Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Hillary Worker Violates Election Law with Trump Meme
Hillary Worker Violates Election Law with Trump Meme
Anti-Paparazzi Law Upheld In Justin Bieber Case
Anti-Paparazzi Law Upheld In Justin Bieber Case
Olsen Twins Fight “Groundless” Suit from Ex-Interns
Olsen Twins Fight “Groundless” Suit from Ex-Interns
The Scoop
The Scoop
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

The U.S. Justice Department’s Use of Cell Phone Tracking View Count: 167

An appeals court ruled in a privacy-rights case, that the U.S. Justice Department’s use of cell-phone tracking in prosecutions that do not end in a conviction, according to Bloomberg News, need not be disclosed to a civil rights group attacking the practice.


 job title, keywords


 city, state, zip

The American Civil Liberties Union sued under the Freedom of Information Act for records that included case names and docket numbers of prosecutions in which the government obtained tracking data without having a warrant. The ACLU and other groups have argued that such data collection violates privacy rights, while government officials have said that the data helps to combat terrorism.

ACLU Legal Director Arthur Spitzer said in a telephone interview, that “We want to find out how the government is using cellphones as tracking devices.” Spitzer said according to Bloomberg News that, “The government was doing this without getting a warrant.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Many law enforcement agencies track cell phones quite frequently. For example, based on invoices from cell phone companies, it appears that Raleigh, N.C. tracks hundreds of cell phones a year. According to the ACLU, the practice is so common that cell phone companies have manuals for police explaining what data the companies store, how much they charge police to access that data, and what officers need to do to get it.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington said in a 2-1 ruling that according to Bloomberg News, “The government, having brought the full force of its prosecutorial power to bear against individuals it ultimately failed to prove actually committed crimes, has a special responsibility — a responsibility it is fulfilling here — to protect such individuals from further public scrutiny.” Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown has said that technological advances make true privacy virtually impossible. The U.S. Court of Appeals also said that disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,” according to Bloomberg News.

Image credit:

The U.S. Justice Department’s Use of Cell Phone Tracking by

Tagged: ,

Jaan Posted by on May 12, 2014. Filed under Home,Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.



Related Posts: