<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; mojave cross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/mojave-cross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Salazar v Buono Argued Today at Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/07/salazar-v-buono-argued-today-at-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/07/salazar-v-buono-argued-today-at-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[establishment clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mojave cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national parks service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salazar v buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunrise rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vfw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=17270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court today heard arguments in Salazar v Buono, a highly anticipated establishment clause case. Many observers thought the Court might decide the case on standing, leaving the pricklier 1st amendment issue alone, but based on oral arguments that seems unlikely. The case was brought by a retired National Parks Service employee who objected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/salazarcross.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-17271" title="salazarcross" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/salazarcross.jpg" alt="" width="226" height="170" /></a>The Court today heard arguments in <a href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Salazar_v._Buono">Salazar v Buono</a>, a highly anticipated establishment clause case.  Many observers thought the Court might decide the case on standing, leaving the pricklier 1st amendment issue alone, but based on oral arguments that seems unlikely.  The case was brought by a retired National Parks Service employee who objected to a cross on park lands that serves as a war memorial for World War One veterans.  Although the cross was originally erected privately and continues to be maintained privately, it stood for years on land owned by the government.  To protect it from 1st amendment claims made by the retired employee, Congress voted to sell a small patch of land, including the rock on which the cross stands, to the VFW.  At issue now is whether or not doing so removed the establishment clause issue.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/21/monterey-cross-cut-down-by-vandals/" title="Monterey Cross Cut Down by Vandals">Monterey Cross Cut Down by Vandals</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/supreme-court-to-decice-on-mojave-cross/" title="Supreme Court To Decide On Mojave Cross">Supreme Court To Decide On Mojave Cross</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/14/supreme-court-will-rule-on-affordable-care-act/" title="Supreme Court Will Rule on Affordable Care Act">Supreme Court Will Rule on Affordable Care Act</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/09/16/u-s-supreme-court-stays-execution-of-man-attorneys-say-was-unfairly-sentenced-due-to-question-about-race-during-trial/" title="U.S. Supreme Court Stays Execution of Man Attorneys Say Was Unfairly Sentenced Due to Question About Race During Trial">U.S. Supreme Court Stays Execution of Man Attorneys Say Was Unfairly Sentenced Due to Question About Race During Trial</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/07/06/sotomayor-talks-about-her-diabetes-with-kids/" title="Sotomayor talks about her diabetes with kids">Sotomayor talks about her diabetes with kids</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/07/salazar-v-buono-argued-today-at-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court To Decide On Mojave Cross</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/supreme-court-to-decice-on-mojave-cross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/supreme-court-to-decice-on-mojave-cross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross honoring fallen soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mojave cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mojave national preserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Park Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=7410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether or not a cross honoring fallen soldiers in the Mojave National Preserve is a violation of the 1st Amendment.  It will be the first time that the court will hear a case regarding “an establishment of religion” with John Roberts as the Chief Justice. The current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mojave-desert-cross.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7412" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mojave-desert-cross.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="174" /></a></p>
<p>The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether or not a cross honoring fallen soldiers in the Mojave National Preserve is a violation of the 1st Amendment.  It will be the first time that the court will hear a case regarding “an establishment of religion” with John Roberts as the Chief Justice.</p>
<p>The current cross is eight feet tall, though a smaller wooden cross was erected by the Veterans of Foreign Wars in 1934 and was maintained by the National Park Service as a war memorial.</p>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union objected to the cross and filed a suit on behalf of Frank Buono, a former Park Service employee.  The suit noted that the government declined to build a Buddhist shrine near the cross.</p>
<p>The case appeared before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  The court ruled in favor of the ACLU, declaring the cross an “impermissible government endorsement of religion.”</p>
<p>The government has questioned Buono’s right to challenge the cross.  Mr. Buono lives in Oregon and, according to government lawyers, suffers no obvious harm because of the cross’ existence.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/25/supreme-court-rules-against-utah-teachers-union-in-political-speech-case/" title="Supreme Court Rules Against Utah Teacher&#8217;s Union In Political Speech Case">Supreme Court Rules Against Utah Teacher&#8217;s Union In Political Speech Case</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/30/federal-appeals-court-rules-telecommunications-companies-have-legal-immunity-in-connection-with-nsa-program/" title="Federal Appeals Court Rules Telecommunications Companies Have Legal Immunity in Connection with NSA Program">Federal Appeals Court Rules Telecommunications Companies Have Legal Immunity in Connection with NSA Program</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/23/pagan-nc-mother-cries-foul-when-son-comes-home-from-school-with-bible/" title="Pagan NC Mother Cries Foul When Son Comes Home From School with Bible">Pagan NC Mother Cries Foul When Son Comes Home From School with Bible</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/01/25/six-justices-to-attend-sotu/" title="Six Justices to Attend SOTU">Six Justices to Attend SOTU</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/13/morning-roundup-141/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/supreme-court-to-decice-on-mojave-cross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

