<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; top law firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/top-law-firms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aostler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Overy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alston & bird llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arnold and porter llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker & McKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baker botts llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker Hostetler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bingham mccutchen llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan cave llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadwalader wickersham & taft llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cahill gordon & reindel llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chadbourne & parke llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clifford chance llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooley LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=32781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms survey asked attorneys about their experiences working for 94 different law firms. While the survey asked a variety of questions regarding associate life, vacation time, benefits, and firm demands, one of the more interesting components involved the salary and bonus assessment. What follows is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms survey asked attorneys about their experiences working for 94 different law firms. While the survey asked a variety of questions regarding associate life, vacation time, benefits, and firm demands, one of the more interesting components involved the salary and bonus assessment. What follows is a concise summary of the survey&#8217;s results with regards four separate areas: salary and bonus amounts for 2011; salary scale; the target bonus amounts for 2010; and the factors that go into determining bonuses for each firm.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table style="border: 1px solid #000000;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law Firm Name</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2011 Salary &amp; Bonuses</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Salary Scale</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2010 Target Bonus Level</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bonus Factors</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld have salaries that start at $160,000. The salary structure in Houston offices is a year behind market trends. Typically, the firm follows lock-step bonuses, even paying the New York market bonus in December 2010. Some associates also receive a $10,000 merit bonus based on number of hours worked.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,<br />
$10k,<br />
$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Allen &amp; Overy LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salary is $160,000. Salary and bonus systems are both &#8220;lockstep.&#8221; Billable hours have no bearing on bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Alston &amp; Bird LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">$160,000 starting salary for new associates. Merit considerations come into play when determining bonus amounts including billable hours. Top performers in first through fourth years can earn up to $25,000 extra. Top performers in fifth year + can earn up to $50,000 extra.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k,</p>
<p>$140k,</p>
<p>$145k,</p>
<p>$155k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Bonuses are 4%, 7.5%, or 12% of salary at the following billable hours markers: 1,900, 2,000, and 2,100.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Arnold &amp; Porter LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Arnold &amp; Porter uses lockstep salaries based on class year with a base starting at $160,000. Subjective factors and billable hours determine bonus amounts. 2010 bonuses were considered &#8220;above-market,&#8221; at $10,000 to $50,000 on average with a maximum of $70,000.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses including quality of work and work quality in relation to seniority. Qualifying factors are not transparent but the basics include: 1,800 billable hours and pro bono work.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker &amp; McKenzie </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">The Baker &amp; McKenzie firm has a lockstep salary system with some exceptions given for individuals based on performance. Starting salaries are $160,000 except for Miami offices, where it is $130,000. Bonus amounts are considered to be below market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker Botts L.L.P. </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary is merit-based at Baker Botts. The four salary categories are determined by number of years with the firm (1, 2-3, 4-6, and 7+), but seniority promotions are not automatic. Starting salary is $160,000.  Texas offices have the highest bonus incentives. Bonuses are paid in March. Federal District and Circuit Court clerkship bonuses are given in the amounts of $35,000 and $50,000 to Texan and non-Texan offices, respectively.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$185k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker Hostetler LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries fall between $115,000 and $160,000 then slip into a hybrid lockstep system than combines billable hours, performance, and other factors into consideration. Individual salaries do not always match market levels, nor do bonuses, which are largely discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">5% bonus administered after completing 1,950 hours. Additional 12.5% bonus is possible, though rare, and based on performance.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bingham McCutchen LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Bingham McCutchen follows a hybrid lockstep system that determines base salary levels. Starting salary is $160,000. Bonuses are at market level but not paid out until March. Judicial clerkship bonuses are also available.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,<br />
$170k,<br />
$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,<br />
$10k,<br />
$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bryan Cave LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary at Bryan Cave in coastal and Chicago offices is $145,000 for the first year, $150,000 for the second year, and $155,000 for the third year. Base salary is lower in all other offices. In general, compensation is determined by lockstep and merit-based factors. Bonuses are also tiered but it is unclear how much members will receive each year. Judicial clerkship bonuses are available in some cases.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent. Bonus tiers reside at 1,950, 2,100, 2,250, and 2,400 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft have a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 for all offices except Charlotte, which starts at $130,000. Spring bonuses in 2011 matched the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,<br />
$170k,<br />
$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though merit-based factors are only considered after 1,900 billable hours have been logged.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cahill offers a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 and stays consistent depending on the associate&#8217;s class. Bonuses were distributed in payments ranging between $15,000 to $20,000 in December 2010 and another at market scale in January 2011. Mid-year bonuses were also paid in June 2011 for $5,000 to $25,000.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Chadbourne &amp; Parke has a starting salary of $160,000 and bonuses that meet the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">A lockstep system is used for setting salaries at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &amp; Hamilton with a base of $160,000. They match market scale bonuses across the board.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are determined by class year of the associate.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Clifford Chance LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Clifford Chance uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses meet the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">The process by which bonuses are determined is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cooley LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cooley uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 and meet the market level. Bonuses usually meet the market scale but a lack of overall transparency makes it difficult to gauge average amounts.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Some of these factors are believed to include performance, client relationships, quality, and partnership potential, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Covington &amp; Burling</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Covington &amp; Burling use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses are lower than similar firms though the firm has a reputation for contributing to a better quality of life for its associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses though subjective factors may contribute like pro bono work, recruiting, involvement, performance, etc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. The firm sets and surpasses market bonus amounts for both end-of-year and spring bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Crowell &amp; Moring LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Crowell &amp; Moring use both a lockstep system and merit-based approach to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonus amounts vary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 billable hours must be logged for bonus eligibility.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. However, paychecks are only administered once a month. Bonuses match the market and came in at the top of the market for spring bonuses in 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Debevoise &amp; Plimpton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Debevoise &amp; Plimpton uss a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses matched market levels in 2009 and 2010, while their spring bonuses for 2011 came in at the top of the market on the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dechert LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dechert uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 in most markets and at $145,000 for Charlotte, Philadelphia, Princeton, and Hartford offices. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale for standard performance and were doubled for those who were extremely productive.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$152k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200K,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,950 billable hours nets a Cravath-level bonus. More hours increases this amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dewey &amp; LeBoeuf LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dewey &amp; LeBoeuf uses a lockstep system for determining salaries, which start at $160,000 and increase each year after that. Bonuses are in keeping with the Cravath scale, but are paid out in March or April.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Associates that billed 2,000 hours qualify for bonuses with additional bonuses available for high performance.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dickstein Shapiro LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dickstein Shapiro has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000. After that, salaries are below market level. By the third year, associates can work for higher hourly pay. Bonuses are paid out in December.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$165k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. After 2,100 hours, the bonus level increases every 100 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DLA Piper</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">DLA Piper has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000 in most markets and $145,000 in smaller markets.  A newer compensation structure features three tiers that are separated by 2-4 years and accession through the ranks is based on performance. 15% of the salary is awarded at the end of the year, based on a performance review. If no salary is withheld, bonuses are given.  Income and bonuses are generally viewed as below market levels. In previous years, bonuses ranged from $5,000 to $50,000. Top performers now receive market-level bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. An end of year performance review determines if associates receive their 15% withheld portion of their salary. A rating of 4 or 3 warrants this; a rating of 2 warrants a 5% payment; and a rating of 1 warrants no withheld salary or bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dorsey &amp; Whitney LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dorsey &amp; Whitney uses a merit-based compensation system. Starting salary is $145,000 in California and New York and $110,000 to $120,000 in smaller markets. Bonuses are behind market scale discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$110k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though they are mostly discretionary. They are not determined in a transparent way.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge have a lockstep system for starting salaries at $145,000 in New York and Boston and $125,000 in Providence. Senior associates have a range of salaries, determined by unclear means. 10% of salary relies on meeting the minimum billable hours. Bonuses are less than market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fenwick &amp; West LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries at Fenwich &amp; West are $160,000 at all offices. Bonuses are typically lower than market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,800 and 1,950 billable hour tracks are available for different salary and bonus potential.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fish &amp; Richardson P.C.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fish &amp; Richardson salaries are lockstep and start at $160,000. Bonuses ranged from $17,500 to above $50,000 in 2009 and even higher bonuses in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 nets a bonus with every additional 100 hours increasing this amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Foley &amp; Lardner LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Foley &amp; Lardner has a hybrid lockstep system with a tiered system for bonuses. Starting salary is $160,000 in major markets and between $110,000 and $145,000 in smaller markets. Deferred salary payment of $15,000 is made to those who work over 1,950 hours. Lockstep system dissolves after the fourth year. Bonuses vary and ranged from $0 to $50,000 in 2009.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent and largely discretionary.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer uses a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Non-U.S. offices moved to a milestone system in 2011 based on performance only. U.S. office bonuses follow market standards but actually came in at the top of the Cravath scale for spring bonuses in February 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &amp; Jacobson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &amp; Jacobson have a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses match market levels and reached up to $35,000 in 2009. Spring bonuses in 2011 matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. A minimum of 1,950 hours must be logged to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fulbright &amp; Jaworski L.L.P.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fulbright &amp; Jaworski have a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonus amounts vary but fall short of market standards.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Hourly bonuses are given to those that log 2,000 and above with additional amounts given to those every additional 100 hours. Discretionary bonuses are also awarded based on merit.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">A lockstep scale is used to determine salaries at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher, and start at $160,000. Bonus amounts are in line with market levels for year&#8217;s end and in the spring.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Logging over 1,950 qualifies associates for bonuses. Higher billable hours increase bonus amounts considerably. The process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Goodwin Procter LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Goodwin Procter uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine base salary levels, which start at $160,000, while including flexibility for merit-based assessments. Bonuses met the Cravath level, though individual associates complained about a lack of transparency in the assessment process. Spring bonuses did match the Cravath level in 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Greenberg Traurig, LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Greenberg Traurig has a lockstep and merit-based system to determine salaries. Both salaries and bonuses are discretionary, leading to a tendency toward the firm playing favorites. Bonuses fall behind market levels and many associates don&#8217;t receive a bonus at all.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hogan Lovells LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary is determined by billable hours. Those that bill 1,800 hours receive a below-market salary and those that bill above 1,950 receive a market-level salary. Bonuses match the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Those that bill 2,000 hours receive a Cravath-level bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Holland &amp; Knight LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Holland &amp; Knight has a hybrid lockstep system, with salaries starting at $145,000. After that, salary is determined by seniority, billable hours, profitability, and quality of work. Bonuses were awarded in 2011 for performance at a rate of $2,500 for first through fourth year associates and $5,000 for fifth year and up associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hughes Hubbard &amp; Reed LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Hughes, Hubbard &amp; Reed has a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 and is based on subjective variables after that including billable hours, pro bono work, contribution to the firm, and quality, though the reviews are not very detailed and only sub-par reviews cause an associate to miss out on a salary raise. Bonuses were at above-market levels in 2009 but dropped to market level in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses. At least 1,950 hours are required to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hunton &amp; Williams LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Hunton &amp; Williams have a lockstep system and base salaries that start at $145,000 or $160,000 depending on the size of the market. Salary after that is determined by seniority and merit-based factors. Bonuses fall behind the market levels and are not distributed until May or June.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. It is thought that 2,100 to 2,200 hours are required to qualify for bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Irell &amp; Manella LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Irell &amp; Manella has starting salaries that start at $160,000. Bonuses fell between $15,000 and $70,000 in 2009 and doubled Cravath-level bonuses in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and class year determine bonuses, with a minimum of 2,000 hours required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jackson Lewis LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jackson Lewis has different base salaries depending on the market, the lowest of which is $125,000. This is way below market levels. Bonuses are also below market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k,</p>
<p>$130k,</p>
<p>$135k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jenner &amp; Block LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jenner &amp; Block has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000 that switches to merit-based after the first year. Salary determinations are highly subjective as are bonuses. Bonuses ranged from $2,000 to $38,000 in 2009 and has fallen behind market levels in subsequent years.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jones Day</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jones Day has a merit-based salary system that includes factors like billable hours, pro bono, contribution, quality of work, and business development. Starting salaries range from $145,000 to $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses are incorporated into salaries depending on each associate&#8217;s contribution. Typically, bonuses fall above market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">K&amp;L Gates</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">K&amp;L Gates has starting salaries that fall between $115,000 and $160,000, depending on market size, then slip into a merit-based system that takes into account billable hours, quality of work, contribution, performance, and other factors. Bonuses are discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. 1,950 hours are required to qualify for a bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kasowitz, Benson, Torres &amp; Friedman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kasowitz, Benson, Torres &amp; Friedman has lockstep starting salaries of $160,000. It keeps with market levels for bonus amounts, though does not exceed it.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Factors determining bonus amounts are not clear.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Katten Muchin Rosenman has a lockstep salary system that starts at $130,000 and $160,000 depending on the market. After that, salaries are based on class year, billable hours, and performance. Bonus amounts fall behind market levels, however.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kaye Scholer LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kaye Scholer has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000. Bonus amounts follow market trends. Qualifying associates in 2009 received between $20,000 and $40,000. Cravath-level bonuses were awarded in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses. 1,950 hours (1,800 billable) is the minimum requirement.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kilpatrick Townsend &amp; Stockton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kilpatrick Townsend &amp; Stockton has a merit-based system to determine salary. Starting salary is $135,000 to $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses follow market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">King &amp; Spalding LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">King &amp; Spalding has a lockstep system for determining salaries, which start at $135,000 and $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses lag behind market standards but a lack of billable hours minimum compensates for this fact. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k,</p>
<p>$140k,</p>
<p>$145k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>165k,</p>
<p>$175k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$190k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$22k,</p>
<p>$22k,</p>
<p>$27k,</p>
<p>$30k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses, though discretionary factors can come into play. A minimum of 2,050 hours is required</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kirkland &amp; Ellis LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kirkland &amp; Ellis has a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Double the market value bonuses are available to those that bill high hours.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Above 2,200 garners increased bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Knobbe Martens Olson &amp; Bear LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Knobbe Martens Olson &amp; Bear has a lockstep system to determine starting salaries. Base salaries begin at $140,000. Bonuses lag behind market levels because they&#8217;re based on the number of hours billed that fall above the quota.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$140k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are based on billable hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kramer Levin Naftalis &amp; Frankel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Karmer Levin Naftalis &amp; Frankel has a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels, though they are usually not paid out until February.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonus amounts. 2,150 hours are needed for a full bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Latham &amp; Watkins LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Latham &amp; Watkins have a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Bonuses are typically above market levels, sometimes so much as double. Spring bonuses were also awarded in 2011 that met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required to earn the base bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Linklaters</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Linklaters has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses are lockstep as well, and fall in line with market levels. 2011 spring bonuses fell below Cravath scale level, however.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Manatt Phelps &amp; Phillips</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Manatt Phelps &amp; Phillips uses a hybrid lockstep system with salaries starting at $125,000 and bonuses that fall below market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mayer Brown LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Mayer Brown has a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 for the first class year and has a range of salaries for every class year after that depending on billable hours, quality, pro bono, and other factors. Bonuses match market levels. End of year 2010 and spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonus eligibility with a minimum of 2,000.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">McDermott, Will &amp; Emery</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting pay at McDermott, Will &amp; Emery is $145,000 though a merit-based system was implemented in 2011 that made it so associates only received their full pay if they worked 2,000 billable hours. Bonus amounts meet market levels and they aren&#8217;t awarded until March.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">McGuireWoods LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">McGuireWoods uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine salary amounts. Starting salary is $130,000 with assessments each year after resulting in pay raises based on billable hours, pro bono, quality, performance, and other factors. Bonuses tend to be below market levels though working more hours will garner a higher payout.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &amp; McCloy LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Milbank,Tweed, Hadley &amp; McCloy uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Year-end and spring bonuses for 2010 and 2011 met the Cravath level.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Morgan, Lewis &amp; Bockius LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Morgan Lewis uses a hybrid lockstep system with starting salaries at $145,000 in most markets. Bonuses keep up with market levels but increases are implementing very slowly. End of year bonuses for 2010 were paid in January 2011 for double the Cravath level.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Morrison &amp; Foerster has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. The firm follows market levels for bonuses, with more being awarded to those who bill a high number of hours and perform well. Bonuses ranged from $7,500 to $65,000 in 2010. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,950 hours warrants a standard bonus; 1,500 hours, a special bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson uses a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. First year associates received a flat $5,000 bonus in 2009 with rates matching market levels for following class years.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including billable hours, quality of work, and other factors.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Nixon Peabody LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Nixon Peabody uses a hybrid lockstep system that starts at $145,000. Raises are dependent on performance. Bonus worth 30% of salary is possible.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">O&#8217;Melveny &amp; Myers LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">O&#8217;Melveny has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels and not every associate receives a bonus. Spring 2011 bonuses were on the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. 1,950 hours is the minimum to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe uses a talent model to determine compensation, with different amounts for associates, managing associates, and senior associates. Advancement is dependent on merit only. 2009 bonuses ranged from $5,000 to $75,000. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. There is no minimum billable hours requirement, though pro bono work factors in.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Patterson Belknap Webb &amp; Tyler LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Patterson Belknap Webb &amp; Tyler has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and class year determine bonuses. Special bonuses given to those that log more than 2,100 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Patton Boggs LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Patton Boggs uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine salaries with three tiers separated by billable hours: 1,650, 1,800 and 1,950. Bonuses are paid in March and fall behind or meet market levels depending on several factors.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Two options are available: 1. Based on billable hours above minimum 2. Based on hours, pro bono, work quality, etc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &amp; Walker LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &amp; Walker use a lockstep system to determine salaries. Bonuses match market levels and are paid out in March. 2010 bonuses matched Cravath scale for top-tier associates. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath level for all associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. Minimum 1,950 hours to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison uses a lockstep system to determine starting salaries. Bonuses are paid in December and match market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$37k,</p>
<p>$42k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Perkins Coie LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Perkins Cole uses a lockstep system to determine starting salaries ranging from $120,000 to $160,000 depending on the office&#8217;s location. After that, merit plays a role in class year salary. Bonuses include equity in an investment plan.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$120k,</p>
<p>$120k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including productivity.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw &amp; Pittman has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $155,000 with raises made each year depending on if associates met a minimum number of billable hours. 2010 bonuses matched the market level at $15,000 for qualifying associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$155k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including productivity. Minimum billable hours required is 1,950.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Proskauer Rose LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Proskauer Rose has a lockstep system that start at $110,000 to $160,000 depending on the location of the office. Bonuses follow the market scale, with 2010 bonuses falling in line with the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonus amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan falls behind the market scale for salaries. Bonuses were awarded in 2010 at 150% of the Cravath scale plus $5,000 per additional 200 hours past the base level. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the Cravath scale for those billing 2,000 hours and beat it for those billing above 2,100.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$11k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$22k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$37k,</p>
<p>$45k,</p>
<p>$52k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and billable hours determines bonus amount with a 2,100 hour minimum.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Ropes &amp; Gray LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Ropes &amp; Gray has a lockstep system for determining base salaries. Bonuses match market levels at were at the Cravath level in 2009 and 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Schulte Roth &amp; Zabel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Schulte, Roth &amp; Zabel has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses match the market levels. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> $160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class and billable hours year determines bonus amount with a 2,000-hour minimum.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Shearman &amp; Sterling LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Shearman &amp; Sterling have a lockstep salary system. Bonuses match the market level, though deviated slightly in 2010 when merit-based determinations were put in place. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the top of the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year, billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sidley Austin LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Sidley Austin has a lockstep system to determine salaries and advancement. 2010 and 2011 bonuses met or exceeded the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process isn&#8217;t transparent. Minimum 2,000 hours are needed for full market-rate bonus</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett has a lockstep system to determine salaries, which are at the top of the market. Bonuses met the Cravath scale in 2009 and 2010. Spring 2011 bonuses also matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, &amp; Flom have a lockstep system for determining salaries. Bonuses meet market level in 2010 and were paid in December. Spring 2011 bonuses also met the market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and billable hours determine bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SNR Denton</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">SNR Denton uses a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 with 12-15% of that paid out as a base bonus in the next year. After the first year, a three-tier system allows for raises based on merit.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$150k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>$157k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$165k,</p>
<p>$179k,</p>
<p>$205k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey uses a merit-based system to determine salaries, which start at $117,000 and vary depending on class and performance.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$117k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Steptoe &amp; Johnson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Steptoe &amp; Johnson use a lockstep system with some variable aspects, which start at $165,000. Bonuses falls below the market, though a supplemental bonus system does award additional money to those who bring new business to the firm.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan uses a lockstep scale and pays at market rates. 2009 bonuses met the Cravath scale for those who met the billable hour minimum.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year, billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 hours is the minimum requirement.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell uses a lockstep system to determine salaries. Compensation is typically ahead of the market, though it has matched it in 2009 and 2010. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale in December for years 1-6 and gave even more than that to years 7-8. Special bonuses are also occasionally awarded in the spring. In 2009 they ranged from $500 to $8,500.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$37k,</p>
<p>$42k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Venable LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salaries at Venable vary depending on class and merit, but they start at $145,000. Bonuses fall below the market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vinson &amp; Elkins L.L.P.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Vinson &amp; Elkins uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 for first years. A lockstep bonus is also given to first years, but all years after that provide higher bonus amounts depending on billable hours. 2010 bonuses were above the Cravath scale, though spring 2011 bonuses fell below it.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. For senior associates, bonus levels are higher at 1,950, 2,150, and 2,300 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $165,000. Bonuses are a percentage of an associate&#8217;s base salary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are determined by salary percentage.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses meet the Cravath scale. As of 2011, the firm no longer pays a special bonus to particularly high performing members.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">White &amp; Case LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">White &amp; Case uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, though payment varies from office to office. Bonuses meet market levels and are paid out in January. Spring 2011 bonuses were paid out in April and were highly variable.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including pro bono, contribution, and quality of work. The process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Williams &amp; Connolly LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Williams &amp; Connolly uses at lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $180,00 for first year associates. Bonuses are not awarded and are built into the base salary, instead.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$230k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">No bonuses are awarded.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher uses a lockstep system to determine salaries in its U.S.-based offices. Bonuses are paid out in December each year to all associates at market levels. 2009, 2010, and spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">WilmerHale</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries at WilmerHale are $165,000 though the firm is moving to a merit-based structure in 2012, at which time a higher percentage of salary will be paid out in bonuses determined by performance, quality of work, pro bono work, and other factors. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati use a hybrid lockstep and merit-based system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses are at the market level, with a few associates getting higher than that. Bonuses ranged from a max of $9,000 for first years to $49,000 for senior associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. Bonuses levels cap at 1,900, 2,100, and 2,400 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Winston &amp; Strawn LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Winston &amp; Strawn uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which meet the market levels. 2009 and 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale. 2011 spring bonuses were not awarded.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including pro bono, quality of work, contribution and other factors. The process is not transparent. Over 2,200 hours nets an additional bonus.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This <a title="LawCrossing Survey" href="http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/7349/LawCrossing-Survey-of-Lawyer-Salaries-in-Best-Law-Firms/" target="_blank">LawCrossing attorney salary survey</a> was first published on <a title="LawCrossing" href="http://www.lawcrossing.com/" target="_blank">LawCrossing.com</a>. If you would like to provide updates to this information, feel free to provide them anonymously by commenting below.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/30/law-firm-of-akin-gump-has-second-defamation-lawsuit-filed-against-it/" title="Law Firm of Akin Gump Has Second Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against It">Law Firm of Akin Gump Has Second Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against It</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/05/allen-overy-announces-launch-of-office-in-istanbul/" title="Allen &amp; Overy Announces Launch of Office In Istanbul">Allen &amp; Overy Announces Launch of Office In Istanbul</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/02/baker-mckenzie-announces-appointment-of-new-chief-operating-officer-to-australia-offices/" title="Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices">Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/02/allen-overy-expands-australian-practice/" title="Allen &amp; Overy Expands Australian Practice">Allen &amp; Overy Expands Australian Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jenner &amp; Block Rated Nation&#8217;s Top Pro Bono Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/jenner-block-rated-nations-top-pro-bono-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/jenner-block-rated-nations-top-pro-bono-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[am law rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenner & Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro bono hours per attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro bono matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan c. levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=24729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenner &#38; Block was named the top law firm in the country for pro bono service for the third year in a row by The American Lawyer magazine. Jenner &#38; Block offered more than 69,000 hours of pro bono service in 2009 to top the AM Law rankings. Services offered included helping fledgling non-profits and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/jennerblock_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-5894" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/jennerblock_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a><a href="http://www.jenner.com">Jenner &amp; Block </a>was named the top law firm in the country for pro bono service for the third year in a row by <em>The American Lawyer</em> magazine.</p>
<p>Jenner &amp; Block offered more than 69,000 hours of pro bono service in 2009 to top the AM Law rankings. Services offered included helping fledgling non-profits and representing the needy in courts across the country, Jenner &amp; Block said in a press release.</p>
<p>The firm obtained the number one rank through a combination of having 161.1 average pro bono hours per attorney, and having 83.5% of its attorneys, representing 100% of associates and nearly two-thirds of partners, contribute more than 20 hours to pro bono matters.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a significant honor for our Firm,&#8221; said Susan C. Levy, Jenner &amp; Block&#8217;s Managing Partner.  &#8221;It confirms the substantial commitment and effort our attorneys made in 2009 to helping the neediest in our communities, and reflects our unwavering dedication to the Firm&#8217;s core values.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to the past three years, Jenner &amp; Block was also rates as the nation’s top pro bono law firm in 1998. Jenner &amp; Block has around 450 attorneys with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington D.C.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/12/morning-roundup-178/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/18/jenner-block-adds-former-counsel-for-general-dynamics/" title="Jenner &amp; Block Adds Former Counsel for General Dynamics">Jenner &amp; Block Adds Former Counsel for General Dynamics</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/29/jenner-block-earns-major-pro-bono-victory-12000-hours-spent-on-latest-trial/" title="Jenner Block Earns Major Pro Bono Victory; 12,000 Hours Spent on Latest Trial">Jenner Block Earns Major Pro Bono Victory; 12,000 Hours Spent on Latest Trial</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/27/jenner-block-partner-andrew-weismann-joins-fbi-as-general-counsel/" title="Jenner &amp; Block Partner Andrew Weismann Joins FBI as General Counsel">Jenner &amp; Block Partner Andrew Weismann Joins FBI as General Counsel</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/14/morning-roundup-204/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/jenner-block-rated-nations-top-pro-bono-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Munger, Tolles Tops AmLaw A-List</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/01/munger-tolles-tops-amlaw-a-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/01/munger-tolles-tops-amlaw-a-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-List Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal systems of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munger Tolles & Olson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter munger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top a-list firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=24565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos!  The Los Angeles based firm Munger Tolles &#38; Olson has been placed for the third year running at the top of the American Lawyer A-List.  Rankings are based, according to AmLaw, on four factors, revenue per lawyer, pro bono commitment, diversity among lawyers and associate satisfaction.  More weight is given to the first two categories, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/mto_box_large.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-24566" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/mto_box_large.jpg" alt="" width="102" height="104" /></a>Kudos!  The Los Angeles based firm <a href="http://www.mto.com">Munger Tolles &amp; Olson</a> has been placed for the third year running at the top of the <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202462828813&amp;The_AList_br__Turning_Pro">American Lawyer A-List</a>.  Rankings are based, according to AmLaw, on four factors, revenue per lawyer, pro bono commitment, diversity among lawyers and associate satisfaction.  More weight is given to the first two categories, pro bono hours being the biggest deciding factor this year for many of the firms on the list.</p>
<p>Munger Tolles, according to the report published by AmLaw, scored a near perfect score on diversity.  “The Los Angeles–based firm, which counts 25 percent of its lawyers and 15 percent of its partners as minorities, increased its diversity score by 2 percent, to 199 … [The firm’s managing partner, Sandra Seville-Jones,] takes particular pride in the firm&#8217;s pipeline initiatives, such as the MTO Fellows Program, which targets minority college grads.”  In addition diversity initiative, Munger showed significant improvement in associate satisfaction, which will undoubtedly make the firm an attractive prospective employer for future law school grads.</p>
<p>Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson has offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco.  Its principal areas of practice include bankruptcy, corporate, environmental, labor and employment, litigation, real estate and tax.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/05/chief-of-criminal-division-for-u-s-attorneys-office-set-to-join-munger-tolles-olson/" title="Chief of Criminal Division for U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office Set to Join Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson">Chief of Criminal Division for U.S. Attorney&#8217;s Office Set to Join Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/01/doj-confirms-appointment-of-munger-tolles-olson-partner-pomerantz-to-trial-team-in-antitrust-case-against-att/" title="DOJ Confirms Appointment of Munger Tolles &amp; Olson Partner Pomerantz to Trial Team in Antitrust Case Against AT&amp;T">DOJ Confirms Appointment of Munger Tolles &amp; Olson Partner Pomerantz to Trial Team in Antitrust Case Against AT&amp;T</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/29/morning-roundup-218/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/12/morning-roundup-140/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/jenner-block-rated-nations-top-pro-bono-firm/" title="Jenner &amp; Block Rated Nation&#8217;s Top Pro Bono Firm">Jenner &amp; Block Rated Nation&#8217;s Top Pro Bono Firm</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/01/munger-tolles-tops-amlaw-a-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Alaskan Enviromental Law Firms Announced by bestattorneysonline.com</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/31/21981/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/31/21981/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atkinson Conway & Gagnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atkinson conway & gagnon inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bestattorneysonline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feldman Orlansky & Sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guess & Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hertig Rhodes Hoge & Lekisch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hertig rhodes hoge & lekisch pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holmes Weddles & Barcott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes Gorski Seedorf Odesn & Tervooren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landye Bennett Blumstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landye bennett blumstein llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Office of Bruce B. Weyhrauch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond & Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winner & Associates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=21981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bestattorneysonline.com has announced the top 10 Alaskan environmental law firms for March. Thousands of firms applied. Firms are evaluated by a research team, who assess their past work and knowledge of Alaska’s environmental laws. A variety of questions are asked, such as, “Does the firm have a good understanding of pollution emission laws for corporations?” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/banner_supersizeit1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-21984" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/banner_supersizeit1.jpg" alt="" width="387" height="48" /></a><a href="http://www.bestattorneysonline.com/">Bestattorneysonline.com </a><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/banner_supersizeit.jpg"></a>has announced the top 10 Alaskan environmental law firms for March. <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/seo-first-award.png"></a></p>
<p>Thousands of firms applied. Firms are evaluated by a research team, who assess their past work and knowledge of Alaska’s environmental laws. A variety of questions are asked, such as, “Does the firm have a good understanding of pollution emission laws for corporations?” or “Do the attorneys work hard to make sure that their client is aware of the various poaching laws?”</p>
<p>The top ten environmental law firms in Alaska for March 2010 are:</p>
<p>1. Hertig Rhodes Hoge &amp; Lekisch, P.C. A Professional Corporation<br />
2. Atkinson, Conway &amp; Gagnon, Inc.<br />
3. Law Office of Bruce B. Weyhrauch, LLC<br />
4. Landye Bennett Blumstein, LLP<br />
5. Holmes Weddle &amp; Barcott, A Professional Corporation<br />
6. Hughes Gorski Seedorf Odsen &amp; Tervooren, LLC<br />
7. Guess &amp; Rudd P.C.<br />
8. Feldman Orlansky &amp; Sanders<br />
9. Winner &amp; Associates, A Professional Corporation<br />
10. Richmond &amp; Quinn, A Professional Corporation</p>
<p>Bestattorneysonline.com evaluates and ranks the best attorneys throughout the United states in sixteen various practice fields. The company’s goal is to provide users with a new way to locate and contact an attorney or a law firm while providing firms a way to get their image out and into the open.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/" title="LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms">LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/jenner-block-rated-nations-top-pro-bono-firm/" title="Jenner &amp; Block Rated Nation&#8217;s Top Pro Bono Firm">Jenner &amp; Block Rated Nation&#8217;s Top Pro Bono Firm</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/01/munger-tolles-tops-amlaw-a-list/" title="Munger, Tolles Tops AmLaw A-List">Munger, Tolles Tops AmLaw A-List</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/09/5259-fewer-jobs-at-top-250-law-firms/" title="5259 Fewer Jobs at Top 250 Law Firms">5259 Fewer Jobs at Top 250 Law Firms</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/31/21981/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5259 Fewer Jobs at Top 250 Law Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/09/5259-fewer-jobs-at-top-250-law-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/09/5259-fewer-jobs-at-top-250-law-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cut attorney positions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latham & Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[struggling legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=17790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report issued by the National Law Journal, the top 250 law firms cut 5,259 attorney positions this year in the worst year since the NLJ began compiling the statistics. The firm shedding the most jobs was Latham &#38; Watkins which has 444 fewer lawyers than last year. The number of partners grew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nationallawjournal_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9067" title="nationallawjournal_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nationallawjournal_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>According to a report issued by the <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/index.jsp">National Law Journal</a>, the top 250 law firms cut 5,259 attorney positions this year in the worst year since the NLJ began compiling the statistics.  The firm shedding the most jobs was <a href="http://www.lw.com/">Latham &amp; Watkins</a> which has 444 fewer lawyers than last year.  The number of partners grew by one percent over all, while associates were cut at the rate of 8.7% and of counsel and staff lawyer positions shrunk by 8.9%.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/08/morning-roundup-63/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/12/morning-roundup-44/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/08/morning-roundup-225/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/08/survey-nlj-250-firms-continue-to-shed-lawyer-jobs/" title="Survey: NLJ 250 Firms Continue to Shed Lawyer Jobs">Survey: NLJ 250 Firms Continue to Shed Lawyer Jobs</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/07/morning-roundup-101/" title="Morning Roundup ">Morning Roundup </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/09/5259-fewer-jobs-at-top-250-law-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

