<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; revenue down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/revenue-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clifford Chance Leads Rough Year for U.K. Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/08/clifford-chance-leads-rough-year-for-u-k-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/08/clifford-chance-leads-rough-year-for-u-k-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Overy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy of lehman brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clifford Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freshfields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshfields bruckhaus deringer llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linklaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic Circle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.k. firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=24715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revenue at the U.K.’s magic circle firms suffered a decline of 11 percent for the fiscal year ended April 30. Leading the way as the highest-grossing firm for the year was Clifford Chance. Clifford Chance returned to the top spot despite suffering a 5 percent decline in revenue to $1.8 billion, Bloomberg reports. Linklaters, last year’s highest-grossing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ukunitedkingdom_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9637" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ukunitedkingdom_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Revenue at the U.K.’s magic circle firms suffered a decline of 11 percent for the fiscal year ended April 30. Leading the way as the highest-grossing firm for the year was<a href="http://www.cliffordchance.com"> Clifford Chance</a>.</p>
<p>Clifford Chance returned to the top spot despite suffering a 5 percent decline in revenue to $1.8 billion, Bloomberg reports.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linklaters.com">Linklaters</a>, last year’s highest-grossing U.K. firm, fell to 2<sup>nd</sup> on revenue of $1.78 billion, which was an 8.8 percent decline from the prior year. Rounding out the magic circle firms were <a href="http://www.freshfields.com">Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP </a>with $1.73 billion, a drop of 11 percent; and <a href="http://www.allenovery.com">Allen &amp; Overy</a> LLP, which reported revenue of $1.59 billion, a four percent drop.</p>
<p>Revenue is down a bit, but you always expect it to come down as the recession unwinds,” Tony Williams, founder of Jomati Consultants in London and a former managing partner at Clifford Chance, told Bloomberg. “The initial panic from the financial crisis and the Lehman collapse caused a lot of work, and there’s been a period where everyone sort of licks their wounds.”</p>
<p>Bloomberg cited a major decrease in mergers &amp; acquisitions work as the reason for the declines.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/morning-roundup-177/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/04/08/london-firms-delay-partner-promotions/" title="London Firms Delay Partner Promotions">London Firms Delay Partner Promotions</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/20/denton-wilde-sapte-to-cut-up-to-80-jobs/" title="UK&#8217;s Dentons to Cut Up to 80 Jobs">UK&#8217;s Dentons to Cut Up to 80 Jobs</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/19/allen-overy-to-fire-10-hong-kong-lawyers/" title="Allen &#038; Overy to Fire 10 Hong Kong Lawyers">Allen &#038; Overy to Fire 10 Hong Kong Lawyers</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2008/12/12/linklaters-top-paid-lawyer-earned-satisfactory-34-million-in-2008/" title="Linklaters&#8217; Top-Paid Lawyer Earned &#8220;Satisfactory&#8221; £3.4 Million in 2008">Linklaters&#8217; Top-Paid Lawyer Earned &#8220;Satisfactory&#8221; £3.4 Million in 2008</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/08/clifford-chance-leads-rough-year-for-u-k-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Revenue Plummets For U.S.-Based Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/13/london-revenue-plummets-for-u-s-based-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/13/london-revenue-plummets-for-u-s-based-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker & McKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K&L Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latham & Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayer Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue decreases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White & Case LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WilmerHale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=22609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nine of the 10 biggest U.S. firms with operations in London saw revenue decreases in 2009 with the lone holdout being Latham &#38; Watkins. According to TheLawyer.com,  revenue for the top 10 U.S. firms in London fell by an average of 12 percent and among the top 30 firms revenue was down by 5 percent. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/american-money.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-18973" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/american-money.jpg" alt="" width="116" height="116" /></a>Nine of the 10 biggest U.S. firms with operations in London saw revenue decreases in 2009 with the lone holdout being <a href="http://wwww.lw.com">Latham &amp; Watkins.</a></p>
<p>According to <em>TheLawyer.com</em>,  revenue for the top 10 U.S. firms in London fell by an average of 12 percent and among the top 30 firms revenue was down by 5 percent.  Latham &amp; Watkins, which saw its revenue increase by a mere $1.1 million, was in fact the lone firm out of the top 20 to increase revenue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitecase.com">White &amp; Case</a> again garnered the most revenue among U.S. firms in London, but even it saw its revenue plummet by 20 percent to $197-million.  Runner-up<a href="http://www.bakermckenzie.com"> Baker &amp; McKenzie’s</a> revenue fell by 24 percent to $184.5 million.</p>
<p>The biggest drops in revenue percentage-wise were felt by <a href="http://www.mayerbrown.com">Mayer Brown </a>and <a href="http://www.klgates.com">K&amp;L Gates</a>. Both firms dropped 28 percent, with Mayer Brown down to $146.3 million and K&amp;L Gates to $43.3 million.</p>
<p>The biggest increase last year came from <a href="http://www.wilmerhale.com">WilmerHale</a>, which moved from 23<sup>rd</sup> in 2008 to 17<sup>th</sup> in 2009 through an $8.2 million increase in revenue.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/08/morning-roundup-225/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/08/survey-nlj-250-firms-continue-to-shed-lawyer-jobs/" title="Survey: NLJ 250 Firms Continue to Shed Lawyer Jobs">Survey: NLJ 250 Firms Continue to Shed Lawyer Jobs</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/10/white-case-profits-fell-in-2008-despite-layoffs/" title="White &#038; Case Profits Fell in 2008, Despite Layoffs">White &#038; Case Profits Fell in 2008, Despite Layoffs</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/28/31410/" title="Baker &amp; McKenzie Enters Turkey Market Via Exclusive Relationship with Turkish Law Firm">Baker &amp; McKenzie Enters Turkey Market Via Exclusive Relationship with Turkish Law Firm</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/15/morning-roundup-146/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/13/london-revenue-plummets-for-u-s-based-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue Down at Winston &amp; Strawn</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/02/revenue-down-at-winston-strawn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/02/revenue-down-at-winston-strawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue decrease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue per lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston & Strawn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=20779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revenue declined at Winston &#38; Strawn in 2009 while profits remained flat. Gross revenue decreased by 5%, roughly $40 million. Profits per partner remained steady at $1.283 million and the number of equity partners (184) at the firm did not decrease either. Revenue per lawyer decreased 2.6% to $835,824. To absorb decreasing revenues the firm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/winston_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1361" title="winston_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/winston_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Revenue declined at <a href="http://www.winston.com/">Winston &amp; Strawn</a> in 2009 while profits remained flat. Gross revenue decreased by 5%, roughly $40 million. Profits per partner remained steady at $1.283 million and the number of equity partners (184) at the firm did not decrease either. Revenue per lawyer decreased 2.6% to $835,824. To absorb decreasing revenues the firm trimmed its bonus pool and both associates and non-equity partners took <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/12/winston-strawn-keeps-salaries-frozen/">compensation hits</a> in 2009. The average compensation for non-equity partners at Winston &amp; Strawn declined by 14.5%. There was also a drop in non-equity partners from 210 to 197 last year. Overall headcount decreased by 3% to 843 lawyers.</p>
<p>Founded in 1853, Winston &amp; Strawn is a Chicago based firm with offices worldwide including Beijing, Charlotte, Geneva, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Newark, New York, Paris, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/23/revenue-and-profits-decrease-at-munger-tolles/" title="Revenue and Profits Decrease at Munger, Tolles">Revenue and Profits Decrease at Munger, Tolles</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/02/morning-roundup-79/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/23/revenue-down-and-profits-up-at-patton-boggs/" title="Revenue Down and Profits Up at Patton Boggs ">Revenue Down and Profits Up at Patton Boggs </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/12/revenue-down-but-profits-up-at-stevens-lee/" title="Revenue Down But Profits Up at Stevens &amp; Lee">Revenue Down But Profits Up at Stevens &amp; Lee</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/05/morning-roundup-82/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/02/revenue-down-at-winston-strawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue and Profits down, PPP up at Dickstein Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/01/revenue-and-profits-down-ppp-up-at-dickstein-shapiro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/01/revenue-and-profits-down-ppp-up-at-dickstein-shapiro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associate compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickstein Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner per profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per partner profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=20746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a firm, Dickstein Shapiro shared the country&#8217;s economic woes in 2009 with revenues dropping by 4.78% and profits dipping 5.17%, but the partnership still managed to do ok.  Per partner profits were up 6.76% to just over $1 million.  The discrepancy is due to an 11% reduction in the number of equity partners firm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/dicksteinshapiro.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-17728" title="dicksteinshapiro" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/dicksteinshapiro.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="25" /></a>As a firm, Dickstein Shapiro shared the country&#8217;s economic woes in 2009 with revenues dropping by 4.78% and profits dipping 5.17%, but the partnership still managed to do ok.  Per partner profits were up 6.76% to just over $1 million.  The discrepancy is due to an 11% reduction in the number of equity partners firm wide.  The number of non equity partners rose slightly and non equity partner compensation jumped by a little more than 8% to an average of $525,000.</p>
<p>Associates didn&#8217;t fare as well with two rounds of <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/04/more-layoffs-at-dickstein-shapiro/">layoffs</a> and a salary freeze.  This year, associates at the firm are being paid using a <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/14/dickstein-shapiro-abandoning-lockstep/">merit based system</a> rather than lockstep compensation.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/24/profits-revenue-up-at-jenner-block/" title="Profits, Revenue Up at Jenner &amp; Block">Profits, Revenue Up at Jenner &amp; Block</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/04/morning-roundup-81/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/24/revenue-declines-at-arent-fox/" title="Revenue Declines Slightly at Arent Fox">Revenue Declines Slightly at Arent Fox</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/11/morgan-lewis-reports-large-drop-in-proftis/" title="Morgan Lewis Reports Large Drop in Profits">Morgan Lewis Reports Large Drop in Profits</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/01/paul-weiss-profits-up/" title="Paul Weiss Profits Up">Paul Weiss Profits Up</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/01/revenue-and-profits-down-ppp-up-at-dickstein-shapiro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profits and Revenue Down at O&#8217;Melveny for Second Year Running</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/18/20276/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/18/20276/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity partner profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonequity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonequity partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Melveny & Myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue per lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=20276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O&#8217;Melveny &#38; Myers has reported a second year of revenue and profit loss. The Los Angeles-based firms litigation department, composing 55% of the companies lawyers,  has been receiving pressure from clients to lower rates. Coupled with a continuation of the economic downturn, 2009  has seen a gross revenue of $826.6 million, an 8.9% percent drop. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.omm.com/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1497" title="omelveny_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/omelveny_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" />O&#8217;Melveny &amp; Myers</a> has reported a second year of revenue and profit loss. The Los Angeles-based firms litigation department, composing 55% of the companies lawyers,  has been receiving pressure from clients to lower rates. Coupled with a continuation of the economic downturn, 2009  has seen a gross revenue of $826.6 million, an 8.9% percent drop. The firms average equity partner showed a profit of $1.47 million, down by 4.2%. Laying off 90 lawyers last March, O&#8217;Melveny &amp; Myers has seen a 7.9% decrease in total employees, and a 1% decline in per lawyer revenue to $960,000. On a brighter note, the firms expansion in Asia to around 100 lawyers was a factor leading to the growth of its nonequity partners by 33%.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/12/revenue-down-but-profits-up-at-stevens-lee/" title="Revenue Down But Profits Up at Stevens &amp; Lee">Revenue Down But Profits Up at Stevens &amp; Lee</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/25/2009-goes-just-fine-for-duane-morris/" title="2009 Just Fine For Duane Morris">2009 Just Fine For Duane Morris</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/02/revenue-down-at-winston-strawn/" title="Revenue Down at Winston &#038; Strawn ">Revenue Down at Winston &#038; Strawn </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/26/revenue-and-profits-increase-at-cahill/" title="Revenue and Profits Increase at Cahill ">Revenue and Profits Increase at Cahill </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/26/profits-and-revenue-decline-at-debevoise-plimpton/" title="Profits and Revenue Decline at Debevoise &#038; Plimpton ">Profits and Revenue Decline at Debevoise &#038; Plimpton </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/18/20276/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baker &amp; McKenzie Profits Down 17%</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/15/baker-mckenzie-profits-down-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/15/baker-mckenzie-profits-down-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker & McKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laid off attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per equity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue & profits down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=16252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baker &#38; McKenzie reports its average profits per equity partner in fiscal 2008 fell 17%, to $992,000. Revenue was down 3.5% to $2.11 billion. The firm, which in April laid off 38 attorneys and 86 paralegals, has taken a number of other cost cutting measures. Baker &#38; McKenzie was founded in Chicago in 1949 by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/baker-mckenzie/" target="_self"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3353" title="bakermckenzie_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bakermckenzie_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" />Baker &amp; McKenzie</a> reports its average profits per equity partner in fiscal 2008 fell 17%, to $992,000. Revenue was down 3.5% to $2.11 billion.</p>
<p>The firm, which in April laid off <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/04/07/baker-mckenzie-lays-off-124/" target="_self">38 attorneys and 86 paralegals</a>, has taken a number of other cost cutting measures.</p>
<p>Baker &amp; McKenzie was founded in Chicago in 1949 by Russell Baker and John McKenzie. One of the first law firms to be truly global, it employs more than 3,900 lawyers in more than 70 offices in 39 countries.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/12/revenue-flat-but-profits-up-at-baker-mckenzie/" title="Revenue Flat, But Profits Up at Baker &amp; McKenzie">Revenue Flat, But Profits Up at Baker &amp; McKenzie</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/13/london-revenue-plummets-for-u-s-based-firms/" title="London Revenue Plummets For U.S.-Based Firms">London Revenue Plummets For U.S.-Based Firms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/31/sj-berwin-ppp-plummets-50/" title="SJ Berwin PPP Plummets 50%">SJ Berwin PPP Plummets 50%</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/01/profits-plummet-at-clifford-chance/" title="Profits Plummet at Clifford Chance">Profits Plummet at Clifford Chance</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/18/buchanan-ingersolls-revenue-down-for-2008/" title="Buchanan Ingersoll&#8217;s Revenue Down for 2008">Buchanan Ingersoll&#8217;s Revenue Down for 2008</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/15/baker-mckenzie-profits-down-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SJ Berwin PPP Plummets 50%</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/31/sj-berwin-ppp-plummets-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/31/sj-berwin-ppp-plummets-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashurst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berwin Leighton Paisner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clifford Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per equity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SJ Berwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travers Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=15703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law firm SJ Berwin has announced that profits per equity partner, which were £801,000 ($1.33 million) for 2008, fell to £410,000 ($680,000) for 2009. The firm saw revenue fall 14% to £184 million ($305 million). The other British firms that have seen the largest drop in profits are Travers Smith, Clifford Chance, Ashurst and  Berwin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9557" title="sjberwin_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sjberwin_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" />Law firm <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/sj-berwin/" target="_self">SJ Berwin</a> has announced that profits per equity partner, which were £801,000 ($1.33 million) for 2008, fell to £410,000 ($680,000) for 2009.</p>
<p>The firm saw revenue fall 14% to £184 million ($305 million).</p>
<p>The other British firms that have seen the largest drop in profits are <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/travers-smith/" target="_self">Travers Smith</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/clifford-chance/" target="_self">Clifford Chance</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/ashurst/" target="_self">Ashurst</a> and  <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/berwin-leighton-paisner/" target="_self">Berwin Leighton Paisner</a>.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/08/clifford-chance-leads-rough-year-for-u-k-firms/" title="Clifford Chance Leads Rough Year for U.K. Firms">Clifford Chance Leads Rough Year for U.K. Firms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/03/addleshaw-goddard-reports-30-drop-in-ppp/" title="Addleshaw Goddard Reports 30% Drop in PPP">Addleshaw Goddard Reports 30% Drop in PPP</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/01/profits-plummet-at-clifford-chance/" title="Profits Plummet at Clifford Chance">Profits Plummet at Clifford Chance</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/04/apax-to-hire-general-counsel/" title="Apax To Hire General Counsel">Apax To Hire General Counsel</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/09/morning-roundup-177/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/31/sj-berwin-ppp-plummets-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruden McClosky Lays Off 8 Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/03/ruden-mcclosky-lays-off-8-associates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/03/ruden-mcclosky-lays-off-8-associates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laid off staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruden McClosky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=14587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florida’s Ruden McClosky, which laid off two lawyers and 18 staff in May, and cut associate and non-equity partner compensation in June, has laid off an additional eight lawyers. The layoffs affected associates at the firm&#8217;s litigation, corporate and land-use practices. Ruden&#8217;s gross revenue fell by 9%, to $85.3 million in fiscal 2008. Fort Lauderdale, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-12113" title="rudenmcclosky_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/rudenmcclosky_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" />Florida’s <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/ruden-mcclosky/" target="_self">Ruden McClosky</a>, which laid off <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/08/ruden-mcclosky-lays-off-2-lawyers-18-staff/" target="_self">two lawyers and 18 staff</a> in May, and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/06/30/ruden-mcclosky-cuts-compensation/" target="_self">cut associate and non-equity partner compensation</a> in June, has laid off an additional eight lawyers.</p>
<p>The layoffs affected associates at the firm&#8217;s litigation, corporate and land-use practices.</p>
<p>Ruden&#8217;s gross revenue fell by 9%, to $85.3 million in fiscal 2008.</p>
<p>Fort Lauderdale, Florida’s Ruden McClosky is a law firm specializing in intellectual property law, litigation, banking &amp; finance law, and general corporate law.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/07/ruden-mcclosky-axes-16-staff/" title="Ruden McClosky Axes 16 Staff">Ruden McClosky Axes 16 Staff</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/16/pannone-lays-off-35-staff-goes-to-4-day-week/" title="Pannone Lays Off 35 Staff, Goes to 4-Day Week">Pannone Lays Off 35 Staff, Goes to 4-Day Week</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/08/ruden-mcclosky-lays-off-2-lawyers-18-staff/" title="Ruden McClosky Lays Off 2 Lawyers, 18 Staff">Ruden McClosky Lays Off 2 Lawyers, 18 Staff</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/bilzin-sumberg-cuts-attorneys-staff/" title="Bilzin Sumberg Cuts Attorneys, Staff">Bilzin Sumberg Cuts Attorneys, Staff</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/01/ruden-mcclosky-names-its-new-managing-partner/" title="Ruden McClosky Names its New Managing Partner">Ruden McClosky Names its New Managing Partner</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/03/ruden-mcclosky-lays-off-8-associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buchanan Ingersoll&#8217;s Revenue Down for 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/18/buchanan-ingersolls-revenue-down-for-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/18/buchanan-ingersolls-revenue-down-for-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am Law 200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headcount down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per equity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salaries frozen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer associates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buchanan Ingersoll &#38; Rooney saw its 2008 gross revenue fall by 3.3%, from $282.1 million in 2007. The Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based firm increased its revenue per lawyer by 2% from $554,000. The profits per equity partner fell 1.2% dip from $570,000. The average compensation for all partners decreased by 3.6% from $445,000 to $429,000. The firm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/buchananingersoll_160x120.jpg" alt="Buchanan Ingersoll &amp; Rooney" /><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/buchanan-ingersoll-rooney/" target="_self">Buchanan Ingersoll &amp; Rooney</a> saw its 2008 gross revenue fall by 3.3%, from $282.1 million in 2007.</p>
<p>The Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based firm increased its revenue per lawyer by 2% from $554,000. The profits per equity partner fell 1.2% dip from $570,000. The average compensation for all partners decreased by 3.6% from $445,000 to $429,000.</p>
<p>The firm expects a lower attorney headcount by the end of March after the annual performance review process. It is also leaving vacancies open. They cut 25 staff positions in November, and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/21/buchanan-ingersoll-continues-staff-cuts/" target="_self">30 in February</a>.</p>
<p>The firm saw a 5% drop in headcount in 2008, to 481 lawyers. Buchanan&#8217;s equity partner tier grew by one from 108 to 109, and the non-equity tier increased by 11.8% from 85 to 95.</p>
<p>The firm did not cut salaries in 2008 or so far in 2009, and paid bonuses &#8212; but <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/25/rumor-buchanan-ingersoll-freezing-salaries/" target="_self">salaries are frozen</a>. Buchanan Ingersoll will have a smaller summer class in 2009, and the firm&#8217;s starting associates will start on the normal date.</p>
<p>Buchanan, Ingersoll &amp; Rooney PC is a law firm and lobbying group. The firm has over 500 lawyers in sixteen offices nationwide, and was ranked 82nd on the National Law Journal’s 2008 list of the 250 largest law firms in the United States.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/10/revenues-down-ppp-up-at-buchanan/" title="Revenues Down, PPP up at Buchanan ">Revenues Down, PPP up at Buchanan </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/09/revenues-and-profits-down-at-schulte/" title="Revenues and Profits Down at Schulte ">Revenues and Profits Down at Schulte </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/15/baker-mckenzie-profits-down-17/" title="Baker &#038; McKenzie Profits Down 17%">Baker &#038; McKenzie Profits Down 17%</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/31/sj-berwin-ppp-plummets-50/" title="SJ Berwin PPP Plummets 50%">SJ Berwin PPP Plummets 50%</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/19/revenues-down-at-shearman-sterling/" title="Revenues Down at Shearman &#038; Sterling ">Revenues Down at Shearman &#038; Sterling </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/18/buchanan-ingersolls-revenue-down-for-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

