Last week, Maryland Public Defender Nancy Forster, the state’s chief Public Defender since 2001, was suddenly terminated, with a reason given publicly, by a 2-1 vote of the Board of Trustees.

Hours before the termination was made public, Forster fired two public defender lawyers.

This week, acting Maryland Public Defender Elizabeth Julian restored the positions of the lawyers terminated by Forster.

Forster was a public defender for 25 years, and has accused the Board of requiring her to perform unlawful acts.

• Former Appellate Judge Joins Maryland Law Firm
• Former Chief Counsel of FDA Joins Venable
• Morning Roundup
• No More Cell phones, Computers or Tweeting in Maryland Courtrooms
• Alameda CA Public Defender Job Cuts Mean Cases Refused

“This letter shall serve as formal notification to you that upon my taking office as District Attorney for Polk County, your current appointment as deputy district attorney will expire. If you wish to be considered for subsequent appointment by me, please contact my secretary…

The AFSCME insists that Butterfield is overstepping his authority. AFSCME Local 173′s Don Loving:

“The union that represents Polk County employees … will vigorously oppose any effort by Polk County District Attorney-elect Stan Butterfield to replace any of the current five deputy district attorneys.”

Butterfield insists that the deputy DAs are “at will” employees; the union replies that’s a misunderstanding of Oregon labor law.

“These are employees represented by a legal and binding collective bargaining agreement. Mr. Butterfield’s election comes with no magic wand that eliminates that agreement. Moreover, this exact same type of case has been litigated several times all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court, and the courts have been clear in siding with the represented employees.”

Loving said a union attorney has sent Butterfield a letter outlining the legal history of similar cases.

In Oregon, elected district attorneys have the leeway to appoint replacement deputies in the event of a resignation or to terminate with reasonable cause. But the district attorney is not authorized to make a carte blanche change.

Via The Statesman-Journal.

• Layoffs for Sacramento DA Office
• Boulder County DA Fires 6 Prosecutors
• LA County DA Not Immune to Retaliation Claim
• Myrl Serra Disbarred For A Felony And Misdemenor Harassment Charges
• Ex-employee Files Suit Against Former Law Firm

Kaleidescape, which designs home entertainment systems that allow users to copy and store DVDs, won at trial against the DVD Copy Control Association in California Superior Court in 2007. The Hollywood-backed DVD-CCA claimed that its licensing agreement was violated by the copying. The win was heralded as a victory for Internet companies and tech companies at war with copyright owners in Hollywood.

Palo Alto-based IP lawyer Thomas Moore, who tried the case along with San Francisco attorney Richard Wiebe, said that getting fired and not paid isn’t fair because he helped the company win at trial.

“Among all the losses, Pyrrhic victories and mostly settlements, a clear company-saving victory like this is such a rare thing,” Moore said. “I really thought I was going to get paid.”

But the company’s CEO, Michael Malcolm, said that Moore was terminated because of his performance as a lawyer. ”We were not comfortable having him represent the company anymore,” Malcolm said. “It was over the performance, not the fee dispute.”

Opposing counsel William Coats, the White & Case lawyer representing DVD-CCA, said he didn’t know the details of the dispute, but was “surprised” to hear about the problems. “I thought [Moore] did a very good and professional job,” he said.

Moore’s lawsuit claims that Kaleidescape hasn’t paid his two-person Palo Alto law firm, The Moore Law Group, since before the trial in March 2007. Kaleidescape owes $400,000 for the work at trial and on the appeal briefing.

Exactly why Moore was terminated isn’t clear. One factor may be that [Kaleidescape's] Denise Malcolm insisted on putting opposing counsel Coats on the stand during trial, which Moore thought was ill-advised and refused to do.

“It is part of the lore of trying cases that you don’t do that,” Moore said. “So why would you want to? If you learned your trial practice from watching ‘Law and Order,’ you get odd ideas.”

Moore said the Malcolms were hard to represent because they liked to “micromanage” him, but he credited their performance on the witness stand as helping Kaleidescape to victory.

Via Law.com.

• Morning Roundup
• DLA Piper Sued in Alleged Discovery Matter
• Morning Roundup
• Kaye Scholer Opens in Silicon Valley
• Morning Roundup