Cravath Faces Conflict of Interest Suit in Takeover Bid
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Cravath, Swaine & Moore appears to be in the middle of a real dustup in the attempted takeover of Airgas by rival Air Products.

Cravath, which is representing Air Products in its $5.1 billion takeover bid, has been slapped with a conflict-of-interest suit by Air Gas because of work the firm has previously done with the company. However, Reuter is reporting Thursday that Cravath could be in the clear because its relationship with Air Products goes back at least 40 years.

As the story notes, courts “tend to frown on law firms that drop one client for a higher-paying one.” But Cravath’s long-established relationship with Air Products could alleviate the court’s concerns.


“The fact that Air Products is a long-standing client is one that weights in Cravath’s favor,” Georgetown University Law Center professor Milton Regan told Reuters. “It’s not as though they dropped Airgas to represent a new, lucrative client that just appeared on the scene.”

Cravath began working with Airgas in May 2001 and left in October 2009 when it got wind of Air Products’ pending offer. At issue now is to what was the extent of Cravath’s work for Airgas. Sources close to Air Products tells Reuters Cravath only provided minor financial work to Airgas and didn’t have access to proprietary information.

Airgas disagrees. In its lawsuit, the company claims Cravath had access to “intimate knowledge of Airgas’ operations, finances, executive personnel and their agenda, and corporate expansion and differentiation strategies.” Airgas also says Cravath provided counsel when Airgas’ president and chief operating officer left in 2005.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

It is not yet known where the conflict-of-interest case will be heard. It was filed in Pennsylvania state court and transferred to federal court in Philadelphia. Air Products wants it heard in Delaware while Airgas prefers the matter be heard in Philadelphia first.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Matrimonial/Family Law Attorney


Walden office of our client seeks matrimonial/family law attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The ...

Apply Now

Matrimonial Attorney

USA-NY-Garden City South

Garden City South office of our client seeks matrimonial attorney with experience. The candidate wil...

Apply Now

Probate Litigation Attorney


Orlando office of our client seeks probate litigation attorney with 3+ years of experience.

Apply Now


Legal Department Manager


Acclaim Credit Technologies is seeking full time individual for our legal department. Job requiremen...

Apply now

Workers' Rights Coordinator Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal Workers\' Rights Coordinating Attorney   JOB ANNOUNCEMENT Posi...

Apply now

Senior Law Coordinator Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

SENIOR LAW COORDINATING ATTORNEY La Raza Centro Legal is currently accepting applications for a c...

Apply now

Immigration Law Coordinator Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

Immigration Program Coordinating Attorney The Immigration Program Coordinating Attorney at La Raz...

Apply now


To Top