<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; partnerships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/partnerships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Group Asks NALP For More Accurate Partnership Info</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/08/group-asks-nalp-for-more-accurate-partnership-info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/08/group-asks-nalp-for-more-accurate-partnership-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biglaw firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fernande duffly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nalp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nalp recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association for Law Placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-equity partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=22430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citing a desire to better understand law firm diversity, a group of scholars and legal professionals sent a letter asking the NALP to include non-equity partners in information on Biglaw firms it disseminates to the public. The 75-strong group, led by author and Massachusetts Appeals Court Judge Fernande Duffly, believes adding information on non-equity partners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nalp_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7518" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nalp_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Citing a desire to better understand law firm diversity, a group of scholars and legal professionals sent a letter asking the NALP to include non-equity partners in information on Biglaw firms it disseminates to the public.</p>
<p>The 75-strong group, led by author and Massachusetts Appeals Court Judge Fernande Duffly, believes adding information on non-equity partners would give a better picture on diversity at member firms of the NALP. The letter notes an equal number of men and women graduate law school, but women comprise only 16% to 17% of equity partners at major law firms. Minorities account for only 5.4% of law firm partners, according to the letter.</p>
<p>“While many law firms have taken steps to address this problem, progress has been slow and difficult to measure. The continuing disparities at the equity partnership level have a significant and far-reaching impact on the legal profession, including by reducing the number of women and minority attorneys who are positioned to apply for judgeships or assume leadership roles in the community,” the letter states.</p>
<p>The NALP, formerly known as the National Association for Law Placement, said earlier this year it would not be able to provide such information because law firms were “unable or unwiling to provide the information requested in the new equity/non-equity partner categories.”</p>
<p>According to the organization, many firms said they would not provide such information because of privacy and confidentiality issues.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/07/morning-roundup-224/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/05/nalp-cites-recession-as-likely-factor-in-historic-decline-in-law-firm-diversity/" title="NALP Cites Recession as Likely Factor in &#8216;Historic&#8217; Decline in Law Firm Diversity">NALP Cites Recession as Likely Factor in &#8216;Historic&#8217; Decline in Law Firm Diversity</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/17/nalp-reports-better-employment-outlook-for-recent-law-graduates/" title="NALP Reports Better Employment Outlook for Recent Law Graduates">NALP Reports Better Employment Outlook for Recent Law Graduates</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/06/28/morning-roundup-171/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/06/25/nalp-predicts-weak-jobs-market-for-law-grads/" title="NALP Predicts Weak Jobs Market for Law Grads">NALP Predicts Weak Jobs Market for Law Grads</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/08/group-asks-nalp-for-more-accurate-partnership-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firms Tighten up in Partnership Promotions</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/30/firms-tighten-up-in-partnership-promotions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/30/firms-tighten-up-in-partnership-promotions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associate promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[davis polk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fried frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gibson dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirkland & Ellis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latham & Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayer Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul hasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Hastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proskauer rose llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ropes & Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skadden Arps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wachtell lipton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=18079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a year that has been notable for salary cuts, layoffs, associate deferrals and smaller bonuses, it should come as no surprise that promotions to partner are also down across the board. Profits are down, and firms are reluctant to increase the number of slices of the shrinking pie. Although not every firm has announced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/partners_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-867" title="partners_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/partners_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>In a year that has been notable for salary cuts, layoffs, associate deferrals and smaller bonuses, it should come as no surprise that promotions to partner are also down across the board.  Profits are down, and firms are reluctant to increase the number of slices of the shrinking pie.  Although not every firm has announced this years promotions yet, plenty have.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a sampling of prominent firms that have announced a smaller partnership class this year compared to last year: Cleary Gottlieb, Latham &amp; Watkins, Ropes &amp; Gray, Proskauer Rose,  Wachtell Lipton Rosen &amp; Katz, Skadden Arps, Davis Polk, Paul Hastings, Gibson Dunn, Mayer Brown, Kirkland &amp; Ellis.   The list of firms bucking the trend is much smaller and those that have promoted larger classes have promoted only marginally more partners while some of the firms with smaller classes have cut promotions by as much as half.  Fried Frank for example promoted seven new partners, up from five the previous year, but did so in a year where its total number of attorneys shrank by 26%.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/06/23-new-partners-at-latham-watkins/" title="23 New Partners at Latham &#038; Watkins">23 New Partners at Latham &#038; Watkins</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/02/morning-roundup-59/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/07/18/not-guilty-is-the-plea-of-former-kirkland-ellis-partner-in-tax-fraud-case/" title="&#8216;Not Guilty&#8217; is the Plea of Former Kirkland &#038; Ellis Partner in Tax Fraud Case">&#8216;Not Guilty&#8217; is the Plea of Former Kirkland &#038; Ellis Partner in Tax Fraud Case</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/31/paul-hastings-adds-biotech-litigation-team/" title="Paul Hastings Adds Biotech Litigation Team">Paul Hastings Adds Biotech Litigation Team</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/05/latham-adds-laterals-in-d-c-houston/" title="Latham Adds Laterals in D.C., Houston">Latham Adds Laterals in D.C., Houston</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/11/30/firms-tighten-up-in-partnership-promotions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

