Legal News

7th Circuit Denies Class-action Status to Lawsuit by Black Construction Workers
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Wednesday, the 7th Circuit reversed a lower court decision and denied class-action status to a lawsuit filed against one of the nation’s largest builders by twelve black construction workers. In their lawsuit, the African-American workers alleged that the Walsh Construction Company discriminated against black construction workers in its employment practices. In March, U.S. District Judge Joan Lefkow allowed the case to proceed as a class action, however, the 7th Circuit held that in the instant case, the thousands of black employees sought to be represented had too many differences to justify grouping them together in a single suit.

The lawsuit, on behalf of thousands of black employees who had worked at the company’s construction sites in the Chicago area, accused the company of creating a hostile work environment where supervisors regularly used racial epithets and tolerated derogatory graffiti and hangman’s nooses that other workers left in the rest areas. The lawsuit also alleged that the company systematically denied overtime and other work opportunities to black construction workers.

The 7th Circuit decided that just being black construction workers and working for the same employer and being exposed to the same types of discretion did not justify clubbing them together as a class. There were too many differences.


However, the lower court distinguished the case from the precedent of the women’s discrimination case against Wal-Mart, because in her evaluation, in the Wal-Mart case there were actually too many differences to reconcile and recognize a class of 1.5 million workers. But in the instant case, things were more manageable since it involved only 262 construction sites and not the thousands of stores as in the case of Wal-Mart. The lower court judge took into account a previous 7th Circuit decision recognizing a class of 700 black brokers as a class discriminated against by America Corp’s Merrill Lynch Unit. In that case, the 7th Circuit distinguished from the Wal-Mart case because it held that the class of black brokers was more manageable than the millions of female workers in Wal-Mart.

The 7th Circuit observed that the lower court had misread its interpretation of the law and the question was not one of manageability as a class, but whether the workers had enough in common. Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote for the unanimous three-judge panel, “Wal-Mart tells us that local discretion cannot support a company-wide class no matter how cleverly lawyers may try to repackage local variability as uniformity.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!



Principal, Board Governance Advisor

USA-CA-Newport Beach

 The Principal, Board Governance Advisor is responsible for supporting the Board of Directors o...

Apply now


USA-CA-Los Angeles

LA based law firm with multinational practice seeks a Patent Prosecution / IP attorney. 2+ years of ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant I (USAO)


Duties and Responsibilities • provide a variety of direct legal support assistance to the C...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-LA-New Orleans

Greenbaum Breuer and Associates is a high-volume New Orleans, LA based firm that practices exclusive...

Apply now




Search Now

Associate Attorney


Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney with 1 year...

Apply Now

Real Estate And Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Vero Beach

Vero Beach office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a real estate and commercial li...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorney ...

Apply Now


To Top