots because the ramp at her local site was too steep and dangerous for her wheelchair. The court also observed in the ruling that the U.S. Census Bureau estimates the existence of at least 500,000 New Yorkers with ambulatory difficulties and more than 145,000 with vision difficulties.

Disability Rights Advocates, the legal group that represented the two organizations, suggested assigning a specific on-site worker at each polling site to monitor accessibility. The idea was supported by the judge.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Julia Pinover, the lawyer who argued the case on behalf of the plaintiffs said, “This is a basic civil right that every American should have undeniably protected.”

The lawyer representing the city said he was “disappointed” by the ruling.

The case is United Spinal Association et al. v. Board of Elections in the City of New York et al., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-cv-5653.



Personal Injury Litigation Paralegal 1+ years EXP.


Plaintiff car & truck accident law firm seeking a PI paralegal. Must have excellent verbal and writt...

Apply now

Associate Family Law Attorney

USA-UT-Saint George

ASSOCIATE FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY OPENING available in growing law practice for associate family law at...

Apply now

Commercial Litigation Associate


Galleria Area based law firm providing services throughout Texas and Nationwide is immediately hirin...

Apply now

Legal Assistant


Legal Assistant The Legal Assistant will download and enter files into our computer program from ...

Apply now




Search Now

Senior Insurance Defense Litigation Associate Attorney


Decatur office of our client seeks senior associate attorney with 3-5 years of insurance defense lit...

Apply Now

Commercial Bankruptcy Attorney


Richmond office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks commercial bankruptcy attorney wi...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Phoenix office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3-5 years of insurance defense...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top