Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Popeyes Shift Manager Fired for Allowing Gunman to Take $400
Popeyes Shift Manager Fired for Allowing Gunman to Take $400
Uber Sued for Refusing to Taxi Guide Dogs of the Blind
Uber Sued for Refusing to Taxi Guide Dogs of the Blind
Comcast and Time Warner to Discuss Merger with Department of Justice
Comcast and Time Warner to Discuss Merger with Department of Justice
Upon Net Neutrality Rules Being Published, Legal Challenge Filed
Upon Net Neutrality Rules Being Published, Legal Challenge Filed
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

JinkoSolar Holding Co Lawsuit to Proceed View Count: 321

JinkoSolar

A shareholder lawsuit against JinkoSolar Holding Co will continue based on a ruling from a U.S. appeals court, according to Reuters.

The company makes solar panels and is from China. The lawsuit was filed due to claims that the company concealed the fact that one of its factories was dumping toxic waste into a river.

The ruling came from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The ruling overturned a ruling from a lower court in January of 2013. The lower court dismissed the case filed against JinkoSolar and the company’s underwriters. The lawsuit was sent back to U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




According to the ruling from the appeals court, the company’s failure to disclose “ongoing, serious pollution problems” in two stock offering prospectuses from 2010 “rendered misleading” statements regarding its efforts to comply with environmental laws in China.

In the May 2010 prospectus for the company’s initial public offering, JinkoSolar said that it installed equipment to lower pollution. The company also said that it hired environmental monitoring teams to make sure the company was complying with Chinese standards.

Circuit Judge Ralph Winter wrote the opinion for a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel. He said the following:

“These descriptions did not guarantee 100% compliance 100% of the time. Such compliance may often be unobtainable, and reasonable investors may be deemed to know that. However, investors would be misled … if in fact the equipment and 24-hour team were then failing to prevent substantial violations of the Chinese regulations.”

JinkoSolar Holding Co Lawsuit to Proceed by

Tagged: , ,

Posted by on July 31, 2014. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Paralegal
USA-TX-San Antonio
Fantastic opportunity to handle sophisticated commercial real estate transactions covering the buying, selling, developing, and leasing of raw land, established developments, and related commercial re...


Apply now

Related Posts: