Miama-Dade County Ends Same-Sex Marriage Ban
Miama-Dade County Ends Same-Sex Marriage Ban
Washington DC Handgun Ban Judged Unconstitutional
Washington DC Handgun Ban Judged Unconstitutional
Murder of Retired Jersey City Police Officer Finally Solved
Murder of Retired Jersey City Police Officer Finally Solved
FBI Investigating Listening Devices Found in Ford Company Offices
FBI Investigating Listening Devices Found in Ford Company Offices
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

Australia Rules that Sex Injuries are Not Compensable

Australia has ruled that work insurance is not responsible for injuries resulting from recreational sex. One Australian government employee, a woman who experienced such an injury in her late 30s, sought compensation from Comcare for her mishap, and when she was denied, made the matter legal. She was denied reimbursement for injuries in the first ruling, but had this overturned in a subsequent appeal’s court in 2012. The matter has finally been settled today at the High Court of Australia, which said that since she was not encouraged by her employer to have sex, the injury is not work-related.

This is a “victory for common sense,” as Minister for Employment Eric Abetz said, and as reported by Bloomberg. “Instances such as this where an employee seeks to stretch the boundaries of entitlements are of great concern.”

How much stretching the woman did is uncertain, but the nature of her injury, which you must be wondering about right now, concerned her visit to New South Wales in 2007 to observe a budget review. She met an old friend, chatting led to dinner, dinner led to a motel, and the motel lead to sex, at which point a glass fitting overhead fell from its mount and smashed her face, busting her nose, mouth, and causing, as she says, psychological injuries. She was taken to a hospital after the incident.

“The circumstances in which the employee was injured must be connected to an inducement or encouragement by the employer,” said the court’s majority in their summary statement. Since this woman took it on herself to ignite an old flame, it has nothing much to do with her work, and so does not qualify for Comcare reimbursement.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


The high court therefore, in the case of Comcare v. PVYW. 2013/HCA41, ruled in favor of Comcare, and the woman has to pay for her own sex-related injuries.

Did you like this? Share it:
Australia Rules that Sex Injuries are Not Compensable by

Tagged: , , , , ,

Daniel June Posted by on October 30, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • Jeffrey Wilens

    duh.

 

 

Job of the Day
Capital Markets Counsel 3 Attorney
USA-NC-Charlotte

Wells Fargo & Company, a diversified financial services company, is seeking an experienced capital markets Attorney to join its Law Department in its Charlotte, NC office. The individual selected...