Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Colorado Supreme Court to Decide Whether Marijuana Use is Lawful
Colorado Supreme Court to Decide Whether Marijuana Use is Lawful
Animal Cruelty Now Felony According to FBI
Animal Cruelty Now Felony According to FBI
Legal Spending Across the Globe Increased in 2013
Legal Spending Across the Globe Increased in 2013
Court Dismisses Lawsuits Filed Against Chicago-Area Law Schools
Court Dismisses Lawsuits Filed Against Chicago-Area Law Schools
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Legal Job Listings

Crowdfunding Rights of the Public in the Manning Trial

Last week, a little turn of events in Bradley Manning’s trial was missed by many, given the hype generated by the leak of NSA surveillance. However, what happened at Bradley Manning’s trial may be very significant for the public and those who assert their right to information.

In short, the court and the prosecutor at Manning’s trial allowed the presence of two public stenographers crowdfunded by the Freedom of Press Foundation to transcribe the trial. Though it did not happen without its fair share of drama, this small incident is a big victory for freedom of information.

On June 4, Boing Boing first reported that the prosecutor and the court at Manning’s trial did not object to the presence of the stenographers and indicated they could continue. This was important for the freedom of journalism as the military court does not allow any audio or video recording or transmission.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


On the very first day of the trial, the Freedom of Press Foundation submitted their letter requesting the Military District of Washington to “issue two press passes to allow professional court stenographers access to the media room.”

The letter by FPF was signed on to by media organizations including the Los Angeles Times, McClatchy Newspapers, the New York Times, Bloomberg News and others. The letter asserted that if the stenographers were denied access then the public would not be able to “understand the process and decisions made by this court.”

The stenographers did not receive access initially and in reaction Forbes, The Guardian and the Verge applied for an extra slot, so they could give their credentials to the stenographers. Their application was denied.

On Monday, this week, the defense said the military would be issuing “access passes” and not full press credentials to the stenographers.

Judge Army Col. Denise Lind said that court-martials were not meant to “provide contemporaneous access to a transcript.” However, she later recognized that the production of an unofficial transcript would “further Manning’s right to a Sixth Amendment trial and further public’s First Amendment right.”

While even the Guantanamo Military Commission is providing transcripts, in the case of Manning’s trial, until now, the authorities are not known to have arranged for keeping transcripts beyond audio recordings – which are usually unavailable.

Of course, where there is transparency, leaks are meaningless – and it is great to see the American public asserting their right to information by crowdfunding the stenographers at Manning’s trial.

Crowdfunding Rights of the Public in the Manning Trial by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on June 12, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Corporate Counsel, Mergers & Acquisitions
USA-NY-New York City

Our client, a worldwide tech company, is looking to add a corporate m&a associate counsel with 5-8 years of experience to their in-house legal team. This candidate should have experience wit...