Home

Judges to Lawyer: No “Right to Criticize Judges”
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Geoffrey FeigerMichigan attorney Geoffrey Fieger has lost his “right-to-criticize-judges” lawsuit in a federal appeals court.

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Fieger was not wrongfully punished for lambasting three judges on a 1999 radio show, when he called them “jackasses” and compared them to Nazis for overturning a $15 million verdict.

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that Fieger violated state rules of professional conduct with his “rude and vulgar” comments, and reinstated a formal reprimand against him.

  
What
Where


Fieger sued the Michigan Supreme Court over the state rules, which require lawyers to use “civility” when they criticize judges.

A federal district judge declared the rules overly broad and unconstitutional. The 6th Circuit overturned that decision, holding that Fieger can’t prove “actual present harm or a significant possibility of future harm based on a single, stipulated reprimand.

The Court emphasized that Fieger violated the rules, not because he criticized judges, but because he made vulgar, personally abusive comments about participants in a pending case.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




In a dissent, Judge Gilbert Merritt expressed skepticism about the rules for punishing misbehaving lawyers, holding the rules remain unclear about what is permissible or impermissible for lawyers to say about judges.

Fieger, a former lawyer for “suicide doctor” Jack Kevorkian, was the center of controversy last year over a series of television commercials he ran during his trial, in which he compared the Bush administration to Nazis, and claimed that trial lawyers were under attack from the federal government. A judge ordered Fieger to yank the ads after prosecutors complained he was trying to taint the jury pool.



Via NLJ.



 

RELEVANT JOBS

National Firm seeks seasoned Corporate M&A partner in Austin with Big Law experience

USA-TX-Austin

Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional (remote-workplace) law firms in the country...

Apply now

National Firm seeks seasoned Corporate M&A partner in Houston with Big Law experience

USA-TX-Houston

Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional (remote-workplace) law firms in the country...

Apply now

National Firm seeks seasoned Corporate M&A partner in Dallas with Big Law experience

USA-TX-Dallas

Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional (remote-workplace) law firms in the country...

Apply now

Trusts and Estates Paralegal

USA-PA-Philadelphia

We are looking for a paralegal with a 4-year degree and paralegal certificate, or equivalent experie...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 1+ y...

Apply Now

Civil Defense Litigation Attorney At Law

USA-MO-Olivette

Olivette office of our client seeks civil defense litigation attorney at law with 1-10 years of expe...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Law Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Walnut Creek

Walnut Creek office of our client seeks labor and employment law associate attorney with 5-7 years o...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top