Breaking News

Mitt Romney Says Poor Women Should be Required to Work Outside of Home
Download PDF

In January, Mitt Romney said that women who are poor and stay at home to raise children should be given federal assistance for child care so they would be able to join the work force and “have the dignity of work.” These comments by Romney undercut how upset he became last week when Hilary Rosen, a Democratic strategist, said that Ann Romney never ‘worked a day in her life.’

Romney made the following comments on Twitter in response to Rosen’s comments last week: “I made a choice to stay home and raise five boys. Believe me, it was hard work.”

Amanda Henneberg, a spokeswoman for Romney, said the following in an email to the Huffington Post on Sunday:


“Moving welfare recipients into work was one of the basic principles of the bipartisan welfare reform legislation that President Clinton signed into law. The sad fact is that under President Obama the poverty rate among women rose to 14.5 percent in 2011, the highest rate in 17 years. The Obama administration’s economic policies have been devastating to women and families.”

By reading into the January comments of Romney, he seems to view moms who stay at home on federal support much differently than those who stay at home and are supported by private income. Romney said that poor women should not have a choice and should be required to work outside the home in order to be eligible for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families benefits.

“[E]ven if you have a child 2 years of age, you need to go to work,” Romney said about moms who use TANF.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“I wanted to increase the work requirement,” said Romney. “I said, for instance, that even if you have a child 2 years of age, you need to go to work. And people said, ‘Well that’s heartless.’ And I said, ‘No, no, I’m willing to spend more giving day care to allow those parents to go back to work. It’ll cost the state more providing that daycare, but I want the individuals to have the dignity of work.'”

No matter how much dignity is involved, Ann Romney would not have met the requirements had she been on TANF benefits. When Romney ran a campaign for the Senate in 1994, which ended in failure, he said:

“This is a different world than it was in the 1960s when I was growing up, when you used to have Mom at home and Dad at work,” Romney said. “Now Mom and Dad both have to work whether they want to or not, and usually one of them has two jobs.”

1 Comment

  1. leslie johnson

    April 16, 2012 at 4:46 pm

    Mitt’s Millstone Dilemma (An Excerpt)
    Stephen Stone
    President, RenewAmerica

    …leave moral conservatives to shake their heads in amazement at the list of major Republican figures who’ve endorsed the establishment’s skid-greasing of the wholly-unacceptable Mr. Romney — whose chief qualification, from the get-go, has always been his exceptionally deep pockets (he reportedly spent $50 million of his own money when he ran in 2008), and his resulting ability to attract others with deep pockets in a mutual quest for power.

    In all honesty, how can any self-respecting, freedom-loving, Constitution-minded “conservative” endorse such a preposterous enterprise as the candidacy of Mitt Romney?

    Considering Mitt’s demonstrated lack of credibility, principle, and political accomplishment (one that rivals the pre-2008 record of Barack Obama), such “sell-out” by big-name conservatives is more than disconcerting. It makes us wonder if these influential public figures feel accountable — to the electorate, to our nation’s posterity, to our forebears, and to God Himself.

    Mitt Romney came out for abortion-on-demand, then signed into law pro-abortion policies; he endorsed the gay agenda and instituted same-sex marriage on his own in Massachusetts; and he helped create the economic, medical, and unconstitutional monstrosity known derisively as Obamneycare.

    You’re the voter — entrusted by God to vet and vote intelligently, with an eye to His Word and Will.

    Just keep asking yourself: How could any discerning person fall for Mitt?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

5 × 1 =


Most Popular


To Top