Home

Justice Breyer Defends References to Foreign Law
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Speaking at the School for Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University yesterday, Justice Breyer defended references to foreign law in Supreme Court decisions.  The sound bite being tossed around the blawgosphere today was when he said “I can read what I want”, but of course there was far more to his argument than that.  He went on to say “If I see something written by a man or a woman who has a job like mine in another country, and who is interpreting a document somewhat like mine and who in fact has a problem in front of the court somewhat like mine, why can’t I read it, see what they’ve done? I might learn something.”

There is no doubt that the courtrooms of Europe contain great thinkers who can offer us insights into the philosophical underpinnings of the law, even though the context differs.  Philosophy, whatever its source, helps understand meaning.  It gives us tools to interpret ideas and can help form a framework for discussion.  The Constitution itself was based on the philosophies of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau among others.  Justice Breyer made the point that foreign law is not controlling but that there is nothing wrong with learning what other legal scholars think about an issue.  It is right and proper that those who make momentous decisions that reverberate throughout our society reach for insight from as many sources as possible so long as the final decision is found within the framework of the Constitution.  But what Breyer didn’t address head on is the appropriateness of including those arguments in decisions issued by our own Court.

Is there a difference between quoting Plato, Socrates and Voltaire and citing a case from the European Court of Human Rights?  Justice Scalia certainly think so.  In his dissent in Lawrence v Texas, Scalia wrote “the court’s discussion of these foreign views …  is … meaningless dicta. Dangerous dicta, however, since this court should not impose foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans.”

  
What
Where




 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Partner level Attorney with food and drug experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of national firm is seeking partner or counsel level attorney (8-15 years) with...

Apply Now

Senior Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks Senior Litigation Associa...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks Mid-level Litigation At...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate

USA-IL-Chicago

Experience: 3-6 years Location: Chicago Loop Area of Practice: Commercial Litigatio...

Apply now

Senior Civil Litigation Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Description Smith Freed Eberhard is seeking an experienced civil litigation associate to join our...

Apply now

Senior Civil Litigation Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Description Smith Freed Eberhard is seeking an experienced civil litigation associate to joi...

Apply now

Litigation and Collections Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

The Rubin Law Firm seeks an attorney with litigation and dispute resolution experience to join its b...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top