Greenberg Traurig Trying to Settle Class-action Accusing Complicity in Ponzi Scheme
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

In a rare move for law firms, Greenberg Traurig and Quarles & Brady are trying an $88 million settlement of a class-action that accuses them of complicity in a $900 million Ponzi scheme. On Wednesday, Greenberg agreed to settle charges for $61 million and Quarles & Brady received preliminary approval for a settlement amount of $26.5 million. The approval was given by U.S. District Judge Frederick Matone in Phoenix.

Greenberg Traurig issued a statement saying, “While we have always stood behind the work we did in this matter, entering into this settlement is a sensible step for the firm.” Greenberg Traurig got embroiled in the matter while advising the now-defunct firm Mortgages Ltd. Quarles & Brady, was in for advising Radical Bunny, an investment firm which funded Mortgages Ltd. If the settlement submissions are finally approved by the court, then the class-action would end against the law firms.

In a statement, Quarles & Brady said that it “believes its conduct was at all times lawful and ethical.” However, it wanted to settle the case to avoid future expenses and uncertainty. The firm also maintained that neither the SEC nor the Arizona securities regulators had yet found any fault in the firm’s involvement in the matter.


Before its implosion, Arizona-based Mortgages Ltd used to make high-interest bridge loans to real estate developers. In its turn, Radical Bunny helped to obtain $197 million from investors to fund Mortgages Ltd. However, the class action alleges that Mortgages Ltd was already insolvent by 2005 and had been raising the money to fund the extravagant lifestyle of its CEO Scott Coles. Coles committed suicide in June 2008 and thereafter, the firm filed for bankruptcy. Radical Bunny also followed suit.

Investors sued Greenberg Traurig and Quarles & Brady, as they alleged the actions of the law firms as counsel to the Ponzi scheme organizers helped to deceive investors and allowed illegal sale of securities. Both the law firms continue to deny such allegations, but have filed to settle the class action for a cumulative sum of $88 million to avoid future uncertainties.

However, the lawyers for the plaintiffs are skeptical and maintain that approval of the settlements “would trigger a mass exodus of partners leaving the class members with a largely uncollectible paper judgment.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The case is Facciola v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, 10-cv-01025.



Family law attorney Westlake Village

USA-CA-Westlake Village

ZFLG is a boutique family law firm serving LA and Ventura Counties. We want to hire an experien...

Apply now

Personal Injury Attorney


CAREER OPPORTUNITY   The Quinn Law Group is looking for an exceptional candidate to join ...

Apply now

Criminal Law Attorney


AV rated criminal defense law firm seeking full time attorney with at least 1-3 years of experience ...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal


Litigation Paralegal Job Description   Mid-sized downtown Portland firm has an immediate ...

Apply now




Search Now

Mergers and Acquisitions Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Mergers and Acquisitions Associa...

Apply Now

Senior Wealth Management Group Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of our client seeks Senior Wealth Management Group Associate Attorney with 9 years ...

Apply Now

Bankruptcy Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Bankruptcy Associate Attorney ...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top