Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
International Attorney Jobs: International Legal Jobs for Americans
International Attorney Jobs: International Legal Jobs for Americans
Defendant Eats His Own Feces During His Trial Testimony
Defendant Eats His Own Feces During His Trial Testimony
7 Must Read Books about the Legal Profession
7 Must Read Books about the Legal Profession
NFL Star Sharper Pleads Guilty to Drugging and Raping Various Women
NFL Star Sharper Pleads Guilty to Drugging and Raping Various Women
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

Ruling Issued in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency View Count: 301

EPA

The Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency(“UARG”). The opinion was written by justice Antonin Scalia and was a 7-2 vote. Scalia was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Anthony Kennedy and the four progressive justices on the bench.

The court ruled that the EPA is allowed to regulate the greenhouse gas emissions of ‘major emitting facilities’ that already were required to have a permit under the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration program, according to Grist.

EPA calculations shows that the reading of the statute accounts for 83 percent of stationary sources of greenhouse emissions in the country. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli fought for this position hard in the brief filed by the government and it drew the most attention during oral arguments earlier in 2014.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




In the same ruling, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the Clean Air Act does not compel nor permit the EPA to adopt interpretations of the act. Stationary sources that emit 100 to 250 tons per year of any air pollutant are required to obtain permits prior to being built or renovated under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program.

Various industries declared victory in this case on Monday, but it seems as though environmentalists groups received the biggest win with the decision of the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Rules in Greenhouse-Gas Case by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on June 25, 2014. Filed under Breaking News,Legal News,Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Family Law Paralegals
USA-FL-West Palm Beach
Greenstein & Associates, a mid-sized law firm in Palm Beach County, seeks an experienced Family Law Paralegal with a background handling contested and uncontested dissolution, custody and support...


Apply now

Related Posts: