<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aostler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Overy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alston & bird llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arnold and porter llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker & McKenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baker botts llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker Hostetler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bingham mccutchen llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan cave llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadwalader wickersham & taft llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cahill gordon & reindel llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chadbourne & parke llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clifford chance llp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooley LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=32781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms survey asked attorneys about their experiences working for 94 different law firms. While the survey asked a variety of questions regarding associate life, vacation time, benefits, and firm demands, one of the more interesting components involved the salary and bonus assessment. What follows is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms survey asked attorneys about their experiences working for 94 different law firms. While the survey asked a variety of questions regarding associate life, vacation time, benefits, and firm demands, one of the more interesting components involved the salary and bonus assessment. What follows is a concise summary of the survey&#8217;s results with regards four separate areas: salary and bonus amounts for 2011; salary scale; the target bonus amounts for 2010; and the factors that go into determining bonuses for each firm.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table style="border: 1px solid #000000;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law Firm Name</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2011 Salary &amp; Bonuses</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Salary Scale</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2010 Target Bonus Level</span></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bonus Factors</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &amp; Feld have salaries that start at $160,000. The salary structure in Houston offices is a year behind market trends. Typically, the firm follows lock-step bonuses, even paying the New York market bonus in December 2010. Some associates also receive a $10,000 merit bonus based on number of hours worked.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,<br />
$10k,<br />
$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Allen &amp; Overy LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salary is $160,000. Salary and bonus systems are both &#8220;lockstep.&#8221; Billable hours have no bearing on bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Alston &amp; Bird LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">$160,000 starting salary for new associates. Merit considerations come into play when determining bonus amounts including billable hours. Top performers in first through fourth years can earn up to $25,000 extra. Top performers in fifth year + can earn up to $50,000 extra.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k,</p>
<p>$140k,</p>
<p>$145k,</p>
<p>$155k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Bonuses are 4%, 7.5%, or 12% of salary at the following billable hours markers: 1,900, 2,000, and 2,100.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Arnold &amp; Porter LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Arnold &amp; Porter uses lockstep salaries based on class year with a base starting at $160,000. Subjective factors and billable hours determine bonus amounts. 2010 bonuses were considered &#8220;above-market,&#8221; at $10,000 to $50,000 on average with a maximum of $70,000.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses including quality of work and work quality in relation to seniority. Qualifying factors are not transparent but the basics include: 1,800 billable hours and pro bono work.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker &amp; McKenzie </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">The Baker &amp; McKenzie firm has a lockstep salary system with some exceptions given for individuals based on performance. Starting salaries are $160,000 except for Miami offices, where it is $130,000. Bonus amounts are considered to be below market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker Botts L.L.P. </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary is merit-based at Baker Botts. The four salary categories are determined by number of years with the firm (1, 2-3, 4-6, and 7+), but seniority promotions are not automatic. Starting salary is $160,000.  Texas offices have the highest bonus incentives. Bonuses are paid in March. Federal District and Circuit Court clerkship bonuses are given in the amounts of $35,000 and $50,000 to Texan and non-Texan offices, respectively.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$185k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Baker Hostetler LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries fall between $115,000 and $160,000 then slip into a hybrid lockstep system than combines billable hours, performance, and other factors into consideration. Individual salaries do not always match market levels, nor do bonuses, which are largely discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">5% bonus administered after completing 1,950 hours. Additional 12.5% bonus is possible, though rare, and based on performance.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bingham McCutchen LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Bingham McCutchen follows a hybrid lockstep system that determines base salary levels. Starting salary is $160,000. Bonuses are at market level but not paid out until March. Judicial clerkship bonuses are also available.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,<br />
$170k,<br />
$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,<br />
$10k,<br />
$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bryan Cave LLP </span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary at Bryan Cave in coastal and Chicago offices is $145,000 for the first year, $150,000 for the second year, and $155,000 for the third year. Base salary is lower in all other offices. In general, compensation is determined by lockstep and merit-based factors. Bonuses are also tiered but it is unclear how much members will receive each year. Judicial clerkship bonuses are available in some cases.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though this process is not transparent. Bonus tiers reside at 1,950, 2,100, 2,250, and 2,400 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft have a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 for all offices except Charlotte, which starts at $130,000. Spring bonuses in 2011 matched the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,<br />
$170k,<br />
$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though merit-based factors are only considered after 1,900 billable hours have been logged.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cahill offers a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 and stays consistent depending on the associate&#8217;s class. Bonuses were distributed in payments ranging between $15,000 to $20,000 in December 2010 and another at market scale in January 2011. Mid-year bonuses were also paid in June 2011 for $5,000 to $25,000.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chadbourne &amp; Parke LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Chadbourne &amp; Parke has a starting salary of $160,000 and bonuses that meet the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">A lockstep system is used for setting salaries at Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &amp; Hamilton with a base of $160,000. They match market scale bonuses across the board.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are determined by class year of the associate.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Clifford Chance LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Clifford Chance uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses meet the market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">The process by which bonuses are determined is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cooley LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cooley uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 and meet the market level. Bonuses usually meet the market scale but a lack of overall transparency makes it difficult to gauge average amounts.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Some of these factors are believed to include performance, client relationships, quality, and partnership potential, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Covington &amp; Burling</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Covington &amp; Burling use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses are lower than similar firms though the firm has a reputation for contributing to a better quality of life for its associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses though subjective factors may contribute like pro bono work, recruiting, involvement, performance, etc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. The firm sets and surpasses market bonus amounts for both end-of-year and spring bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Crowell &amp; Moring LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Crowell &amp; Moring use both a lockstep system and merit-based approach to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonus amounts vary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 billable hours must be logged for bonus eligibility.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell use a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. However, paychecks are only administered once a month. Bonuses match the market and came in at the top of the market for spring bonuses in 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Debevoise &amp; Plimpton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Debevoise &amp; Plimpton uss a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses matched market levels in 2009 and 2010, while their spring bonuses for 2011 came in at the top of the market on the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dechert LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dechert uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 in most markets and at $145,000 for Charlotte, Philadelphia, Princeton, and Hartford offices. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale for standard performance and were doubled for those who were extremely productive.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$152k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200K,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,950 billable hours nets a Cravath-level bonus. More hours increases this amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dewey &amp; LeBoeuf LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dewey &amp; LeBoeuf uses a lockstep system for determining salaries, which start at $160,000 and increase each year after that. Bonuses are in keeping with the Cravath scale, but are paid out in March or April.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Associates that billed 2,000 hours qualify for bonuses with additional bonuses available for high performance.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dickstein Shapiro LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dickstein Shapiro has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000. After that, salaries are below market level. By the third year, associates can work for higher hourly pay. Bonuses are paid out in December.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$165k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. After 2,100 hours, the bonus level increases every 100 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DLA Piper</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">DLA Piper has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000 in most markets and $145,000 in smaller markets.  A newer compensation structure features three tiers that are separated by 2-4 years and accession through the ranks is based on performance. 15% of the salary is awarded at the end of the year, based on a performance review. If no salary is withheld, bonuses are given.  Income and bonuses are generally viewed as below market levels. In previous years, bonuses ranged from $5,000 to $50,000. Top performers now receive market-level bonuses.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. An end of year performance review determines if associates receive their 15% withheld portion of their salary. A rating of 4 or 3 warrants this; a rating of 2 warrants a 5% payment; and a rating of 1 warrants no withheld salary or bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dorsey &amp; Whitney LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Dorsey &amp; Whitney uses a merit-based compensation system. Starting salary is $145,000 in California and New York and $110,000 to $120,000 in smaller markets. Bonuses are behind market scale discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$110k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though they are mostly discretionary. They are not determined in a transparent way.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Edwards Angell Palmer &amp; Dodge have a lockstep system for starting salaries at $145,000 in New York and Boston and $125,000 in Providence. Senior associates have a range of salaries, determined by unclear means. 10% of salary relies on meeting the minimum billable hours. Bonuses are less than market scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fenwick &amp; West LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries at Fenwich &amp; West are $160,000 at all offices. Bonuses are typically lower than market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,800 and 1,950 billable hour tracks are available for different salary and bonus potential.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fish &amp; Richardson P.C.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fish &amp; Richardson salaries are lockstep and start at $160,000. Bonuses ranged from $17,500 to above $50,000 in 2009 and even higher bonuses in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 nets a bonus with every additional 100 hours increasing this amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Foley &amp; Lardner LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Foley &amp; Lardner has a hybrid lockstep system with a tiered system for bonuses. Starting salary is $160,000 in major markets and between $110,000 and $145,000 in smaller markets. Deferred salary payment of $15,000 is made to those who work over 1,950 hours. Lockstep system dissolves after the fourth year. Bonuses vary and ranged from $0 to $50,000 in 2009.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent and largely discretionary.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer uses a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Non-U.S. offices moved to a milestone system in 2011 based on performance only. U.S. office bonuses follow market standards but actually came in at the top of the Cravath scale for spring bonuses in February 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &amp; Jacobson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &amp; Jacobson have a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses match market levels and reached up to $35,000 in 2009. Spring bonuses in 2011 matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. A minimum of 1,950 hours must be logged to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fulbright &amp; Jaworski L.L.P.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Fulbright &amp; Jaworski have a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonus amounts vary but fall short of market standards.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Hourly bonuses are given to those that log 2,000 and above with additional amounts given to those every additional 100 hours. Discretionary bonuses are also awarded based on merit.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">A lockstep scale is used to determine salaries at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher, and start at $160,000. Bonus amounts are in line with market levels for year&#8217;s end and in the spring.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Logging over 1,950 qualifies associates for bonuses. Higher billable hours increase bonus amounts considerably. The process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Goodwin Procter LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Goodwin Procter uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine base salary levels, which start at $160,000, while including flexibility for merit-based assessments. Bonuses met the Cravath level, though individual associates complained about a lack of transparency in the assessment process. Spring bonuses did match the Cravath level in 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Greenberg Traurig, LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Greenberg Traurig has a lockstep and merit-based system to determine salaries. Both salaries and bonuses are discretionary, leading to a tendency toward the firm playing favorites. Bonuses fall behind market levels and many associates don&#8217;t receive a bonus at all.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hogan Lovells LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salary is determined by billable hours. Those that bill 1,800 hours receive a below-market salary and those that bill above 1,950 receive a market-level salary. Bonuses match the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Those that bill 2,000 hours receive a Cravath-level bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Holland &amp; Knight LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Holland &amp; Knight has a hybrid lockstep system, with salaries starting at $145,000. After that, salary is determined by seniority, billable hours, profitability, and quality of work. Bonuses were awarded in 2011 for performance at a rate of $2,500 for first through fourth year associates and $5,000 for fifth year and up associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hughes Hubbard &amp; Reed LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Hughes, Hubbard &amp; Reed has a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 and is based on subjective variables after that including billable hours, pro bono work, contribution to the firm, and quality, though the reviews are not very detailed and only sub-par reviews cause an associate to miss out on a salary raise. Bonuses were at above-market levels in 2009 but dropped to market level in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses. At least 1,950 hours are required to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Hunton &amp; Williams LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Hunton &amp; Williams have a lockstep system and base salaries that start at $145,000 or $160,000 depending on the size of the market. Salary after that is determined by seniority and merit-based factors. Bonuses fall behind the market levels and are not distributed until May or June.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. It is thought that 2,100 to 2,200 hours are required to qualify for bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Irell &amp; Manella LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Irell &amp; Manella has starting salaries that start at $160,000. Bonuses fell between $15,000 and $70,000 in 2009 and doubled Cravath-level bonuses in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and class year determine bonuses, with a minimum of 2,000 hours required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jackson Lewis LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jackson Lewis has different base salaries depending on the market, the lowest of which is $125,000. This is way below market levels. Bonuses are also below market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k,</p>
<p>$130k,</p>
<p>$135k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jenner &amp; Block LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jenner &amp; Block has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000 that switches to merit-based after the first year. Salary determinations are highly subjective as are bonuses. Bonuses ranged from $2,000 to $38,000 in 2009 and has fallen behind market levels in subsequent years.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Jones Day</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Jones Day has a merit-based salary system that includes factors like billable hours, pro bono, contribution, quality of work, and business development. Starting salaries range from $145,000 to $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses are incorporated into salaries depending on each associate&#8217;s contribution. Typically, bonuses fall above market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">K&amp;L Gates</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">K&amp;L Gates has starting salaries that fall between $115,000 and $160,000, depending on market size, then slip into a merit-based system that takes into account billable hours, quality of work, contribution, performance, and other factors. Bonuses are discretionary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. 1,950 hours are required to qualify for a bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kasowitz, Benson, Torres &amp; Friedman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kasowitz, Benson, Torres &amp; Friedman has lockstep starting salaries of $160,000. It keeps with market levels for bonus amounts, though does not exceed it.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Factors determining bonus amounts are not clear.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Katten Muchin Rosenman has a lockstep salary system that starts at $130,000 and $160,000 depending on the market. After that, salaries are based on class year, billable hours, and performance. Bonus amounts fall behind market levels, however.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kaye Scholer LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kaye Scholer has a lockstep starting salary of $160,000. Bonus amounts follow market trends. Qualifying associates in 2009 received between $20,000 and $40,000. Cravath-level bonuses were awarded in 2010.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses. 1,950 hours (1,800 billable) is the minimum requirement.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kilpatrick Townsend &amp; Stockton LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kilpatrick Townsend &amp; Stockton has a merit-based system to determine salary. Starting salary is $135,000 to $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses follow market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">King &amp; Spalding LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">King &amp; Spalding has a lockstep system for determining salaries, which start at $135,000 and $160,000 depending on the market. Bonuses lag behind market standards but a lack of billable hours minimum compensates for this fact. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$135k,</p>
<p>$140k,</p>
<p>$145k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>165k,</p>
<p>$175k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$190k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$22k,</p>
<p>$22k,</p>
<p>$27k,</p>
<p>$30k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonuses, though discretionary factors can come into play. A minimum of 2,050 hours is required</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kirkland &amp; Ellis LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Kirkland &amp; Ellis has a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Double the market value bonuses are available to those that bill high hours.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Above 2,200 garners increased bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Knobbe Martens Olson &amp; Bear LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Knobbe Martens Olson &amp; Bear has a lockstep system to determine starting salaries. Base salaries begin at $140,000. Bonuses lag behind market levels because they&#8217;re based on the number of hours billed that fall above the quota.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$140k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are based on billable hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kramer Levin Naftalis &amp; Frankel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Karmer Levin Naftalis &amp; Frankel has a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels, though they are usually not paid out until February.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonus amounts. 2,150 hours are needed for a full bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Latham &amp; Watkins LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Latham &amp; Watkins have a lockstep system that starts at $160,000. Bonuses are typically above market levels, sometimes so much as double. Spring bonuses were also awarded in 2011 that met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required to earn the base bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Linklaters</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Linklaters has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses are lockstep as well, and fall in line with market levels. 2011 spring bonuses fell below Cravath scale level, however.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265K</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Manatt Phelps &amp; Phillips</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Manatt Phelps &amp; Phillips uses a hybrid lockstep system with salaries starting at $125,000 and bonuses that fall below market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$125k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mayer Brown LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Mayer Brown has a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 for the first class year and has a range of salaries for every class year after that depending on billable hours, quality, pro bono, and other factors. Bonuses match market levels. End of year 2010 and spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours determine bonus eligibility with a minimum of 2,000.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">McDermott, Will &amp; Emery</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting pay at McDermott, Will &amp; Emery is $145,000 though a merit-based system was implemented in 2011 that made it so associates only received their full pay if they worked 2,000 billable hours. Bonus amounts meet market levels and they aren&#8217;t awarded until March.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">McGuireWoods LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">McGuireWoods uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine salary amounts. Starting salary is $130,000 with assessments each year after resulting in pay raises based on billable hours, pro bono, quality, performance, and other factors. Bonuses tend to be below market levels though working more hours will garner a higher payout.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$130k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &amp; McCloy LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Milbank,Tweed, Hadley &amp; McCloy uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Year-end and spring bonuses for 2010 and 2011 met the Cravath level.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Morgan, Lewis &amp; Bockius LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Morgan Lewis uses a hybrid lockstep system with starting salaries at $145,000 in most markets. Bonuses keep up with market levels but increases are implementing very slowly. End of year bonuses for 2010 were paid in January 2011 for double the Cravath level.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k,</p>
<p>$150k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$200k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Morrison &amp; Foerster has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. The firm follows market levels for bonuses, with more being awarded to those who bill a high number of hours and perform well. Bonuses ranged from $7,500 to $65,000 in 2010. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,950 hours warrants a standard bonus; 1,500 hours, a special bonus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson uses a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. First year associates received a flat $5,000 bonus in 2009 with rates matching market levels for following class years.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including billable hours, quality of work, and other factors.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Nixon Peabody LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Nixon Peabody uses a hybrid lockstep system that starts at $145,000. Raises are dependent on performance. Bonus worth 30% of salary is possible.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">O&#8217;Melveny &amp; Myers LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">O&#8217;Melveny has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels and not every associate receives a bonus. Spring 2011 bonuses were on the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k,</p>
<p>$280k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. 1,950 hours is the minimum to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe uses a talent model to determine compensation, with different amounts for associates, managing associates, and senior associates. Advancement is dependent on merit only. 2009 bonuses ranged from $5,000 to $75,000. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. There is no minimum billable hours requirement, though pro bono work factors in.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Patterson Belknap Webb &amp; Tyler LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Patterson Belknap Webb &amp; Tyler has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses follow market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and class year determine bonuses. Special bonuses given to those that log more than 2,100 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Patton Boggs LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Patton Boggs uses a hybrid lockstep system to determine salaries with three tiers separated by billable hours: 1,650, 1,800 and 1,950. Bonuses are paid in March and fall behind or meet market levels depending on several factors.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. Two options are available: 1. Based on billable hours above minimum 2. Based on hours, pro bono, work quality, etc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &amp; Walker LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &amp; Walker use a lockstep system to determine salaries. Bonuses match market levels and are paid out in March. 2010 bonuses matched Cravath scale for top-tier associates. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath level for all associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$230k,</p>
<p>$250k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. Minimum 1,950 hours to qualify.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &amp; Garrison uses a lockstep system to determine starting salaries. Bonuses are paid in December and match market levels.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$37k,</p>
<p>$42k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Perkins Coie LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Perkins Cole uses a lockstep system to determine starting salaries ranging from $120,000 to $160,000 depending on the office&#8217;s location. After that, merit plays a role in class year salary. Bonuses include equity in an investment plan.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$120k,</p>
<p>$120k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including productivity.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw &amp; Pittman has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $155,000 with raises made each year depending on if associates met a minimum number of billable hours. 2010 bonuses matched the market level at $15,000 for qualifying associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$155k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including productivity. Minimum billable hours required is 1,950.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Proskauer Rose LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Proskauer Rose has a lockstep system that start at $110,000 to $160,000 depending on the location of the office. Bonuses follow the market scale, with 2010 bonuses falling in line with the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonus amount.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan falls behind the market scale for salaries. Bonuses were awarded in 2010 at 150% of the Cravath scale plus $5,000 per additional 200 hours past the base level. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the Cravath scale for those billing 2,000 hours and beat it for those billing above 2,100.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$11k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$22k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$37k,</p>
<p>$45k,</p>
<p>$52k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and billable hours determines bonus amount with a 2,100 hour minimum.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Ropes &amp; Gray LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Ropes &amp; Gray has a lockstep system for determining base salaries. Bonuses match market levels at were at the Cravath level in 2009 and 2011.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. A minimum of 1,900 hours is required.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Schulte Roth &amp; Zabel LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Schulte, Roth &amp; Zabel has a lockstep system with salaries starting at $160,000. Bonuses match the market levels. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> $160k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class and billable hours year determines bonus amount with a 2,000-hour minimum.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Shearman &amp; Sterling LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Shearman &amp; Sterling have a lockstep salary system. Bonuses match the market level, though deviated slightly in 2010 when merit-based determinations were put in place. Spring 2011 bonuses matched the top of the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$7k,</p>
<p>$10k,</p>
<p>$15k,</p>
<p>$20k,</p>
<p>$25k,</p>
<p>$30k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year, billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sidley Austin LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Sidley Austin has a lockstep system to determine salaries and advancement. 2010 and 2011 bonuses met or exceeded the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process isn&#8217;t transparent. Minimum 2,000 hours are needed for full market-rate bonus</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett has a lockstep system to determine salaries, which are at the top of the market. Bonuses met the Cravath scale in 2009 and 2010. Spring 2011 bonuses also matched the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, &amp; Flom have a lockstep system for determining salaries. Bonuses meet market level in 2010 and were paid in December. Spring 2011 bonuses also met the market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year and billable hours determine bonus amounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SNR Denton</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">SNR Denton uses a lockstep salary system that starts at $160,000 with 12-15% of that paid out as a base bonus in the next year. After the first year, a three-tier system allows for raises based on merit.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$150k,</p>
<p>$155k,</p>
<p>$157k,</p>
<p>$160k,</p>
<p>$165k,</p>
<p>$179k,</p>
<p>$205k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey uses a merit-based system to determine salaries, which start at $117,000 and vary depending on class and performance.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$117k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Steptoe &amp; Johnson LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Steptoe &amp; Johnson use a lockstep system with some variable aspects, which start at $165,000. Bonuses falls below the market, though a supplemental bonus system does award additional money to those who bring new business to the firm.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Stroock &amp; Stroock &amp; Lavan uses a lockstep scale and pays at market rates. 2009 bonuses met the Cravath scale for those who met the billable hour minimum.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year, billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. 1,900 hours is the minimum requirement.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell uses a lockstep system to determine salaries. Compensation is typically ahead of the market, though it has matched it in 2009 and 2010. 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale in December for years 1-6 and gave even more than that to years 7-8. Special bonuses are also occasionally awarded in the spring. In 2009 they ranged from $500 to $8,500.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$37k,</p>
<p>$42k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Venable LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Salaries at Venable vary depending on class and merit, but they start at $145,000. Bonuses fall below the market.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$145k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vinson &amp; Elkins L.L.P.</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Vinson &amp; Elkins uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000 for first years. A lockstep bonus is also given to first years, but all years after that provide higher bonus amounts depending on billable hours. 2010 bonuses were above the Cravath scale, though spring 2011 bonuses fell below it.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$170k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses. For senior associates, bonus levels are higher at 1,950, 2,150, and 2,300 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $165,000. Bonuses are a percentage of an associate&#8217;s base salary.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Bonuses are determined by salary percentage.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses meet the Cravath scale. As of 2011, the firm no longer pays a special bonus to particularly high performing members.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">White &amp; Case LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">White &amp; Case uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, though payment varies from office to office. Bonuses meet market levels and are paid out in January. Spring 2011 bonuses were paid out in April and were highly variable.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including pro bono, contribution, and quality of work. The process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Williams &amp; Connolly LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Williams &amp; Connolly uses at lockstep system to determine salaries, which start at $180,00 for first year associates. Bonuses are not awarded and are built into the base salary, instead.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$180k,</p>
<p>$190k,</p>
<p>$230k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">No bonuses are awarded.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher uses a lockstep system to determine salaries in its U.S.-based offices. Bonuses are paid out in December each year to all associates at market levels. 2009, 2010, and spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126">$35k,</p>
<p>$35k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Class year determines bonuses.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">WilmerHale</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Starting salaries at WilmerHale are $165,000 though the firm is moving to a merit-based structure in 2012, at which time a higher percentage of salary will be paid out in bonuses determined by performance, quality of work, pro bono work, and other factors. Spring 2011 bonuses met the Cravath scale.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$165k,</p>
<p>$210k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati use a hybrid lockstep and merit-based system to determine salaries, which start at $160,000. Bonuses are at the market level, with a few associates getting higher than that. Bonuses ranged from a max of $9,000 for first years to $49,000 for senior associates.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88">$160k,</p>
<p>$170k,</p>
<p>$185k,</p>
<p>$210k,</p>
<p>$230k,</p>
<p>$250k,</p>
<p>$265k</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"> N/A</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, though the process is not transparent. Bonuses levels cap at 1,900, 2,100, and 2,400 hours.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="121"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Winston &amp; Strawn LLP</span></strong><strong></strong></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="162">Winston &amp; Strawn uses a lockstep system to determine salaries, which meet the market levels. 2009 and 2010 bonuses met the Cravath scale. 2011 spring bonuses were not awarded.</td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="88"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="126"></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid #000000;" width="138">Billable hours and subjective conditions determine bonuses, including pro bono, quality of work, contribution and other factors. The process is not transparent. Over 2,200 hours nets an additional bonus.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This <a title="LawCrossing Survey" href="http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/7349/LawCrossing-Survey-of-Lawyer-Salaries-in-Best-Law-Firms/" target="_blank">LawCrossing attorney salary survey</a> was first published on <a title="LawCrossing" href="http://www.lawcrossing.com/" target="_blank">LawCrossing.com</a>. If you would like to provide updates to this information, feel free to provide them anonymously by commenting below.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/30/law-firm-of-akin-gump-has-second-defamation-lawsuit-filed-against-it/" title="Law Firm of Akin Gump Has Second Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against It">Law Firm of Akin Gump Has Second Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against It</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/05/allen-overy-announces-launch-of-office-in-istanbul/" title="Allen &amp; Overy Announces Launch of Office In Istanbul">Allen &amp; Overy Announces Launch of Office In Istanbul</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/02/baker-mckenzie-announces-appointment-of-new-chief-operating-officer-to-australia-offices/" title="Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices">Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/02/allen-overy-expands-australian-practice/" title="Allen &amp; Overy Expands Australian Practice">Allen &amp; Overy Expands Australian Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebneely</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Hoon Choi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea U.S. free trade agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korean legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Leddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seoul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yong Guk Lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=31924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading international law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton LLP announced today its plans to open an office in Seoul, Korea during the first half of 2012. The firm’s announcement comes after the recent ratification of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement by both countries; this resulted in the opening in 2012 of the Korean legal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4023" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a></p>
<p>Leading international law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP announced today its plans to open an office in Seoul, Korea during the first half of 2012.</p>
<p>The firm’s announcement comes after the recent ratification of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement by both countries; this resulted in the opening in 2012 of the Korean legal services market to U.S.-based law firms.</p>
<p>Partner Yong Guk Lee and counsel Jay Hoon Choi, both currently based in Hong Kong, will relocate to Seoul.</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb managing partner Mark Leddy was quoted as saying in a press release at the firm’s website: “Our plan to open an office in Korea as soon as we are able reflects our 30 year commitment to Asia. During that period, our Korea practice has become the leading international practice covering Korea. Having Cleary Gottlieb lawyers in Seoul will allow us to serve both our Korea-based clients as well as clients outside the region doing business there more efficiently and effectively.”</p>
<p>As well, several associates fluent in Korean from the firm’s Korea practice will relocate to Seoul. In addition, the firm also plans to relocate other members of the Korea practice team to Seoul over a period of time. Cleary Gottlieb attorneys in Seoul will continue to be fully integrated with the firm’s larger Asia practice.</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb has had a robust Korea practice for over twenty years. With over 30 lawyers worldwide fluent in Korean &#8211; this includes four partners, two counsel, one senior attorney and ten associates based in Hong Kong &#8211; the firm possesses a team of uniquely talented, native Korean-speaking lawyers.</p>
<p>In addition, the firm has a broad network of relationships with leading Korean law firms with whom it works hand in hand to ensure that clients receive exceptional Korean law advice.</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb opened offices in Hong Kong in 1980 and in Beijing in 2006. The firm has operated continuously in Asia through times of extraordinary changes in the economies of many Asian countries. The firm has developed a thorough understanding of the region and an unmatched ability to work for clients based in Asia and for those based outside of Asia doing business there. Currently, the firm has more than fifty lawyers resident in Asia serving the needs of those clients.</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb has significant experience in a broad range of public and private sector transactions, as well as litigation, arbitration and enforcement matters, involving Korea. The firm assists Korean clients with their capital raising, overseas investment and other activities and assists non-Korean clients in direct investment in Korea. These transactions often require advice with respect to a range of issues, including finance, corporate governance, tax and disclosure of information. As well, the firm has broad experience and has enjoyed great success in litigating and arbitrating important disputes on behalf of Korean clients and in matters involving Korea. The firm also handles sensitive criminal and regulatory matters, including conducting internal investigations, for Korean clients and for companies facing such issues in Korea.</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP was founded in 1946, and has over 1,100 attorneys worldwide.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/11/31648/" title="Proskauer Opens Office in Beijing; Effort Underway Since 2008">Proskauer Opens Office in Beijing; Effort Underway Since 2008</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/15/merger-of-king-wood-and-mallesons-stephens-jaques-creates-largest-law-firm-in-asia/" title="Merger of King &amp; Wood and Mallesons Stephens Jaques Creates Largest Law Firm in Asia">Merger of King &amp; Wood and Mallesons Stephens Jaques Creates Largest Law Firm in Asia</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/02/baker-mckenzie-announces-appointment-of-new-chief-operating-officer-to-australia-offices/" title="Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices">Baker &amp; McKenzie Announces Appointment of New Chief Operating Officer to Australia Offices</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/01/dla-piper-adds-pair-of-attorneys-to-beijing-office/" title="DLA Piper Adds Pair of Attorneys to Beijing Office">DLA Piper Adds Pair of Attorneys to Beijing Office</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/sullivan-cromwell-launches-law-practice-in-hong-kong/" title="Sullivan &amp; Cromwell Launches Law Practice in Hong Kong">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell Launches Law Practice in Hong Kong</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Will Use Sullivan &amp; Cromwell in $39 Billion Purchase of T-Mobile USA</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/22/att-will-use-sullivan-and-wachtell-in-39-billion-purchase-of-t-mobile-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/22/att-will-use-sullivan-and-wachtell-in-39-billion-purchase-of-t-mobile-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aostler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold & Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowell & Moring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deutsche telekom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers & acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sullivan & Cromwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachtell Lipton Rosen Katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiley Rein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=29306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T has plans to buy T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom for $39 billion.  The lead firms that are going to be representing AT&#38;T and Deutsche Telekom are Sullivan &#38; Cromwell and Wachtell Lipton Rosen &#38; Katz. Sullivan and Cromwell is using a team led by New York partner Joseph Frumkin and LA partner Eric Krautheimer, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att_hz_4cp_grd_wht-160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-29307" title="att_hz_4cp_grd_wht-160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/att_hz_4cp_grd_wht-160x120.jpg" alt="AT&amp;T Logo" width="160" height="120" /></a></p>
<p><a title="AT&amp;T" href="http://www.att.com/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a> has plans to buy <a title="T-Mobile" href="http://www.t-mobile.com/" target="_blank">T-Mobile USA</a> from <a title="Deutsche Telekom" href="http://www.telekom.com/dtag/cms/content/dt/en/6908" target="_blank">Deutsche Telekom</a> for $39 billion.  The lead firms that are going to be representing AT&amp;T and Deutsche Telekom are <a title="Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP" href="http://www.sullcrom.com/" target="_blank">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell</a> and <a title="Wachtell Lipton Rosen &amp; Katz" href="http://www.wlrk.com/" target="_blank">Wachtell Lipton Rosen &amp; Katz</a>.</p>
<p>Sullivan and Cromwell is using a team led by New York partner Joseph Frumkin and LA partner Eric Krautheimer, which is giving advice to AT&amp;T on the deal.  LA partner Hydee Feldstein is giving advice to the company on financing, while Frankfurt corporate partner Wolfgang Feuring is in charge of any German law matters.  Two other partners from New York are also part of the team.  These two partners are Andrew Mason, tax partner, and benefits/executive compensation partner, Matthew Friestedt.  Regulatory advice is also being given to AT&amp;T by <a title="Crowell &amp; Moring" href="http://www.crowell.com/" target="_blank">Crowell &amp; Moring</a> and <a title="Arnold &amp; Porter LLP" href="http://www.arnoldporter.com/" target="_blank">Arnold &amp; Porter</a>.</p>
<p>Wachtell Lipton Rosen &amp; Katz is representing Deutsche Telekom in the deal.  The firm is being led by corporate partners Steven Cohen and Adam Emmerich.  Two other firms, <a title="Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton" href="http://www.cgsh.com/splash.aspx" target="_blank">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a> and <a title="Wiley Rein" href="http://www.wileyrein.com/" target="_blank">Wiley Rein</a> are also giving advice to Deutsche Telekom.</p>
<p>An equity stake in AT&amp;T will be given to Deutsche Telekom as part of the deal, and a representative from Deutsche Telekom will join AT&amp;T’s board of directors.</p>
<p>Although AT&amp;T and T-Mobile have approved the deal in both of their company boards, if this goes through, it will create the biggest cellular carrier in the United   States.  Combining T-Mobile USA’s 34 million subscribers with AT&amp;T’s 95.5 million will push them above <a title="Verizon Wireless" href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/index.html" target="_blank">Verizon’s</a> 94.1 million subscribers.</p>
<p>According to the Wall Street Journal, this deal is likely going to be of “particular concern to antitrust enforcers because the industry’s two dominant companies – Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Vodafone Group PLC and Verizon Communications, and AT&amp;T – are already so far ahead of anyone else, raising the specter of an effective duopoly in mobile telephony.”</p>
<p>According to the companies, this deal will provide both parties with “an optimal combination of network assets to add capacity sooner than any alternative, and it provides an opportunity to improve network quality in the near term for both companies’ customers.  In addition, it provides a fast, efficient and certain solution to the impending exhaustion of wireless spectrum in some markets…”</p>
<p>In “approximately 12 months” the deal is expected to close, according to a statement from AT&amp;T.  If the deal does not end up going through, AT&amp;T will pay a $3 billion breakup fee.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/" title="Report: Women Still Not Making Partner">Report: Women Still Not Making Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/09/20/7-states-join-doj-lawsuit-against-att-t-mobile-merger/" title="7 States Join DOJ Lawsuit Against AT&#038;T &#8211; T-Mobile Merger">7 States Join DOJ Lawsuit Against AT&#038;T &#8211; T-Mobile Merger</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/09/02/antitrust-suit-filed-by-doj-against-t-mobile-usa-att-deal/" title="Antitrust Suit Filed By DOJ Against T-Mobile USA-AT&#038;T Deal">Antitrust Suit Filed By DOJ Against T-Mobile USA-AT&#038;T Deal</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/29/gsi-commerce-being-purchased-by-ebay-for-2-4-billion/" title="GSI Commerce Being Purchased by eBay for $2.4 Billion">GSI Commerce Being Purchased by eBay for $2.4 Billion</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/" title="Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates">Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/22/att-will-use-sullivan-and-wachtell-in-39-billion-purchase-of-t-mobile-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marvins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cravath Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full-time associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal industry trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part-time associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpson Thacher & Bartlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special spring bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sullivan & Cromwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year-end associate bonuses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After setting the financial benchmark for year-end bonuses in late November, Cravath, Swaine &#38; Moore  confirmed that the firm will also provide special spring bonus to all of its associates. Cravath is the fourth AM LAW 100 firm to join the latest industry trend.  Sullivan &#38; Cromwell, Simpson Thacher &#38; Bartlett, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After setting the financial benchmark for year-end bonuses in late November, Cravath, Swaine &amp; <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cravath.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-18470" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cravath.gif" alt="" width="120" height="60" /></a> Moore  confirmed that the firm will also provide special spring bonus to all of its associates. Cravath is the fourth AM LAW 100 firm to join the latest industry trend.  Sullivan &amp; Cromwell, Simpson Thacher &amp; Bartlett, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton have also announced that special bonuses, ranging from $2,500 to $20,000, will be issued to their associates.</p>
<p>However, Cravath has set the bar higher as it revealed that its special bonuses would be significantly higher than the bonuses provided by the other firms announcing spring bonuses. For instance, Cravath’s payments to fourth-year associates are $15,000, an amount that is $5,000 higher than the extra payments to fifth years at the other three firms. Fifth through seventh year associastes at Cravath  will receive payments of $20,000 as compared to the other three firms which announced that their fifth, sixth, and seventh-year associates would receive $12,500, $15,000 and $17,500, respectively.  Payments for part-time lawyers will be on a pro-rated basis.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/" title="Report: Women Still Not Making Partner">Report: Women Still Not Making Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/debevoise-reports-revenue-up/" title="Debevoise Reports Revenue Up">Debevoise Reports Revenue Up</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/22/att-will-use-sullivan-and-wachtell-in-39-billion-purchase-of-t-mobile-usa/" title="AT&#038;T Will Use Sullivan &#038; Cromwell in $39 Billion Purchase of T-Mobile USA">AT&#038;T Will Use Sullivan &#038; Cromwell in $39 Billion Purchase of T-Mobile USA</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/01/19/dewey-announces-7-new-partners/" title="Dewey Announces 7 New Partners ">Dewey Announces 7 New Partners </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/01/14/lawyers-on-part-time-schedule-climb/" title="Lawyers on Part-time Schedule Climb">Lawyers on Part-time Schedule Climb</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton Elects New Managing Partner</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/20/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-elects-new-managing-partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/20/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-elects-new-managing-partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marvins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Leddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new managing partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton LLP has elected a new managing partner to lead their firm. Cleary, a leading international law firm for the past 60 years, elected Mark Leddy, an antitrust partner based in Washington DC, to replace Mark Walker in the managing partner post beginning in January 2011. Walker has been the managing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4023" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a> Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP has elected a new managing partner to lead their firm. Cleary, a leading international law firm for the past 60 years, elected Mark Leddy, an antitrust partner based in Washington DC, to replace Mark Walker in the managing partner post beginning in January 2011. Walker has been the managing partner since 2005. Under Walker’s term, the firm has successfully expanded in Asia, acquired an office in Beijing, launched a Hong Kong practice and is now preparing to enter the Brazilian market.</p>
<p>Leddy, who joined the firm as a partner in 1986 after 14 years in the US Department of Justice, said that he is committed to carrying on the outstanding work done by Walker. “I will continue Mark Walker&#8217;s strategy of thoughtful expansion, while at the same time maintaining our one-firm structure and our strong tradition of legal excellence, innovation and internationalism.&#8221; Leddy also expressed his admiration for the outgoing managing partner. &#8220;By any measure, Mark Walker has been an outstanding managing partner and leader. Mr. Walker has significantly enhanced our litigation strength in the United States and Europe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Walker is in full support of the incoming managing partner. “Mr. Leddy impressed me with not only his abilities as a lawyer but also his strengths as a thoughtful leader.”</p>
<p>Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP has about 1,100 lawyers spread across 12 offices. In 2009, the firm registered $965 gross revenue, a 27% increase from its 2008 revenue.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/05/02/29563/" title="Archer &amp; Greiner Merges with Herten Burstein, Forming NJ&#8217;s 4th Largest Law Firm">Archer &amp; Greiner Merges with Herten Burstein, Forming NJ&#8217;s 4th Largest Law Firm</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/23/boies-schiller-leads-the-bonus-race/" title="Boies Schiller Leads the Bonus Race">Boies Schiller Leads the Bonus Race</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/20/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-elects-new-managing-partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleary to Launch a Hong Kong Law Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/03/cleary-to-launch-a-hong-kong-law-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/03/cleary-to-launch-a-hong-kong-law-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marvins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asia practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeman chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong law practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norton Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK based firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK-based law firm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton revealed its plan to launch a Hong Kong law practice with a partner recruited out of Norton Rose, a UK based law firm.   Cleary, like several other US firms before it, is responding to a rapidly growing legal market in Hong Kong, driven by Hong Kong IPO&#8217;s.  Freeman Chan, who is leaving Norton [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4023" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a> Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton revealed its plan to launch a Hong Kong law practice with a partner recruited out of Norton Rose, a UK based law firm.   Cleary, like several other US firms before it, is responding to a rapidly growing legal market in Hong Kong, driven by Hong Kong IPO&#8217;s.  Freeman Chan, who is leaving Norton Rose to head up Cleary&#8217;s Hong Kong practice, is a member of The Takeovers Appeal Committee of the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.</p>
<p>Cleary managing partner Mark Walker explained that the plan is a vital step given the present market condition. “Adding Hong Kong law capability to our existing, successful Asia practice is a natural and important extension of our firm’s global business model, which combines strong local law and international law practices around the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>l</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/20/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-elects-new-managing-partner/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton Elects New Managing Partner">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton Elects New Managing Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/06/skadden-tops-the-world-in-ma-advisements/" title="Skadden Tops The World in M&amp;A Advisements">Skadden Tops The World in M&amp;A Advisements</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/03/cleary-to-launch-a-hong-kong-law-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am Law 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America Movil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brinks hofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross border financings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danielle anne phillip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edward g. quinlisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francisco Cestero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodwin Procter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heidi dare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jay reiziss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenner & Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Giraldez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kip Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m&a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic circle law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monday News Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morning news roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palo Alto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela J. Martinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regina pisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott brim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidley Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidley Austin LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom DeFilipps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 250 list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulmer &]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulmer & Berne LLP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good morning everyone! Today is Monday, November 22nd. Here&#8217;s a quick look back at Friday&#8217;s news. Brinks Hofer Gilson &#38; Lione, one of the largest intellectual property law firms in the U.S., promoted four attorneys to shareholder&#8230; Ulmer &#38; Berne LLP was recognized for strategic growth&#8230; McDonald Hopkins added a lateral from Jenner Block&#8230; Goodwin Procter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/jdjournal_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1385" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/jdjournal_160x120.jpg" alt="JD Journal" width="160" height="120" /></a>Good morning everyone! Today is Monday, November 22nd. Here&#8217;s a quick look back at Friday&#8217;s news.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/brinks-hofer-promotes-four-to-shareholder/">Brinks Hofer Gilson &amp; Lione, one of the largest intellectual property law firms in the U.S., promoted four attorneys to shareholder</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/ulmer-berne-llp-recognized-for-strategic-growth/">Ulmer &amp; Berne LLP was recognized for strategic growth</a>&#8230;</p>
<div><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/mcdonald-hopkins-adds-lateral-from-jenner-block/">McDonald Hopkins added a lateral from Jenner Block</a>&#8230;</div>
<div><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/goodwin-procter-chairman-receives-access-first-one-award/">Goodwin Procter Chairman Regina Pisa received the ACCESS First One Award</a>&#8230;</div>
<div><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/">Cleary Gottlieb announced plans to open an office in Brazil</a>&#8230;</div>
<div><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/sidley-austin-hires-partner-in-palo-alto-office/">Sidley Austin added a partner in its Palo Alto office</a>&#8230;</div>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/sidley-austin-hires-partner-in-palo-alto-office/" title="Sidley Austin Adds Partner in Palo Alto Office">Sidley Austin Adds Partner in Palo Alto Office</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/brinks-hofer-promotes-four-to-shareholder/" title="Brinks Hofer Promotes Four to Shareholder">Brinks Hofer Promotes Four to Shareholder</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/ulmer-berne-llp-recognized-for-strategic-growth/" title="Ulmer &#038; Berne LLP Recognized for Strategic Growth">Ulmer &#038; Berne LLP Recognized for Strategic Growth</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/30/morning-roundup-172/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am Law 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America Movil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazilian authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross border financings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francisco Cestero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Giraldez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latin america practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading international law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m&a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic circle law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Paulo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=28046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton announced its plans to open an office in Sao Paulo, Brazil in 2011, subject to approval of Brazilian authorities. Cleary managing partner Mark Walker said in a statement from the firm: &#8220;Brazil is a significant part of our Latin America practice, which began over 50 years ago and includes more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4023" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/clearygottleib_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a><a href="http://www.cgsh.com/about/overview/">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a> announced its plans to open an office in Sao Paulo, Brazil in 2011, subject to approval of Brazilian authorities.</p>
<p>Cleary managing partner Mark Walker said in a statement from the firm: &#8220;Brazil is a significant part of our Latin America practice, which began over 50 years ago and includes more than 100 lawyers.”</p>
<p>New York partner Juan Giráldez and Rome partner Francisco Cestero will manage the Brazil office. Both will relocate to São Paulo. Giráldez focuses on international financing and business transactions, in particular capital markets transactions, M&amp;A, cross-border financings, joint ventures and privatizations. Cestero has assisted América Móvil, the largest wireless operator in Latin America, in over 10 international acquisitions and joint ventures.</p>
<p>Cleary plans to staff the São Paul office with around 10 lawyers who will focus on capital markets, project finance and restructuring, cross-border mergers and acquisitions, regulatory issues, corporate governance, and litigation.</p>
<p>Cleary&#8217;s planned move into the market is the latest in a string of Brazil entries over the past two years by Am Law 100 and Magic Circle law firms, includeing Skadden, DLA Piper and Chadbourne &amp; Parke. The market is appealing to firms with strong cross-border capital markets and infrastructure practices.</p>
<p>A leading international law firm with 12 offices located in major financial centers around the world, Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP has helped shape the globalization of the legal profession for more than 60 years. Organized and operated as a single, integrated global partnership, Cleary Gottlieb employs approximately 1,100 lawyers.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/20/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-elects-new-managing-partner/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton Elects New Managing Partner">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton Elects New Managing Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/03/cleary-to-launch-a-hong-kong-law-practice/" title="Cleary to Launch a Hong Kong Law Practice">Cleary to Launch a Hong Kong Law Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/05/03/squire-sanders-dempsey-expands-global-finance-capability-in-ny-office/" title="Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey Expands Global Finance Capability in NY Office">Squire, Sanders &amp; Dempsey Expands Global Finance Capability in NY Office</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skadden Tops The World in M&amp;A Advisements</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/06/skadden-tops-the-world-in-ma-advisements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/06/skadden-tops-the-world-in-ma-advisements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jones Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m&a advisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skadden’s market shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top spot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=24626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thompson Reuters&#8217; quarterly study of worldwide mergers and acquisitions shows Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &#38; Flom had the best first half of the year advising on 82 deals worth $137 billion. Skadden secured top deals in telecoms and media to regain the top spot it held at the end of 2009. However, Skadden&#8217;s market share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/skadden_160x120.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-801" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/skadden_160x120.gif" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Thompson Reuters&#8217; quarterly study of worldwide mergers and acquisitions shows <a href="http://www.skadden.com">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom</a> had the best first half of the year advising on 82 deals worth $137 billion.</p>
<p>Skadden secured top deals in telecoms and media to regain the top spot it held at the end of 2009. However, Skadden&#8217;s market share did decrease by more than 8 percentage points to 12.8 percent since the first half of 2009.</p>
<p>Among Skadden&#8217;s deals was the second-largest of the six-month period, U.S. phone operator CenturyLink&#8217;s $22 billion acquisition of Quest Communications International Inc., according to a Reuters press release.</p>
<p>Skadden is also representing News Corp&#8217;s proposed $13.7 billion bid for British satellite broadcaster BSkyB.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cgsh.com">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton </a>jumped to 2nd from 17th place for the first half of the year after advising on 57 deals worth $111 billion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jonesday.com">Jones Day</a> had the heaviest volume with 175 transactions worth $50.8 billion.</p>
<p>The number of global deals rose 3.8 percent from the first half of last year, while their value jumped 9.4 percent, taking the total to $1.1 trillion &#8212; the strongest opening six month period for global deals since 2008.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/07/morning-roundup-147/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/03/jones-day-adds-three-attorneys-to-new-york-boston-offices/" title="Jones Day Adds Three Attorneys to New York, Boston Offices">Jones Day Adds Three Attorneys to New York, Boston Offices</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/30/summer-hires-could-be-increasing/" title="Firms Looking to Increase Summer Hires">Firms Looking to Increase Summer Hires</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/28/former-linklaters-managing-partner-tony-angel-to-join-dla-piper-as-co-global-chairman/" title="Former Linklaters Managing Partner Tony Angel to Join DLA Piper as Co-Global Chairman?">Former Linklaters Managing Partner Tony Angel to Join DLA Piper as Co-Global Chairman?</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/06/skadden-tops-the-world-in-ma-advisements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Administration Names Federal Judge Nominees</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/11/the-obama-administration-names-federal-judge-nominees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/11/the-obama-administration-names-federal-judge-nominees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Western]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jones Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kathleen o’malley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porter Wright Morris Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Lohier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Court of Appeals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=21134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judge Kathleen O’Malley and Raymond Lohier Jr. have been nominated by President Barack Obama for federal appellate judgeships. O’Malley has been nominated for the Federal Circuit. She has been a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio since 1994. She also teaches patent litigation at Case Western Reserve University School [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/doj2_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2798" title="doj2_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/doj2_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>Judge Kathleen O’Malley and Raymond Lohier Jr. have been <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/03/white-house-rolls-out-two-more-circuit-nominees.html">nominated</a> by President Barack Obama for federal appellate judgeships.</p>
<p>O’Malley has been nominated for the Federal Circuit. She has been a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio since 1994. She also teaches patent litigation at <a href="http://law.case.edu/Default.aspx">Case Western Reserve University School of Law</a>, where she received her law degree. O’Malley has served as the first assistant attorney general and chief of staff to the Ohio attorney general. She was chief counsel to Ohio Attorney General Lee Fischer from 1991 to 1992. She is a former associate at <a href="http://www.jonesday.com/">Jones Day</a> and made partner at <a href="http://www.porterwright.com/home/default.asp">Porter Wright Morris &amp; Arthur</a> during her tenure from 1985 to 1991.</p>
<p>Raymond Lohier Jr. has been nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. Lohier received his law degree from <a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/index.htm">New York University</a> and he currently serves as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York and heads the office’s Securities and Commodities Task Force. From 1997 to 2000 Lohier was a senior trial attorney in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. He was also an associate at <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/splash.aspx">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a> from 1993 to 1997.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/24/president-obama-addresses-nation-tonight/" title="President Obama Addresses Nation Tonight">President Obama Addresses Nation Tonight</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/08/06/kagans-big-weekend/" title="Kagan’s Big Weekend">Kagan’s Big Weekend</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/07/06/skadden-tops-the-world-in-ma-advisements/" title="Skadden Tops The World in M&amp;A Advisements">Skadden Tops The World in M&amp;A Advisements</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/04/21/obama-supreme-court-pick-coming-by-may-26/" title="Obama Supreme Court Pick Coming By May 26 ">Obama Supreme Court Pick Coming By May 26 </a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/17/birthers-beware-hawaii-looks-to-put-stop-to-obama-requests/" title="&#8220;Birthers&#8221; Beware; Hawaii Looks to Put Stop to Obama Requests">&#8220;Birthers&#8221; Beware; Hawaii Looks to Put Stop to Obama Requests</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/03/11/the-obama-administration-names-federal-judge-nominees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cravath Confirms: No Partners to be Named in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/12/23/cravath-confirms-no-partners-to-be-named-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/12/23/cravath-confirms-no-partners-to-be-named-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aine Ford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cravath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debevoise & Plimpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gotshal & manges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lipton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosen & Katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachtell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=18466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making partner at a big New York firm has been a possibility for only the shining stars of the legal profession. In this recession, however, the chances of becoming partner have quickly gone from bad to worse. At many prominent firms, the number of new partners has significantly dropped: four at Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cravath.gif"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-18470" title="cravath" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cravath.gif" alt="" width="120" height="60" /></a>Making partner at a big New York firm has been a possibility for only the shining stars of the legal profession.  In this recession, however, the chances of becoming partner have quickly gone from bad to worse.  At many prominent firms, the number of new partners has significantly dropped: four at Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton (six in 2008); two at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz (six in 2008); two at Debevoise &amp; Plimpton  (six in 2008); and three at Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges (seven in 2008).  Finally, and by far the most dismal of all: Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore has just announced that it will not be making any new partners this year.</p>
<p>While Cravath has always carried the reputation of being hard to break into partnership, there has yet to be a year where not one associate has made partner.  There have been rumors that the firm was hit harder than other firms during the economic crisis, as Cravath did suffer a 24 percent drop in its profits per partner for 2008.</p>
<p>Cravath&#8217;s deputy presiding partner, Allen Parker, denies that this decision has been influenced by the economic crisis, but rather attributes it to the fact that no one has met the firm&#8217;s standards.  There are reports that only a handfull of attorneys from the class of 2002 are left with the firm and that the superstars all got out several years ago.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/14/clifford-chance-partners-with-a-former-banker/" title="Clifford Chance Partners with a Former Banker">Clifford Chance Partners with a Former Banker</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/18/cravath-swains-forrest-leaves-firm-for-department-of-justice/" title="Cravath Swain&#8217;s Forrest Leaves Firm for Department of Justice">Cravath Swain&#8217;s Forrest Leaves Firm for Department of Justice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/09/morning-roundup-192/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/08/winston-strawn-llp-adds-two-partners-to-los-angeles-office/" title="Winston &amp; Strawn LLP Adds Two Partners to Los Angeles Office">Winston &amp; Strawn LLP Adds Two Partners to Los Angeles Office</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/09/02/columbus-office-of-dinsmore-shohl-to-add-two-new-partners/" title="Columbus Office of Dinsmore &amp; Shohl to Add Two New Partners">Columbus Office of Dinsmore &amp; Shohl to Add Two New Partners</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/12/23/cravath-confirms-no-partners-to-be-named-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo v Bank of America, Round 2</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/09/cuomo-v-bank-of-america-round-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/09/cuomo-v-bank-of-america-round-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew m. cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleary gottleib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york attorney general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=16827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began running for Governor errr trying his case in the media when he publicly called on Bank of America to waive attorney-client privilege so that he, AG Cuomo, could determine what crimes if any were committed. Well, it appears the game is afoot and Bank of America is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/08/attorney-client-priviledge-under-fire-on-the-east-coast/">Yesterday</a>, New York <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/27cuomo751.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/27cuomo75.jpg"></a>Attorney General Andrew Cuomo  began <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">running for Governor</span> errr trying his case in the media when he publicly called on Bank of America to waive attorney-client privilege so that he, AG Cuomo, could determine what crimes if any were committed.  Well, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bofa75x75.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-16778" title="bofa75x75" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bofa75x75.jpg" alt="" width="163" height="92" /></a>it appears the game is afoot and Bank of America is just as familiar with the court of public opinion.  Today, Lewis Liman from <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/splash.aspx">Cleary Gottleib</a>, BofA&#8217;s outside counsel, reminded Cuomo that the Bank has not invoked the privilege and that Cleary has asked to meet with Cuomo on several occasions to clear the matter up.  Both sides claim to want to have a heart to heart, but first they want to make sure everyone knows the other guy is stalling.  We&#8217;ll keep you posted as developments warrant.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/08/attorney-client-priviledge-under-fire-on-the-east-coast/" title="Attorney-Client Privilege Under Fire on the East Coast?">Attorney-Client Privilege Under Fire on the East Coast?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/12/03/cleary-to-launch-a-hong-kong-law-practice/" title="Cleary to Launch a Hong Kong Law Practice">Cleary to Launch a Hong Kong Law Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/19/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-sao-paulo-brazil-in-2011/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Sao Paulo</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/09/cuomo-v-bank-of-america-round-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-Client Privilege Under Fire on the East Coast?</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/08/attorney-client-priviledge-under-fire-on-the-east-coast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/08/attorney-client-priviledge-under-fire-on-the-east-coast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew m. cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client priviledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ri supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax accrual documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[textron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=16794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In two unrelated stories making headlines today, the ability of attorneys to give corporate clients unvarnished and frank advice is coming under fire. In New York, AG Cuomo is taking on outside counsel for Bank of America, saying in a letter to Lewis J. Liman of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &#38; Hamilton, &#8220;&#8230;attorney-client privilege is hindering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/gavel_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-524" title="gavel_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/gavel_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" /></a>In two unrelated stories making headlines today, the ability of attorneys to give corporate clients unvarnished and frank advice is coming under fire.</p>
<p>In New York, <a href="http://www.oag.state.ny.us/">AG Cuomo </a>is taking on outside counsel for Bank of America, saying in a letter to Lewis J. Liman of <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/splash.aspx">Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &amp; Hamilton</a>, &#8220;&#8230;attorney-client privilege is hindering this office’s ability to make <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/gavel_160x120.jpg"></a>fair and fully informed decisions as to what charges, if any, to bring and whether individual Bank of America officers should be charged.&#8221;</p>
<p>We also have news out of Rhode Island where the 1st Circuit in <em>U.S. v. Textron Inc.</em> has ruled that tax accrual documents do not fall under the work product protections, even if prepared with litigation in mind, because their principal purpose is accounting, not legal.  This creates a split between the circuits and makes the issue ripe for the Supreme Court.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/09/cuomo-v-bank-of-america-round-2/" title="Cuomo v Bank of America, Round 2">Cuomo v Bank of America, Round 2</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/13/orrick-herrington-sutcliffe-llp-adds-five-partners-to-ny-acquisition-finance-practice/" title="Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice">Orrick, Herrington &amp; Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/02/04/ny-ag-sues-bofa-wells-fargo-jpmorgan-chase-over-mortgage-fraud/" title="NY AG Sues BofA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase over Mortgage Fraud">NY AG Sues BofA, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase over Mortgage Fraud</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/09/mayor-of-lackawanna-appoints-father-in-law-as-city-attorney/" title="Mayor of Lackawanna Appoints Father-in-Law as City Attorney">Mayor of Lackawanna Appoints Father-in-Law as City Attorney</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/06/teen-girl-killed-by-bus-holding-suicide-note/" title="Teen Girl Killed by Bus Holding Suicide Note">Teen Girl Killed by Bus Holding Suicide Note</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/09/08/attorney-client-priviledge-under-fire-on-the-east-coast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yale Law Women Choose 2009 Top Ten &#8216;Family-Friendly&#8217; Firms</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/20/yale-law-women-choose-2009-top-ten-family-friendly-firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/20/yale-law-women-choose-2009-top-ten-family-friendly-firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold & Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covington & Burling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible hours scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenner & Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katten Muchin Rosenman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayer Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munger Tolles & Olson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patton Boggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidley Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale Law Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=16411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yale Law Women has announced its 2009 Top Ten Family Friendly Firms List: Arnold &#38; Porter Cleary Gottlieb Covington &#38; Burling Jenner &#38; Block Katten Muchin Rosenman Mayer Brown Munger, Tolles &#38; Olson Patton Boggs Sidley Austin WilmerHale From the press release: YLW believes that the discussion of family friendly firm policies remains salient in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-8412" title="yale_160x120" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/yale_160x120.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="120" />Yale Law Women has announced its 2009 Top Ten Family Friendly Firms List:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/arnold-porter/" target="_self">Arnold &amp; Porter</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/covington-burling/" target="_self">Covington &amp; Burling</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/jenner-block/" target="_self">Jenner &amp; Block</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/katten-muchin-rosenman/" target="_self">Katten Muchin Rosenman</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/mayer-brown/" target="_self">Mayer Brown</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/munger-tolles-olson/" target="_self">Munger, Tolles &amp; Olson</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/patton-boggs/" target="_self">Patton Boggs</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/sidley-austin/" target="_self">Sidley Austin</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/wilmer-cutler-pickering-hale-dorr/" target="_self">WilmerHale</a></p>
<p>From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>YLW believes that the discussion of family friendly firm policies remains salient in the midst of the current recession&#8230; YLW hopes leading firms will use this period of transformation as an opportunity to develop more flexible work arrangements and career paths for their attorneys&#8230;</p>
<p>Twenty-five percent of firms who responded to our survey offer formal “off-ramp/on-ramp programs,” which allow attorneys to leave the firm for a number of years to pursue other types of legal practice or to take time off to spend with their families.</p>
<p>Flexible and part-time work options are also becoming the norm: 99% of part-time requests were granted on average, and 41% of responding firms automatically grant part-time requests if conditions in a written policy are met&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;YLW remains concerned about the dearth of women in leadership positions, the gender gap in those who take advantage of family friendly policies, and the possibility that working part-time can derail an otherwise successful career.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yale Law Women is a non-partisan organization that promotes the interests of women within the law school and beyond. To this end, YLW cultivates debate and discussion of issues pertaining to women and gender broadly defined; promotes speech and action by YLW members on issues of import to women; devotes resources to student support and professional development; recognizes and fosters outstanding achievement; and advocates in service of women&#8217;s interests in society.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/11/2009-best-law-firms-for-women-announced/" title="50 Best Law Firms for Women Announced">50 Best Law Firms for Women Announced</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/20/morning-roundup-211/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/10/20/biglaw-lends-a-hand-in-new-childrens-law-center-campaign/" title="BigLaw Lends A Hand in New Children&#8217;s Law Center Campaign">BigLaw Lends A Hand in New Children&#8217;s Law Center Campaign</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/11/22/morning-roundup-231/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/02/25/morning-roundup-76/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/20/yale-law-women-choose-2009-top-ten-family-friendly-firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lateral Hiring Up 100% in London</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/26/lateral-hiring-up-100-in-london/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/26/lateral-hiring-up-100-in-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold & Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cravath Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dechert LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lateral hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lateral partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laterals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firms hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shearman & Sterling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weil Gotshal & Manges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White & Case LLP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over five years, London firms’ hiring of lateral partners has almost doubled, from 42 hires in 2004 to 79 in 2008. The data come from a Legal Week study tracking hiring at 33 US and UK firms’ London offices. Orrick, Weil Gotshal, Arnold &#38; Porter, Cleary Gottlieb, Cravath, and Skadden all brought on laterals. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ukunitedkingdom_160x120.jpg" alt="UK Flag" />Over five years, London firms’ hiring of lateral partners has almost doubled, from 42 hires in 2004 to 79 in 2008.</p>
<p>The data come from a <em>Legal Week</em> study tracking hiring at 33 US and UK firms’ London offices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/orrick-herrington-sutcliffe/" target="_self">Orrick</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/weil-gotshal-manges/" target="_self">Weil Gotshal</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/arnold-porter/" target="_self">Arnold &amp; Porter</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cravath-swaine-moore/" target="_self">Cravath</a>, and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/skadden-arps-slate-meagher-flom/" target="_self">Skadden</a> all brought on laterals.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/shearman-sterling/" target="_self">Shearman &amp; Sterling</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/dechert-llp/" target="_self">Dechert</a> and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/white-case-llp/" target="_self">White &amp; Case</a> cut lawyers.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/20/survey-skadden-is-nations-top-firm-again/" title="Survey: Skadden is Nation&#8217;s Top Firm Again">Survey: Skadden is Nation&#8217;s Top Firm Again</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/debevoise-reports-revenue-up/" title="Debevoise Reports Revenue Up">Debevoise Reports Revenue Up</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/" title="Report: Women Still Not Making Partner">Report: Women Still Not Making Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/06/14/morning-roundup-118/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/11/amlaw-cadwalader-still-1-for-layoffs/" title="AmLaw: Cadwalader Still #1 for Layoffs">AmLaw: Cadwalader Still #1 for Layoffs</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/26/lateral-hiring-up-100-in-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debevoise Reports Revenue Up</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/debevoise-reports-revenue-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/debevoise-reports-revenue-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cravath Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davis Polk & Wardwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debevoise & Plimpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits per partner drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sullivan & Cromwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weil Gotshal & Manges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=7996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York&#8217;s Debevoise &#38; Plimpton announced that its 2008 gross revenue climbed 7.2%, while profits per partner fell nearly 3%. Revenue grew to $760.8 million, but profits per partner dropped to $2.23 million. The drop-off in profitability followed declines at other New York-based firms, such as Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &#38; Flom; Sullivan &#38; Cromwell; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/debevoise-plimpton/" target="_self">Debevoise &amp; Plimpton</a> announced that its 2008 gross revenue climbed 7.2%, while profits per partner fell nearly 3%.</p>
<p>Revenue grew to $760.8 million, but profits per partner dropped to $2.23 million.</p>
<p>The drop-off in profitability followed declines at other New York-based firms, such as <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/skadden-arps-slate-meagher-flom/" target="_self">Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom</a>; <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/sullivan-cromwell/" target="_self">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell</a>; and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/davis-polk-wardwell/" target="_self">Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell</a>. Only a few, such as <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a> and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/weil-gotshal-manges/" target="_self">Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges</a>, have posted positive results.</p>
<p>Debevoise&#8217;s profits per partner dropped in part because the firm had more equity partners in 2008. The firm&#8217;s overall income actually increased 1.3% last year to $318 million. But the number of equity partners also increased.</p>
<p>Revenue per lawyer inched up slightly by less than 1% to $1.2 million.</p>
<p>The firm cut associate bonuses in December, after <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cravath-swaine-moore/" target="_self">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore</a> set the market floor at $17,500 for a first-year associate bonus.</p>
<p>Debevoise &amp; Plimpton LLP is a prominent international law firm based in New York City. Founded in 1931 by Eli Whitney Debevoise and William Stevenson,  the firm currently employs about 680 lawyers in eight offices throughout the world.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/20/survey-skadden-is-nations-top-firm-again/" title="Survey: Skadden is Nation&#8217;s Top Firm Again">Survey: Skadden is Nation&#8217;s Top Firm Again</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/26/lateral-hiring-up-100-in-london/" title=" Lateral Hiring Up 100% in London"> Lateral Hiring Up 100% in London</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/03/29/gsi-commerce-being-purchased-by-ebay-for-2-4-billion/" title="GSI Commerce Being Purchased by eBay for $2.4 Billion">GSI Commerce Being Purchased by eBay for $2.4 Billion</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/" title="Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates">Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/06/14/morning-roundup-118/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/02/debevoise-reports-revenue-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Women Still Not Making Partner</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrews Kurth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arent Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baker & Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Cave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for WorkLife Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cravath Swaine & Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dechert LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickstein Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farella Braun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foley Hoag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hastings College of the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hogan & Hartson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holland and Hart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaye Scholer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King & Spalding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowenstein Sandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project for Attorney Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schulte Roth & Zabel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpson Thacher & Bartlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steptoe & Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sullivan & Cromwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venable LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachtell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White & Case LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiley Rein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkie Farr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=7381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report released by the San Francisco-based Project for Attorney Retention, which surveyed 100 American law firms, only 23 of those firms had partnership classes consisting of at least 40% women in 2008. Fourteen of the 100 firms did not include any women. The survey included 100 law firms, which were chosen based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a report released by the San Francisco-based Project for Attorney Retention, which surveyed 100 American law firms, only 23 of those firms had partnership classes consisting of at least 40% women in 2008.</p>
<p>Fourteen of the 100 firms did not include any women.</p>
<p>The survey included 100 law firms, which were chosen based on prior years’ surveys, firm size, reputation, and availability of information.</p>
<p>From the report:</p>
<blockquote><p>The best: <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cravath-swaine-moore/" target="_self"> Cravath</a> (67%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/dickstein-shapiro/" target="_self">Dickstein Shapiro</a> (67%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/wiley-rein/" target="_self">Wiley Rein</a> (60%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/andrews-kurth/" target="_self">Andrews Kurth</a> (57%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/bryan-cave/" target="_self">Bryan Cave</a> (56%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/arent-fox/" target="_self">Arent Fox</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/baker-daniels/" target="_self">Baker &amp; Daniels</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/hogan-hartson/" target="_self">Hogan &amp; Hartson</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/holland-and-hart/" target="_self">Holland and Hart</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/king-spalding/" target="_self">King &amp; Spalding</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/luce-forward-hamilton-scripps/" target="_self">Luce Forward</a> (50%), <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/simpson-thacher-bartlett/" target="_self">Simpson Thacher</a> (50%),  and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/sullivan-cromwell/" target="_self">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell</a> (50%).  A  special mention goes to <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/farella-braun/" target="_self">Farella Braun</a>, whose only new partner is female (100%).</p>
<p>The worst:  None of the following firms made a female partner this year: <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cadwalader-wickersham-taft/" target="_self"> Cadwalader</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/dechert-llp/" target="_self">Dechert</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/foley-hoag/" target="_self">Foley Hoag</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/kaye-scholer/" target="_self">Kaye Scholer</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/lowenstein-sandler/" target="_self">Lowenstein Sandler</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/milbank/" target="_self">Milbank</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/steptoe-johnson/" target="_self">Schulte Roth</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/steptoe-johnson/" target="_self">Steptoe</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/strook/" target="_self">Strook</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/venable-llp/" target="_self">Venable</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/wachtell/" target="_self">Wachtell</a>, <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/white-case-llp/" target="_self">White &amp; Case</a>, and <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/wilkie-farr/" target="_self">Wilkie Farr</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>PAR is an initiative of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/08/11/2009-best-law-firms-for-women-announced/" title="50 Best Law Firms for Women Announced">50 Best Law Firms for Women Announced</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/02/01/cravath-to-give-special-spring-bonus-to-its-associates/" title="Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates">Cravath to Give Special Spring Bonus to its Associates</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/26/lateral-hiring-up-100-in-london/" title=" Lateral Hiring Up 100% in London"> Lateral Hiring Up 100% in London</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/10/march-9th-worst-day-for-law-firm-layoffs-so-far/" title="March 9th Worst Day for Law Firm Layoffs So Far">March 9th Worst Day for Law Firm Layoffs So Far</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/12/reduced-hours-for-associates-instead-of-layoffs/" title="Reduced Hours for Associates Instead of Layoffs?">Reduced Hours for Associates Instead of Layoffs?</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/24/report-women-still-not-making-partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Still Hunting to Fill Legal Positions</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/08/sec-still-hunting-to-fill-legal-positions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/08/sec-still-hunting-to-fill-legal-positions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Levitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief legal officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Becker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisse Walter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linda Thomsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Schapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partners leaving the firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US SEC chairman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=6179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Securities and Exchange Chairman Mary Schapiro has named David Becker, a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton, as chief legal officer and senior policy adviser, one of her first appointments since taking office. Becker, 61, as general counsel will coordinate legal cases and advise on enforcement actions, and will have an additional role [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Securities and Exchange Chairman Mary Schapiro has named David Becker, a partner at <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a>, as chief legal officer and senior policy adviser, one of her first appointments since taking office.</p>
<p>Becker, 61, as general counsel will coordinate legal cases and advise on enforcement actions, and will have an additional role in developing and implementing SEC policies. He was SEC general counsel from 2000 to 2002.</p>
<p>Becker served as SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt’s chief lawyer and participated in policy and regulatory initiatives</p>
<p>Schapiro has asked Commissioner Elisse Walter, a Democrat, to seek candidates who may replace other senior managers at the agency, including Enforcement Director Linda Thomsen.</p>
<p>Schapiro earned a JD degree from George Washington University in 1980.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/17/cleary-gottlieb-did-well-in-2008/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Clearly Did Well in 2008">Cleary Gottlieb Clearly Did Well in 2008</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/" title="LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms">LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/28/cleary-gottlieb-announces-plans-to-open-office-in-seoul-korea/" title="Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea">Cleary Gottlieb Announces Plans to Open Office in Seoul, Korea</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/18/dla-piper-announces-launch-of-new-international-securities-group-along-with-new-partner/" title="DLA Piper Announces Launch of New International Securities Group, Along With New Partner">DLA Piper Announces Launch of New International Securities Group, Along With New Partner</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/10/31/former-nixon-peabody-partner-sues-firm-alleging-he-was-made-scapegoat-in-sec-investigation/" title="Former Nixon Peabody Partner Sues Firm, Alleging He Was Made Scapegoat in SEC Investigation">Former Nixon Peabody Partner Sues Firm, Alleging He Was Made Scapegoat in SEC Investigation</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/08/sec-still-hunting-to-fill-legal-positions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleary Gottlieb Clearly Did Well in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/17/cleary-gottlieb-did-well-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/17/cleary-gottlieb-did-well-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue per partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rise revenue and profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York-based international law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen &#38; Hamilton saw both revenue and profits per partner rise in 2008. Gross revenue rose 8% to $965 million, and profits per partner increased about 12% to $2.4 million. But revenue per lawyer was basically flat, down less than 1%. Nearly half the firm&#8217;s lawyers are overseas, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York-based international law firm <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/cleary-gottlieb-steen-hamilton/" target="_self">Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton</a> saw both revenue and profits per partner rise in 2008.</p>
<p>Gross revenue rose 8% to $965 million, and profits per partner increased about 12% to $2.4 million.</p>
<p>But revenue per lawyer was basically flat, down less than 1%.</p>
<p>Nearly half the firm&#8217;s lawyers are overseas, helping to cushion the blow from the dramatic slowdown in the United States</p>
<p>Cleary advised the SEC and Federal Reserve Bank of New York during the collapse of Lehman Brothers. It then advised Barclays in its acquisition of Lehman Brothers&#8217; North American investment banking and capital markets businesses.</p>
<p>The firm employs over 900 lawyers globally.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/01/28/patton-boggs%e2%80%99-profits-and-revenue-show-slight-increase/" title="Patton Boggs’ Profits and Revenue Show Slight Increase">Patton Boggs’ Profits and Revenue Show Slight Increase</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/08/sec-still-hunting-to-fill-legal-positions/" title="SEC Still Hunting to Fill Legal Positions">SEC Still Hunting to Fill Legal Positions</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/25/paul-weiss-enjoys-solid-2008/" title="Paul Weiss Enjoys Solid 2008">Paul Weiss Enjoys Solid 2008</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2008/12/19/paul-hastings-associate-charged-in-insider-trading-scheme/" title="Paul Hastings Associate Charged in Insider Trading Scheme">Paul Hastings Associate Charged in Insider Trading Scheme</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/28/lawcrossing-survey-of-lawyer-salaries-of-best-law-firms/" title="LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms">LawCrossing Survey of Lawyer Salaries of Best Law Firms</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/17/cleary-gottlieb-did-well-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

