<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JD Journal &#187; appellate law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/appellate-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gowdy Wins Landmark Supreme Court Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/18/gowdy-wins-landmark-supreme-court-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/18/gowdy-wins-landmark-supreme-court-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 15:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruel and unusual punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eigth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacksonville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacksonville daily record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mills creed & gowdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=23512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan Gowdy, of the Jacksonville appellate firm Mills Creed &#38; Gowdy, earned a victory yesterday when the US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision regarding the Eighth Amendment in Graham v. Florida, reports the Jacksonville Daily Record.   Terrance Graham, a juvenile when he committed armed burglary seven years ago, violated his parole by committing other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lawbooks_160x120.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-3210" src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lawbooks_160x120-150x120.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="120" /></a>Bryan Gowdy, of the Jacksonville appellate firm <a href="http://www.appellate-firm.com/Index.htm">Mills Creed &amp; Gowdy</a>, earned a victory yesterday when the US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision regarding the Eighth Amendment in <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Graham v. Florida</span>, reports the <a href="http://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/showstory.php?Story_id=531019">Jacksonville Daily Record</a>.   Terrance Graham, a juvenile when he committed armed burglary seven years ago, violated his parole by committing other crimes, and was subsequently handed a life sentence without the possibility of parole.</p>
<p>The Eighth Amendment, which reads “[e]xcessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” in its terseness and ambiguity has long been the subject of mixed interpretation for the courts.  In a 2005 decision in <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Roper v. Simmons</span>, the Supreme Court ruled that minors should be held to a different standard due to their lack of maturity, the inability to often understand the consequences of their actions and far lower rate of recidivism, but this was only applied to cases that involved the death penalty.</p>
<p>In this particular instance, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Graham</span> challenged that interpretation, arguing that the courts had the power to invalidate other types of sentences – that, in essence, a life sentence without the option of parole was cruel and unusual – based on very same factors considered in Roper.   According to Daily Record, the case will most likely make its way back to Florida’s Fourth Circuit, before the same judge that originally sentenced Terrance, due that judge’s familiarity with the underlying facts and evidence presented in the case.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/19/morning-roundup-126/" title="Morning Roundup">Morning Roundup</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/02/01/florida-interstate-75-pileup-kills-10/" title="Florida Interstate 75 Pileup Kills 10">Florida Interstate 75 Pileup Kills 10</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/01/05/security-system-salesman-rapes-woman-in-her-home/" title="Security System Salesman Rapes Woman in Her Home">Security System Salesman Rapes Woman in Her Home</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/12/12/the-john-marshall-law-school-launches-new-law-school-in-savannah/" title="The John Marshall Law School Launches New Law School in Savannah">The John Marshall Law School Launches New Law School in Savannah</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2011/11/14/the-supreme-court-decides-the-constitutionality-of-obamacare/" title="The Supreme Court Decides the Constitutionality of Obamacare   ">The Supreme Court Decides the Constitutionality of Obamacare   </a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2010/05/18/gowdy-wins-landmark-supreme-court-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lakin Law Firm Renamed In Wake of Drug Scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/05/lakin-law-firm-renamed-in-wake-of-drug-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/05/lakin-law-firm-renamed-in-wake-of-drug-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Lakin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Chapman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug dealers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakin Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LakinChapman LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing home abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroad law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Lakin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lakin Law Firm has been renamed LakinChapman LLC, and former Appellate Court Judge Charles Chapman will join Brad Lakin as a named minority partner in the Wood River, Illinois firm. Chapman, 66, was a Madison County circuit judge from 1979 to 1988, when he has elected to the 5th District Appellate Court in Mount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jdjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tomlakin_175x233.jpg" alt="Tom Lakin (left) with his lawyer, who appears to be Rob Riggle of the Daily Show." align="right" />The <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/lakin-law-firm/" target="_self">Lakin Law Firm</a> has been renamed <a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/tag/lakinchapman-llc/" target="_self">LakinChapman LLC</a>, and former Appellate Court Judge Charles Chapman will join Brad Lakin as a named minority partner in the Wood River, Illinois firm.</p>
<p>Chapman, 66, was a Madison County circuit judge from 1979 to 1988, when he has elected to the 5th District Appellate Court in Mount Vernon.</p>
<p>Following his retirement from the bench in 2001, Chapman has been engaged in a trial practice as an attorney associated with the Lakin Law Firm.</p>
<p>The firm will be divided into seven practice areas: maritime law, railroad law, class action, nursing home abuse, workers compensation, personal injury and appellate law.</p>
<p>In October, Tom Lakin, founder of the Lakin Law Firm, was sentenced to six years in prison for drug charges. Lakin pleaded guilty to drug charges of possession with the intent to deliver cocaine, distributing cocaine to a person under 21 and maintaining a drug house.</p>
<div  class="related_post_title">Related Posts:</div><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/05/ex-associate-sues-lakinchapman-over-employment-practices/" title="Ex-Associate Sues LakinChapman Over Employment Practices">Ex-Associate Sues LakinChapman Over Employment Practices</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/05/11/lakinchapman-lawyers-leave-to-found-new-firm/" title="LakinChapman Lawyers Leave to Found New Firm">LakinChapman Lawyers Leave to Found New Firm</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/02/05/gibson-behman-opens-st-croix-office/" title="Gibson &#038; Behman Opens St. Croix Office">Gibson &#038; Behman Opens St. Croix Office</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/30/maryland-law-firms-merge/" title="Maryland Law Firms Merge">Maryland Law Firms Merge</a></li><li><a href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/22/chicago-forgets-to-fire-law-firm/" title="Chicago Forgets to Fire Law Firm">Chicago Forgets to Fire Law Firm</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/01/05/lakin-law-firm-renamed-in-wake-of-drug-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

