North Carolina Gives up the Fight Against Same-Sex Marriages
North Carolina Gives up the Fight Against Same-Sex Marriages
Courts Rule Cross will Stay in World Trade Center Museum
Courts Rule Cross will Stay in World Trade Center Museum
Miama-Dade County Ends Same-Sex Marriage Ban
Miama-Dade County Ends Same-Sex Marriage Ban
Washington DC Handgun Ban Judged Unconstitutional
Washington DC Handgun Ban Judged Unconstitutional
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

NY Court of Appeals Says “Too Intoxicated” No Defense to Murder by Reckless Driving

The New York Court of Appeals upheld three murder convictions on Thursday rejecting in each case that being “too intoxicated” to know the threat was a defense to causing murder by acting with “depraved indifference to human life.”

In the instant cases of intoxicated driving, one driver, Taylor, took Ecstasy, marijuana and beer and drove naked down Staten Island’s Forest Avenue, killing a pedestrian. While those in dissent commented she was obviously “mentally impaired,” the majority held it did not grant a license to kill.

In the other cases, Heidgen was so drunk that he drove his truck for miles along the wrong way on Long Island’s Meadowbrook State Parkway and ultimately hit a limousine, killing the driver and a 7-year-old. Five other people suffered injuries.

McPherson was similarly drunk while hitting a vehicle on a Long Island parkway.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman wrote, “Although intoxicated driving cases that present circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life are likely to be few and far between, we find that the evidence in each of these unusually egregious cases was legally sufficient to support the convictions.”

Commenting further, Lippman said, “One who engages in what amounts to a high-speed game of chicken, with complete disregard for the value of the lives that are thereby endangered, is undoubtedly an individual whose culpability is the equivalent of an intentional murderer.”

However, those in dissent held that in case of a murder conviction, there should be a “culpable mental state” and other elements like motive that distinguish a murder from manslaughter.

These murder convictions would be classic illustrations of “utilitarian examples” established more to deter others than for the sake of punishing the guilty.

Did you like this? Share it:
NY Court of Appeals Says “Too Intoxicated” No Defense to Murder by Reckless Driving by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on November 24, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Capital Markets Counsel 3 Attorney
USA-NC-Charlotte

Wells Fargo & Company, a diversified financial services company, is seeking an experienced capital markets Attorney to join its Law Department in its Charlotte, NC office. The individual selected...