<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; same-sex couples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/same-sex-couples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Foley &amp; Lardner LLP sees LGBT Index Rating Drop</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/12/foley-lardner-llp-sees-lgbt-index-rating-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/12/foley-lardner-llp-sees-lgbt-index-rating-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foley & Lardner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex couples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=32140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law firm of Foley &#38; Lardner LLP saw its points on the 2012 Corporate Equality Index docked by the Human Rights Campaign on Thursday of last week.  The index rates companies based on the policies they have regarding gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees. The law firm group’s rating on the index was reduced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/foleylardner_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-12388" title="foleylardner_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/foleylardner_160x120-150x120.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="120" /></a></p>
<p>The law firm of Foley &amp; Lardner LLP saw its points on the 2012 Corporate Equality Index docked by the Human Rights Campaign on Thursday of last week.  The index rates companies based on the policies they have regarding gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees. The law firm group’s rating on the index was reduced because it supports groups that oppose same-sex marriage, according to <a href="http://www.law360.com/legalindustry/articles/292331/anti-gay-marriage-clients-spur-foley-s-drop-in-lgbt-index">Law360</a>.</p>
<p>There are 139 law firms rated by the index, with the score of 60 for the Foley firm coming in as one of the lowest of all the law firms. The scoring is done on a 100-point scale. The majority of the law firms rated on the index are members of the Am Law 200. Fifty-five of the law firms rated on the index achieved perfect scores, while 44 law firms received scores of 90 on the index. There were only 13 law firms that scored at or below the rating of 60 that Foley received.</p>
<p>Back in 2009 and 2010, Foley earned perfect scores on the index, but its rating on the index dropped to 85 in 2011. The lower score for Foley was reported to the firm by the president of the HRC, Joe Solmonese, who sent a letter to the firm on November 8. The letter to the firm expressed the dissatisfaction of the firm for its representation of the National Organization for Marriage. The letter called the representation “a notable step backwards.”</p>
<p>Also according to the letter, Foley partner Cleta Mitchell has registered as NOM’s Minnesota lobbyist. The reason for this could be the fact that Mitchell will advocate for legislation on its behalf. The letter from Solmonese states that even though the firm has to represent some very unpopular clients, lawyers do have a duty to take on controversial cases. Solmonese also said that the registration as a lobbyist by Mitchell &#8220;goes well beyond any professional or ethical obligations of legal representation.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Moreover, the firm has established a clear pattern of knowingly taking on anti-LGBT organizations as clients, even after we and others in the community expressed concerns,&#8221; Solmonese said in the letter.</p>
<p>In 2010, the HRC had already dropped the firm as a national corporate partner. This occurred after the firm decided to represent the Stand for Marriage D.C., which is an organization based in Washington that openly opposes gay marriage. The letter also stated that Foley has not responded to the previous two surveys released by the HRC.</p>
<p>There were 636 companies rated by the 2012 survey on criteria that includes workplace protections, domestic partner health care, and adoption assistance. The legal world was the largest of the industries surveyed that came away with perfect scores, which was 55. The industry of banking and financial services came in second with 22 perfect scores.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/05/three-firms-take-the-lead-on-the-proposed-sale-of-nfls-jacksonville-jaguars/" title="Three Firms Take the Lead on the Proposed Sale of NFL&#8217;s Jacksonville Jaguars">Three Firms Take the Lead on the Proposed Sale of NFL&#8217;s Jacksonville Jaguars</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/09/16/foley-lardner-continues-expansion-of-bankruptcy-practice/" title="Foley &amp; Lardner Continues Expansion of Bankruptcy Practice ">Foley &amp; Lardner Continues Expansion of Bankruptcy Practice </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/morning-roundup-209/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/18/prominent-life-sciences-patent-attorney-joins-foley-lardner/" title="Prominent Life Sciences Patent Attorney Joins Foley &amp; Lardner">Prominent Life Sciences Patent Attorney Joins Foley &amp; Lardner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/25/schiff-hardin-adds-three-laterals-from-foley-lardner/" title="Schiff Hardin Adds Three Laterals from Foley &amp; Lardner">Schiff Hardin Adds Three Laterals from Foley &amp; Lardner</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/12/foley-lardner-llp-sees-lgbt-index-rating-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Supreme Court To Hear Arguments Regarding Gay Marriage Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/california-supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-regarding-gay-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/california-supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-regarding-gay-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Allred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Maroko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepperdine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Minter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therese Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=7987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost exactly one year after the California Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the right for gay couples to marry, many of the same lawyers will be back on Thursday to argue if the state’s recent same-sex marriage ban should stand or be revoked. This Thursday, the Supreme Court will hold three hours of oral arguments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/casupremecourt_300x225.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4860" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/casupremecourt_300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>Almost exactly one year after the California Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the right for gay couples to marry, many of the same lawyers will be back on Thursday to argue if the state’s recent same-sex marriage ban should stand or be revoked.</p>
<p>This Thursday, the Supreme Court will hold three hours of oral arguments from 9:00 AM to noon on three lawsuits aimed at overturning Proposition 8, the voter approved ban on gay marriage approved in November of 2008.</p>
<p>Lawyers representing-same sex couples – 18,000 have been married since last year – and a group of local governments will get 90 minutes to present their arguments.  Those lawyers include Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart and Michael Maroko, a partner of Los Angeles lawyer Gloria Allred.</p>
<p>Sponsors of Proposition 8 have an hour. They are being represented by Pepperdine law school dean Kenneth Starr.  California Attorney General Jerry Brown has declined to argue the state’s position.  Deputy Attorney General Christopher Krueger will be arguing for the state.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/12/stay-lifted-in-california-same-sex-marriage-ban/" title="Stay Lifted in California Same-Sex Marriage Ban">Stay Lifted in California Same-Sex Marriage Ban</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/13/morning-roundup-148/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/15/supporters-of-proposition-8-argue-for-right-to-appeal/" title="Supporters of Proposition 8 Argue for Right to Appeal">Supporters of Proposition 8 Argue for Right to Appeal</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/04/judge-rules-against-californias-same-sex-marriage-ban/" title="Judge Rules Against California&#8217;s Same-Sex Marriage Ban">Judge Rules Against California&#8217;s Same-Sex Marriage Ban</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/11/supreme-court-blocks-broadcast-of-prop-8-trial/" title="Supreme Court Blocks Broadcast of Prop 8 Trial">Supreme Court Blocks Broadcast of Prop 8 Trial</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/california-supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-regarding-gay-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

