Legal News

Appeals Court Limits Liabilities of Board Members of Co-op Corporations
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Thursday, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed a lower court ruling dismissing a petition for injunction against several members of the board of directors of a residential society. The court held that in order to sue individual board members of a co-operative corporation, plaintiffs would need to show “independent tortuous acts” committed by such board members.

The court remarked, “As a general matter, courts are prohibited from inquiring into the propriety of actions taken by a director on behalf of the corporation.”

In the instant matter, Robert and Champa Weinreb sued the boards along with several individual board members after years of altercation over renovations to their apartment. The plaintiffs held that the board had blocked their plans of renovation unreasonably, and extensive renovations were required to make the apartment properly habitable.


However, the court held that the terms of the lease required the consent of the cooperative corporation and not the consent of its individual directors. Therefore, the claims could be aimed at the board, but not at the individual board members as many of them may not be there when the case is decided and relief, if any, is granted.

The lawyer on behalf of the individual board members, Steven Sladkus, said that the ruling would prevent plaintiffs from unfairly targeting individual board members.

Sladkus said, “This ruling helps continue the trend of the courts of New York State in making it more and more difficult to name board members ad defendants in lawsuits … from a legal point of view, if the corporation loses the case, the court can order the corporation to sign the forms. Then the corporation, by whoever is running it, would sign the forms. There’s no need to name them.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The case is Weinreb v. 37 Apts. Corp., Appellate Division, First Department, No. 7004.



Civil Litigation Case Manager

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Tenants Law Firm seeks to add a Case Manager to its Litigation team, which works on various housing ...

Apply now

Civil Litigation Paralegal

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Position Description: Tenants Law Firm seeks a paralegal to work with its Litigation team, which ...

Apply now

100% Remote Civil Litigation Attorney (Flexible Schedules)

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Tenants Law Firm is looking to hire experienced Civil Litigation ATTORNEYS to work 100% re...

Apply now



Galloway\'s Dallas Office is seeking a Paralegal. Tasks include but not limited to conducting p...

Apply now




Search Now

Venture Capital Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate business attorney with...

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks transactional real estate attorn...

Apply Now

Experienced Health Care Attorney


Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm is seeking health care attorney with 5-...

Apply Now


To Top