1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
Cell Phones, Tablets Will Not be Admissible in Aaron Hernandez’s Murder Trial
Cell Phones, Tablets Will Not be Admissible in Aaron Hernandez’s...
Former Cyber Security Head of Health and Human Services Convicted of Child Porn Enterprise
Former Cyber Security Head of Health and Human Services Convicted of C...
Advocates of Gay Marriage Bans Take Heat from Judges During Arguments in Appellate Court
Advocates of Gay Marriage Bans Take Heat from Judges During Arguments ...
Lawyer Attempts to Hire a Hitman in Exchange for Reduced Fees
Lawyer Attempts to Hire a Hitman in Exchange for Reduced Fees
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

Judge Removed from Case for Use of Facebook

Judges were warned in February of 2013 by the American Bar Association to be careful when using social media websites. The ABA did not care if judges used the sites to stay in touch with the world, but did warn them against ‘liking,’ ‘friending,’ or ‘following’ someone, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Now, a case out of Florida has arisen involving this exact topic. A circuit court judge presided over divorce proceedings, but before entering the final ruling, the judge sent a ‘friend’ request to the wife on Facebook. The judge is Linda D. Schoonover.

Court documents state that the woman did not accept the request. The lawyer for the woman claims that the judge retaliated against her for not accepting the request. The complaint says that the judge gave the wife “most of the marital debt” and giving the husband “a disproportionately excessive alimony award.”

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


The judge was removed from the case by an appellate court last week. The case was then assigned to a different judge. The appellate court ruled that the wife had a “well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial.”

The ruling was issued by the appeals court on January 24 and it stated that the request on Facebook “placed the litigant between the proverbial rock and a hard place: either engage in improper ex parte communications with the judge presiding over the case or risk offending the judge by not accepting the ‘friend’ request.”

Judge Removed from Case for Use of Facebook by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on January 28, 2014. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...