Legal News

Supreme Court Seems Sympathetic to Arizona Illegal Immigration Laws
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The Supreme Court seems surprisingly sympathetic to Arizona’s side in the case of Arizona versus the United States of America, where the state’s exacting immigration laws are under question. The justices made many comments regarded Arizona’s right to protect its borders, though of the four controversial provisions to Arizona’s law, only one seemed favored: the law that arrested persons must provide papers that show they are legal citizens.

U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrelli is representing the U.S., and as is typical for him, got interrupted a lot. Verrilli at one point cited the “problem of harassment,” mentioning the 2 million Latinos who live in Arizona, of which only 400,000 are illegal, at which point Chief Justice Scalia cut him off —

“Sounds like racial profiling to me,” said Scalia. As there are already civil rights cases open challenging the law, the Supreme Court has made it clear that it is only considering the problem of Federal versus State jurisdiction.

  
What
Where


The question regards whether States have the right to enforce their own immigration laws, considering federal law handles illegal immigration.

Arizona’s highly criticized laws Arizona include the the right for police to arrest suspected illegal immigrants with no warrant and to keep them imprisoned until their citizen status is cleared up. The Justices seemed concerned about how long a suspected illegal immigrant could be detained.

Scalia sarcastically summed up the federal government’s argument as claiming “the state has no power to close its borders to people who have no right to be there.” Of its 370-mile border with Mexico, Arizona has struggled to keep immigrants out. Paul Clement, who is representing Arizona, said that the state:

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




“Bears a disproportionate share of the costs of illegal immigrants.”

Eight justices are presiding over the case, as Justice Elena Kagan has stepped aside, due to her previous work on this topic before becoming a Justice of the Supreme Court. A vote of 4-4 would uphold the ruling of the 9th Circuit’s court to block parts of the law. The Supreme Court is expected to make its decision on this matter by late June.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Experienced Litigation Attorney

USA-NY-White Plains

Experienced Litigation Attorney: Busy White Plains law firm seeks an experienced litigator with at l...

Apply now

Probate and Real Estate Paralegal

USA-FL-Boca Raton

Small boutique law firm seeking a paralegal for probate proceedings and transactional real estate cl...

Apply now

Insurance Defense Attorney

USA-PA-Blue Bell

Wright & O\'Donnell, P.C., is a well established law firm engaged in an aggressive defense litigatio...

Apply now

Paralegal / Primary Assistant

USA-CA-Manhattan Beach

Paralegal / Legal Assistant Please do not apply unless you have 3 years + in Family Law / Divorce o...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

SEC Attorney

USA-MA-Waltham

Waltham office of our client seeks SEC attorney with 3-5 years of experience to assist with all aspe...

Apply Now

Private Investment Funds Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Dallas office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks private investment funds associate ...

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks commercial litigation attorney...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top