By filing this lawsuit, Schneiderman has made it pretty clear where he stands on the deal that the Obama administration has proposed for the banks in their role in the foreclosure crisis. The deal is seen by some as being excessively soft towards the banks.

Schneiderman even went on record to pretty much call the proposed settlement the equivalent of giving a blanket plea deal to a criminal. States have till February 6 to decide if they want to join the settlement.

The fact that Schneiderman has filed this lawsuit is made even more interesting by the fact that he is one of the five co-chairs of a task force that President Obama announced to investigate fraud related to bonds backed by mortgage loans.

At the heart of the suit is the fact that these three banks used MERS – Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems. This system is used to register ownership of mortgage loans. Before the system was put in place, that work was done at the local courthouses, which many felt slowed down the entire mortgage process. But after its introduction in 1995, over 70 million mortgages have been handled by it.

But the system has problems. Schneiderman’s suit says its use resulted in many fraudulent foreclosures and also undermined New York’s process of reviewing each and every foreclosure case. Homeowners also faced difficulties in accessing mortgage-related documents while they were facing foreclosure.

Schneiderman believes that the banks used the system to give out mortgages more quickly and then when they began foreclosure proceedings, abused it to throw out homeowners from their properties without following proper procedures.

The New York Attorney General’s office issued a statement where it explained the charges against the banks. The major charges against the banks and MERS are:

• MERS has filed over 13,000 foreclosure actions against New York homeowners listing itself as the plaintiff, but in many instances, MERS lacked the legal authority to foreclose and did not own or hold the promissory note, despite saying otherwise in court submissions.

• MERS certifying officers, including employees and agents of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo, have repeatedly executed and submitted in court legal documents purporting to assign the mortgage and/or note to the foreclosing party. These documents contain numerous defects, including affirmative misrepresentations of fact, which render them false, deceptive, and/or invalid. These assignments were often automatically generated and “robosigned” by individuals who did not review the underlying property ownership records, confirm the documents’ accuracy, or even read the documents. These false and defective assignments often masked gaps in the chain of title and the foreclosing party’s inability to establish its authority to foreclose, and as a result have misled homeowners and the courts.

• MERS’ indiscriminate use of non-employee “certifying officers” to execute vital legal documents has confused, misled, and deceived homeowners and the courts and made it difficult to ascertain whether a party actually has the right to foreclose. MERS certifying officers have regularly executed and submitted in court mortgage assignments and other legal documents on behalf of MERS without disclosing that they are not MERS employees, but instead are employed by other entities, such as the mortgage servicer filing the case or its counsel. The signature line just indicates that the individual is an “Assistant Secretary,” “Vice President,” or other officer of MERS. Indeed, these documents often purport to assign the mortgage to the certifying officer’s own employer. Moreover, as a result of the defendants’ failure to track the designation of certifying officers and the scope of their authority to act, individuals have executed legal documents on behalf of MERS, such as mortgage assignments and loan modifications, when they were either not designated as a MERS certifying officer at the time or were not authorized to execute documents on behalf of MERS with respect to the subject loan.

• MERS and its members have deceived and misled borrowers about the importance and ramifications of MERS’ role with respect to their loan by providing inadequate disclosures.

• The MERS System is riddled with inaccuracies which make it difficult to verify the chain of title for a loan or the current note-holder, and creates confusion among stakeholders who rely on the information. In addition, as a result of these inaccuracies, MERS has filed mortgage satisfactions against the wrong property.

• Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Adds Five Partners to NY Acquisition Finance Practice
• Morning Roundup
• New York Firms Revenue Show Slight Hike, Research Reveals
• Weitz & Luxenberg Made Large Contribution to Rice
• Morning Roundup

Yesterday the court rejected the SEC’s request to amend the complaint to add an additional count but left open the option to file it separately, and today the SEC did just that. The SEC is alleging that Bank of America should have disclosed Merril’s $4.5 billion loss in October, 2008, and additional losses in November to its shareholders prior to voting on the merger.

The trial for the original complaint is set to begin in March, and the second trial may start as soon as this summer.

• Court Denies SEC Attempt to Broaden Charges Against BofA
• Morning Roundup
• DLA Piper Announces Launch of New International Securities Group, Along With New Partner
• Former Nixon Peabody Partner Sues Firm, Alleging He Was Made Scapegoat in SEC Investigation
• SEC Veteran Brigagliano Joins Sidley Austin

Thomas Russo has been offered the GC job at AIG…

A court in New York has rejected the SEC’s attempt to broaden its case against B of A…

Another 2100 legal jobs were lost in December, according to the BLS…

The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked broadcasts of the proposition 8 trial…

and Latham & Watkins is opening an office in Houston…

• Morning Roundup
• Morning Roundup
• Morning Roundup
• Morning Roundup
• Morning Roundup

The bank’s lawyers are being required to reapply for their own jobs, which is invariably a precursor to cuts.

Bank of America, based in Charlotte, North Carolina is the largest financial services company in the world, largest bank by assets, and second largest commercial bank by deposits. It serves clients in more than 150 countries and has a relationship with 99 percent of the US Fortune 500 companies and 83 percent of the Fortune Global 500.

The bank plunged in market value after its purchase of Merrill Lynch.

• In-House Attorneys Hit With Layoffs
• Morning Roundup
• Bank of America Accused of Being Bank of Men
• New Charges Filed against Bank of America
• Morning Roundup