Cravath Faces Conflict of Interest Suit in Takeover Bid
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Cravath, Swaine & Moore appears to be in the middle of a real dustup in the attempted takeover of Airgas by rival Air Products.

Cravath, which is representing Air Products in its $5.1 billion takeover bid, has been slapped with a conflict-of-interest suit by Air Gas because of work the firm has previously done with the company. However, Reuter is reporting Thursday that Cravath could be in the clear because its relationship with Air Products goes back at least 40 years.

As the story notes, courts “tend to frown on law firms that drop one client for a higher-paying one.” But Cravath’s long-established relationship with Air Products could alleviate the court’s concerns.


“The fact that Air Products is a long-standing client is one that weights in Cravath’s favor,” Georgetown University Law Center professor Milton Regan told Reuters. “It’s not as though they dropped Airgas to represent a new, lucrative client that just appeared on the scene.”

Cravath began working with Airgas in May 2001 and left in October 2009 when it got wind of Air Products’ pending offer. At issue now is to what was the extent of Cravath’s work for Airgas. Sources close to Air Products tells Reuters Cravath only provided minor financial work to Airgas and didn’t have access to proprietary information.

Airgas disagrees. In its lawsuit, the company claims Cravath had access to “intimate knowledge of Airgas’ operations, finances, executive personnel and their agenda, and corporate expansion and differentiation strategies.” Airgas also says Cravath provided counsel when Airgas’ president and chief operating officer left in 2005.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

It is not yet known where the conflict-of-interest case will be heard. It was filed in Pennsylvania state court and transferred to federal court in Philadelphia. Air Products wants it heard in Delaware while Airgas prefers the matter be heard in Philadelphia first.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney with motions experience


Seattle office of our client seeks mid-level litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience, inclu...

Apply Now

Environmental /Land Use Attorney with 2-3 years of experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks environmental /land use attorney with 2-3 years of experien...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance defense experience


Jacksonville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of previous insurance def...

Apply Now

Patent Litigation Attorney with 3-5 years of computer science experience


Chicago office of our client seeks patent litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The cand...

Apply Now




Boutique East Bay litigation defense firm is seeking a junior to mid-level attorney. Candidates for ...

Apply now

Family Law Paralegal


The right person for this job will grasp basic and complex divorce and family law issues, have stron...

Apply now

Products Liability & Mass Tort Litigation Associate


The candidate must have 1- 5 years of civil litigation experience, preferably with some background i...

Apply now

Paralegal - Insurance Defense


Downtown Insurance Defense Law Firm seeks an experienced paralegal with at least 3-5 year\'s experie...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top