Legal News

7th Circuit Holds Pharma Sales Reps Not Entitled to Overtime
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled that pharmaceutical companies do not owe overtime pay to sales representatives. The decision can save billions of dollars for industry employers and lead to similar losses for sales representatives. In the case brought against Eli Lilly & Co and Abbott Laboratories, the court held that sales representatives have the same status as administrative employees and are therefore not entitled to overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The FLSA requires companies to pay for work done beyond forty hours a week, but does not include administrative employees and outside sales personnel. If the decision remains unchallenged or upheld during challenge then all sales representatives can be characterized as administrative employees and denied overtime. According to the law, administrative employees are expected to do work related to central business operations and have to exercise their own discretion.

The employees contended that the exemption in the case of administrative employees was intended to include only higher-level employees who exercise more discretion than simple sales representatives who only follow company directives and promote company products to doctors. However, the 7th circuit disagreed.

  
What
Where


The court held that “The representatives before us are the public face of their employer to the most important decision-maker regarding the use of their companies’ products, the prescribing physicians.”

The court found that sales representatives are not simply reciting company provided scripts but their work is administrative in nature.

The Department of Labor has filed amicus briefs in favor of the employees and hold that pharmaceutical sales representatives are neither ‘outside sales’ personnel nor ‘administrative employees.’ The new decision contradicts an earlier decision of the 2nd Circuit which holds that the nature of work carried out by sales employees does not attract the exemptions of ‘administrative employees’ or of ‘outside sales.’

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The cases before the 7th Circuit are Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Company, No. 10-3855; Jirak v. Abbott Laboratories Inc, Nos. 11-1980, 11-2131.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Staff Attorney

USA-VA-Fairfax

The Staff Attorney is responsible for managing the Fund’s delinquent contribution and withdraw...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Sugar Land

Civil Litigation Firm in Sugar Land, TX. is seeking an attorney with 2 - 5 years litigation exp...

Apply now

Second Year Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Sacramento

SECOND YEAR LITIGATION ATTORNEY   Cook Brown, LLP, a Sacramento boutique labor & employme...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - New Orleans

USA-LA-New Orleans

Slocumb Law Firm, LLC, is a national personal injury law firm. This is an excellent opportunity for ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Personal Injury Litigator

USA-VA-Fairfax

Northern Virginia office of our client is seeking a personal injury litigator with 4+ years of stron...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Larkspur

Larkspur office of our client seeks an associate attorney with 4-6 years of experience/background pr...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-MI-Bloomfield Hills

Bloomfield Hills office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney wit...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top