<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; profit per partner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/profit-per-partner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue and Profits up at Reed Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/revenue-and-profits-up-at-reed-smith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/revenue-and-profits-up-at-reed-smith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 financial numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 head count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovering economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reed Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=29005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 was a good year for Reed Smith, as revenues and profits, along with other key financial numbers all moved upward.  Gross revenue moved up 1.7% and the firm also increased its profit margin by a point.  And it managed to do this while increasing head count and billable hours, another indicator that the legal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/reedsmith_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4713" title="reedsmith_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/reedsmith_160x120.jpg" alt="reed smith" width="160" height="120" /></a>2010 was a good year for <a href="http://reedsmith.com/">Reed Smith</a>, as revenues and profits, along with other key financial numbers all moved upward.  Gross revenue moved up 1.7% and the firm also increased its profit margin by a point.  And it managed to do this while increasing head count and billable hours, another indicator that the legal market is beginning to thaw out.</p>
<p>Head count at Reed Smith ticked up slightly, from 1,433 to 1,449 lawyers.  Equity partnerships remained flats, but the non equity partner class grew by over 3%.  Profits per partner came in at $1.05 million.</p>
<p>Gregory Jordan, the firm&#8217;s managing partner, attributed the good year to the firm&#8217;s commitment to maintaining strong relationships with clients.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/01/31/weekend-review/" title="Weekend Review">Weekend Review</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/18/little-sympathy-given-by-aba-to-jobless-lawyers/" title="Little Sympathy Given By ABA To Jobless Lawyers">Little Sympathy Given By ABA To Jobless Lawyers</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/16/reed-smith-launches-european-and-middle-east-private-equity-practice/" title="Reed Smith Launches European and Middle East Private Equity Practice">Reed Smith Launches European and Middle East Private Equity Practice</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/revenue-and-profits-up-at-reed-smith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadwalader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the fourth consecutive year, revenues are down at Cadwalader.  That&#8217;s the bad news.  The good news is that profits per equity partner ticked up slightly for the second year in a row. Unlike many firms that have seen revenues fall while profits rose, Cadwalader did not have any significant cuts to operating expenses in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cadwalader_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1673" title="cadwalader_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cadwalader_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>For the fourth consecutive year, revenues are down at <a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/index.php?fset=3">Cadwalader</a>.  That&#8217;s the bad news.  The good news is that profits per equity partner ticked up slightly for the second year in a row.</p>
<p>Unlike many firms that have seen revenues fall while profits rose, Cadwalader did not have any significant cuts to operating expenses in 2010.  More specifically, headcount remained relatively static.  There were some major cuts in the previous 2 years, but in 2010 the headcount dropped by only three percent.  The firm attributes this years per partner profit growth to strategic planning decisions and points in particular at the acquisition of some top talent from other firms early in the year.</p>
<p>Established in 1792, Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP is one of the world’s leading international law firms, with offices in New York, London, Charlotte, Washington and Beijing.  Cadwalader serves a diverse client base, including many of the world’s top financial institutions, undertaking business in more than 50 countries on six continents.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/09/revenue-flat-for-locke-lord-in-2010/" title="Revenue Flat for Locke Lord in 2010">Revenue Flat for Locke Lord in 2010</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/revenue-and-profits-up-at-reed-smith/" title="Revenue and Profits up at Reed Smith">Revenue and Profits up at Reed Smith</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/morning-roundup-248/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/09/revenue-and-profit-up-at-dla-piper/" title="Revenue and Profit up at DLA Piper">Revenue and Profit up at DLA Piper</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barton winkour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changing legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dechert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second straight year, revenues at Dechert dropped in 2010 although profits continued to go up.  During the same period the number of equity partners held steady but total headcount dropped by over 8% from 2008 to 2009 and 12% from 2009 and 2010.  According to Dechert&#8217;s Chairman Barton Winkour, the headcount reduction occurred almost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1270" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/dechert_160x120.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1270" title="dechert_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/dechert_160x120.jpg" alt="dechert" width="160" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Dechert, llp</p></div>
<p>For the second straight year, revenues at <a href="http://www.dechert.com/">Dechert</a> dropped in 2010 although profits continued to go up.  During the same period the number of equity partners held steady but total headcount dropped by over 8% from 2008 to 2009 and 12% from 2009 and 2010.  According to Dechert&#8217;s Chairman Barton Winkour, the headcount reduction occurred almost entirely in mid 2009, but that means those lawyers were counted for half a year in 2009 and not at all in 2010.</p>
<p>Total profits at the firms were up close to 1% and profits per partner went from $1.96 million to $2.01 million.  Winkour attributes the increase in profitability to the firm&#8217;s ability to change its profile along with the changing legal landscape.  Reducing the number of lawyers involved in real estate law while adding a financial institutions practice group, for example.</p>
<p>With offices throughout the United States, Europe, and Asia, Dechert LLP is an international law firm focused on financial services and asset management, corporate and securities, tax law, business restructuring and reorganization, complex litigation and international arbitration, life sciences, labor and employment, intellectual property, and finance and real estate.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/09/revenue-flat-for-locke-lord-in-2010/" title="Revenue Flat for Locke Lord in 2010">Revenue Flat for Locke Lord in 2010</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/revenue-and-profits-up-at-reed-smith/" title="Revenue and Profits up at Reed Smith">Revenue and Profits up at Reed Smith</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/10/morning-roundup-248/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/09/revenue-and-profit-up-at-dla-piper/" title="Revenue and Profit up at DLA Piper">Revenue and Profit up at DLA Piper</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrick to Change Profit Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/15/orrick-to-change-profit-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/15/orrick-to-change-profit-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 04:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=23435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco based Orrick, Herrington &#38; Sutcliffe announced Wednesday that as of this year it will no longer publish its average profit per partner.  Profit per partner, long seen as the standard way to measure a law firm&#8217;s performance, was described as &#8220;no longer the right way to evaluate ourselves&#8221; by Orrick Chairman Ralph Baxter. Baxter went on to say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/orrick_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2544" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/orrick_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>San Francisco based Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe announced Wednesday that as of this year it will no longer publish its average profit per partner.  Profit per partner, long seen as the standard way to measure a law firm&#8217;s performance, was described as &#8220;no longer the right way to evaluate ourselves&#8221; by Orrick Chairman Ralph Baxter.</p>
<p>Baxter went on to say that the profit per partner metric gives clients a negative impression of the firm: &#8220;Clients don’t like the perception that law firms are organized to drive the income of its partners.”</p>
<p>In 2009, Orrick reported gross revenue of $847.5 million and profits per partner of $1.3 million.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/29/morning-roundup-167/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/28/orrick-and-akin-gump-in-merger-talks/" title="Orrick and Akin Gump in Merger Talks">Orrick and Akin Gump in Merger Talks</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/13/orrick-herrington-sutcliffe-llp-adds-five-partners-to-ny-acquisition-finance-practice/" title="Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/25/luce-forward-latest-to-form-foreclosure-practice/" title="Luce Forward Latest to Form Foreclosure Practice">Luce Forward Latest to Form Foreclosure Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/23/morning-roundup-198/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/15/orrick-to-change-profit-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue Down, Profits Up at Latham Watkins</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/17/revenue-down-profits-up-at-latham-watkins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/17/revenue-down-profits-up-at-latham-watkins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross revenue decrease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latham & Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawfirm layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-equity partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/17/revenue-down-profits-up-at-latham-watkins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While gross revenue at Latham &#38; Watkins decreased five percent to $1.821 billion in 2009, profit-per-partner managed to rise by five percent to $1.902 million. Helping to account for the rise in PPP was a big increase in net income from $786 million to $844 million. The numbers are a big improvement from 2008 when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/latham_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1531" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/latham_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>While gross revenue at <a href="http://www.lw.com">Latham &amp; Watkins </a>decreased five percent to $1.821 billion in 2009, profit-per-partner managed to rise by five percent to $1.902 million. Helping to account for the rise in PPP was a big increase in net income from $786 million to $844 million.</p>
<p>The numbers are a big improvement from 2008 when the firm’s profits were down 20.5 percent. That resulted in the layoffs of 190 associates and 250 staff in March of last year. Currently there are 1,880 attorneys at Latham Watkins, down from 2,102. The number of equity partners grew from 436 to 444 and the number of non-equity partners grew from 122 to 131.</p>
<p>Latham &amp; Watkins was founded in 1934 and has 29 offices around the world.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/27/latham-watkins-gives-us-black-thursday-ii-440-laid-off/" title="Black Thursday II: Latham &#038; Watkins Lays Off 440">Black Thursday II: Latham &#038; Watkins Lays Off 440</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/10/white-case-profits-fell-in-2008-despite-layoffs/" title="White &#038; Case Profits Fell in 2008, Despite Layoffs">White &#038; Case Profits Fell in 2008, Despite Layoffs</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/24/latham-watkins-announce-bonuses/" title="Latham &#038; Watkins Announces Bonuses">Latham &#038; Watkins Announces Bonuses</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/06/14/vault-2012-rankings-come-out-with-some-law-firms-ranking-the-same-and-others-moving-up/" title="Vault 2012 Rankings Come Out With Some Law Firms Ranking the Same, and Others Moving Up">Vault 2012 Rankings Come Out With Some Law Firms Ranking the Same, and Others Moving Up</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/04/11/latham-watkins-adds-six-partners-to-ip-practice/" title="Latham &amp; Watkins Adds Six Partners to IP Practice">Latham &amp; Watkins Adds Six Partners to IP Practice</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/17/revenue-down-profits-up-at-latham-watkins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenues and Profits Increase at Sheppard Mullin</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/09/revenues-and-profits-increase-at-sheppard-mullin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/09/revenues-and-profits-increase-at-sheppard-mullin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associate compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy halgren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per equity partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue per lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheppard mullin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=19935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles based firm Sheppard Mullin Richter &#38; Hampton reported slight increases in revenue and profits in 2009. Revenue increased 2.5% to $361 million. Profits per equity partner were $1.244 million, an increase of 3.5%. Revenue per lawyer though decline to $753,645, 1.8%. Last year the firm cut 25 lawyers in the first two months. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/sheppard_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3020" title="sheppard_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/sheppard_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Los Angeles based firm <a href="http://www.sheppardmullin.com/">Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton</a> reported slight increases in revenue and profits in 2009. Revenue increased 2.5% to $361 million. Profits per equity partner were $1.244 million, an increase of 3.5%. Revenue per lawyer though decline to $753,645, 1.8%.</p>
<p>Last year the firm cut 25 lawyers in the first two months. In January 2009 the firm also announced a freeze of associate compensation for the year. The freeze is no longer in effect. Sheppard Mullin chair Guy Halgren says that the demand for transactional and real estate work was low, the decline in those areas was offset by a demand for labor and employment, bankruptcy, government contracts and anti-trust practices.</p>
<p>Founded in 1927 Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton is a general practice firm with over 520 attorneys in 11 offices.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/17/profits-and-revenue-are-up-at-gibson-dunn/" title="Profits and Revenue Are up at Gibson Dunn">Profits and Revenue Are up at Gibson Dunn</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/09/morning-roundup-226/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/09/sheppard-mullin-adds-five-attorneys-to-labor-and-employment-practice-group/" title="Sheppard Mullin Adds Five Attorneys to Labor and Employment Practice Group">Sheppard Mullin Adds Five Attorneys to Labor and Employment Practice Group</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/25/2009-goes-just-fine-for-duane-morris/" title="2009 Just Fine For Duane Morris">2009 Just Fine For Duane Morris</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/26/revenue-and-profits-increase-at-cahill/" title="Revenue and Profits Increase at Cahill ">Revenue and Profits Increase at Cahill </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/09/revenues-and-profits-increase-at-sheppard-mullin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Weiss Profits Up</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/01/paul-weiss-profits-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/01/paul-weiss-profits-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brad karp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[per partner profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restructuring practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=19606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp, 2009 was &#8220;the most profitable year in our firm&#8217;s history&#8221;. Not bad for a year marked by recession and uncertainty in the legal market and a nice repeat of 2008&#8242;s growth. What&#8217;s most remarkable is that Paul Weiss dramatically increased profits without resorting to layoffs &#8211; in fact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/paulweiss_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4833" title="paulweiss_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/paulweiss_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>According to <a href="http://www.paulweiss.com/">Paul Weiss</a> chairman Brad Karp, 2009 was &#8220;the most profitable year in our firm&#8217;s history&#8221;.  Not bad for a year marked by recession and uncertainty in the legal market and a nice repeat of <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/25/paul-weiss-enjoys-solid-2008/">2008&#8242;s growth</a>.  What&#8217;s most remarkable is that Paul Weiss dramatically increased profits without resorting to layoffs &#8211; in fact, the attorney head count inched up by six to 653.</p>
<p>Gross revenues were down slightly, but per partner profits rose from $2.65 million to $2.69 million.  The increase was driven by a strong year for the restructuring and litigation practices.  The firm represents several large financial institutions that have taken some heat over the last year, like Citigroup, Bank of America, and JP Morgan/Bear Stearns.  With more legal action on that front expected in 2010, the firm expects to have another good year.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/01/revenue-and-profits-down-ppp-up-at-dickstein-shapiro/" title="Revenue and Profits down, PPP up at Dickstein Shapiro">Revenue and Profits down, PPP up at Dickstein Shapiro</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/24/profits-revenue-up-at-jenner-block/" title="Profits, Revenue Up at Jenner &amp; Block">Profits, Revenue Up at Jenner &amp; Block</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/04/revenues-and-profits-up-at-bingham-mccutchen/" title="Revenues and Profits up at Bingham McCutchen">Revenues and Profits up at Bingham McCutchen</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/04/morning-roundup-81/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/24/revenue-declines-at-arent-fox/" title="Revenue Declines Slightly at Arent Fox">Revenue Declines Slightly at Arent Fox</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/01/paul-weiss-profits-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadwalader Profits per Partner Increase By 28%</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/20/cadwalader-profits-per-partner-increase-by-28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/20/cadwalader-profits-per-partner-increase-by-28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lay off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=19164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cadwalader, Wickersham &#38; Taft reported a 28% increase in profits per partner for 2009, marking the first per partner increase for the firm since 2007. However, this increase may be attributed to an almost 21% loss in the number of equity partners in the firm and massive associate layoffs. Cadwalader had 61 equity partners at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cadwalader_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1673" title="cadwalader_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cadwalader_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a><a href="http://www.cadwalader.com/">Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft</a> reported a 28% increase in profits per partner for 2009, marking the first per partner increase for the firm since 2007. However, this increase may be attributed to an almost 21% loss in the number of equity partners in the firm and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/11/amlaw-cadwalader-still-1-for-layoffs/">massive associate layoffs</a>. Cadwalader had 61 equity partners at the end of August 2009, compared to 77 a year earlier.</p>
<p>Gross revenue dropped 10% while net icome increased 1.38% to $147 million.  The firm reported gross revenue of $456.5 million for 2009.  In 2008 the firm announced the layoffs of 131 associates. In early 2009 a further 25 lawyers received layoffs and in July 2009 34 lawyers were offered a <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/07/07/cadwalader-offers-sabbaticals-to-34-associates/">one-year sabbatical</a>. Cadwalader reported 457 lawyers at the end of August 2009, down 12.6% from a year earlier when they had 523.</p>
<p>Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft was founded in New York City in 1792 and is one of the worlds leading financial law firms. Its practice includes the areas of capital markets, bankruptcy, real estate, insurance and income tax. It has offices located in New York, London, Washington, D.C., Charlotte and Beijing.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/19/election-of-deborah-read-at-thompson-hine-as-managing-partner-puts-her-in-small-circle-of-women-at-top-of-major-law-firms/" title="Election of Deborah Read at Thompson Hine as Managing Partner Puts Her in Small Circle of Women at Top of Major Law Firms">Election of Deborah Read at Thompson Hine as Managing Partner Puts Her in Small Circle of Women at Top of Major Law Firms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/13/orrick-herrington-sutcliffe-llp-adds-five-partners-to-ny-acquisition-finance-practice/" title="Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/26/stroock-stroock-lavan-adds-two-partners/" title="Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan Adds Two Partners">Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan Adds Two Partners</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/08/morning-roundup-200/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/15/orrick-to-change-profit-reporting/" title="Orrick to Change Profit Reporting">Orrick to Change Profit Reporting</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/01/20/cadwalader-profits-per-partner-increase-by-28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Firms Feel the Pinch</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/12/uk-firms-feel-the-pinch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/12/uk-firms-feel-the-pinch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic circle law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PricewaterhouseCoopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk legal economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=17845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The top 100 UK firms by revenue dropped saw profits decline by an average of 30% last year, according to a new report out from PricewaterhouseCoopers. The largest decline in income came in the second tier of firms, those listed at #11-25, where partner per partner profits were down by 28%. Firms in the &#8220;magic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pwc_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6358" title="pwc_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pwc_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>The top 100 UK firms by revenue dropped saw profits decline by an average of 30% last year, according to a new report out from <a href="http://www.pwc.co.uk/index.html">PricewaterhouseCoopers</a>.  The largest decline in income came in the second tier of firms, those listed at #11-25, where partner per partner profits were down by 28%.  Firms in the &#8220;magic circle&#8221;, the top ten, had per partner profits ranging from 850,000 to 1.4 million pounds, which was still a 21% drop from last year.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-cadwalader/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Cadwalader</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/07/revenue-down-profits-up-at-dechert/" title="Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert">Revenue Down, Profits Up at Dechert</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/13/morning-roundup-20/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/30/quinn-emanuel-urquhart-sullivan-posts-excellent-financial-results/" title="Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &#038; Sullivan Posts Excellent Financial Results">Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &#038; Sullivan Posts Excellent Financial Results</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/16/job-market-for-new-grads-edges-up/" title="Job Market for New Grads Edges up">Job Market for New Grads Edges up</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/12/uk-firms-feel-the-pinch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

