Cravath Faces Conflict of Interest Suit in Takeover Bid
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Cravath, Swaine & Moore appears to be in the middle of a real dustup in the attempted takeover of Airgas by rival Air Products.

Cravath, which is representing Air Products in its $5.1 billion takeover bid, has been slapped with a conflict-of-interest suit by Air Gas because of work the firm has previously done with the company. However, Reuter is reporting Thursday that Cravath could be in the clear because its relationship with Air Products goes back at least 40 years.

As the story notes, courts “tend to frown on law firms that drop one client for a higher-paying one.” But Cravath’s long-established relationship with Air Products could alleviate the court’s concerns.


“The fact that Air Products is a long-standing client is one that weights in Cravath’s favor,” Georgetown University Law Center professor Milton Regan told Reuters. “It’s not as though they dropped Airgas to represent a new, lucrative client that just appeared on the scene.”

Cravath began working with Airgas in May 2001 and left in October 2009 when it got wind of Air Products’ pending offer. At issue now is to what was the extent of Cravath’s work for Airgas. Sources close to Air Products tells Reuters Cravath only provided minor financial work to Airgas and didn’t have access to proprietary information.

Airgas disagrees. In its lawsuit, the company claims Cravath had access to “intimate knowledge of Airgas’ operations, finances, executive personnel and their agenda, and corporate expansion and differentiation strategies.” Airgas also says Cravath provided counsel when Airgas’ president and chief operating officer left in 2005.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

It is not yet known where the conflict-of-interest case will be heard. It was filed in Pennsylvania state court and transferred to federal court in Philadelphia. Air Products wants it heard in Delaware while Airgas prefers the matter be heard in Philadelphia first.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Litigator with 5-10 years of general insurance defense experience

USA-FL-West Palm Beach

Boutique litigation firm is looking for an experienced litigator with 5-10 years of general insuranc...

Apply Now

Transactional Real Estate Attorney with 4-10 years of experience

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a transactional real estate attorney with 4-10 years of experience.

Apply Now

Real Estate/Business Transaction Attorney with 8+ years of experience


Seattle office is seeking a real estate & business transaction attorney with 8+ years of experience....

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance coverage experience


Towson office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of business, insurance coverage...

Apply Now


Contract Attorney

USA-CA-Beverly Hills

We are looking for a civil business litigator with 3+ years of experience who is capable of attendin...

Apply now


USA-CA-San Francisco

As an in-house legal counsel at Wix’s legal department, you will play a significant role in de...

Apply now

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney Needed


Defense Negligence firm with offices in Nassau County and main office in Suffolk County seeks a full...

Apply now


USA-MO-Kansas City

Successful, expanding KC personal injury law firm seeks an attorney with 5+ years personal injury li...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top