Legal News

Princeton Review Charged with Tutoring Fraud
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

U.S. prosecutors filed a civil fraud lawsuit on Tuesday against Princeton Review alleging that it had claimed millions of dollars in reimbursement for tutoring services that it did not provide in a federally funded program for children who were underprivileged. The lawsuit has also charged a former employee at the company which is well known form providing preparation guides and manuals for competitive examinations like the GRE, GMAT, and SAT.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that “The Princeton Review and its employees were supposed to tutor needy students, not cheat a federal program.”

The Princeton Review had a contract with the New York City Department of Education to provide after-school tutoring for underprivileged children and at underperforming schools. The length of the contract was for eight years, from 2002 to 2010.

  
What
Where


Using federal grant money, the city of New York paid the Princeton Review a rate of $35 to $75 per hour for tuitions that were never delivered. The lawsuit alleged that as a contract Supplemental Educational Services provider, Princeton Review managers and aides illegally billed the city by artificially inflating attendance sheets and charging tuition for students who never showed up.

Speaking on behalf of Princeton Review, Denise DesChenes, a company spokeswoman said that the employees involved in the alleged program were no longer with the company. Denise said, “The activity allegedly occurred within the company’s former Supplemental Educational Services division, which the company discontinued in 2010.”

Allegedly, New York paid the company $38 million between 2006 and 2010. The scam had gone so deep and the fraudsters so irreverent of authority, that the company, Princeton Review, once billed the city of New York for tutoring 74 students at a Bronx school on New Year’s Day, on which there was a holiday and no classes.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The lawsuit accused that Ana Azocar, the former Princeton Review site manager and director directly encouraged employees to falsify claims, and administrators received bonuses depending upon the attendance rates they produced on paper.

The case is U.S. v. The Princeton Review, Inc, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 09-6876.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Labor & Employment Associate

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP, an education law firm, has an immediate opening for an entry to mid-l...

Apply now

Business, Facilities, Real Estate, Construction & Energy Associate

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP, an education law firm, has an immediate opening for a Lateral Associa...

Apply now

Special Education Attorney (Oakland & Sacramento)

USA-CA-Oakland

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP, an education law firm, has an immediate opening for a Special Educati...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-MI-Bingham Farms

Excellent opportunity and compensation package for top notch attorney with 6+ years’ experienc...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Private Investment Funds Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Dallas office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks private investment funds associate ...

Apply Now

Software Patent Associate Attorney

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a software patent associate attorne...

Apply Now

Software Patent Agent

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a software patent agent. The candid...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top