<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; Los Angeles Unified School District</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/los-angeles-unified-school-district/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LA County DA Not Immune to Retaliation Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/16/la-county-da-not-immune-to-retaliation-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/16/la-county-da-not-immune-to-retaliation-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$200 million school construction project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belmont Learning Complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Eng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputy district attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Ammendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Unified School District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Geragos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misdemeanors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cooley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=3889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley is not entitled to qualified immunity from a retaliation claim filed by a deputy DA who spoke publicly about problems tied to an investigation of a failed $200 million school construction project. David Eng served on a task [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/belmont_233x175.jpg" alt="Belmont Learning Center" />The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley is not entitled to qualified immunity from a retaliation claim filed by a deputy DA who spoke publicly about problems tied to an investigation of a failed $200 million school construction project.</p>
<p>David Eng served on a task force to investigate fraud and environmental crimes associated with construction of the Los Angeles Unified School District&#8217;s Belmont Learning Complex, which was halted in 1999. He was demoted and falsely charged with a misdemeanor relating to the misuse of office computers after concluding, as part of the task force, that no crimes had been committed. Cooley was elected in 2000 on a campaign to prosecute individuals tied to the Belmont project.</p>
<p>The 9th Circuit found that Eng was within his First Amendment rights when he blew the whistle on a task force colleague who had leaked to the IRS that the school district had committed fraud when purchasing the Belmont facility. The panel also found that a lawyer Eng hired to defend him against the misdemeanor charges, Mark Geragos, was within his First Amendment rights to speak about the retaliation against Eng in a 2003 Los Angeles Times article.</p>
<p>The panel held that &#8220;the full range of adverse employment action appears to have been a politically-motivated effort to silence Eng, who stood to embarrass Cooley by undermining a central plank in his campaign platform.&#8221;</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/06/10/layoffs-for-sacramento-da-office/" title="Layoffs for Sacramento DA Office">Layoffs for Sacramento DA Office</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/06/11/boulder-county-da-fires-6-prosecutors/" title="Boulder County DA Fires 6 Prosecutors">Boulder County DA Fires 6 Prosecutors</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2008/12/27/union-defends-jobs-of-deputy-district-attorneys/" title="Union Defends Jobs of Deputy District Attorneys">Union Defends Jobs of Deputy District Attorneys</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/17/myri-serra-disbarred-for-a-felony-and-misdemenor-harassment-charges/" title="Myrl Serra Disbarred For A Felony And Misdemenor Harassment Charges">Myrl Serra Disbarred For A Felony And Misdemenor Harassment Charges</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/04/11/irs-pays-out-first-award-under-new-provisions-of-whistleblower-program/" title="IRS Pays Out First Award Under New Provisions of Whistleblower Program">IRS Pays Out First Award Under New Provisions of Whistleblower Program</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/16/la-county-da-not-immune-to-retaliation-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

