Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Michael Kail Sued by Netflix for Reported Kickbacks
Michael Kail Sued by Netflix for Reported Kickbacks
Walmart Still Fighting Fine from Death of Employee on Black Friday
Walmart Still Fighting Fine from Death of Employee on Black Friday
IRS Sued by Microsoft for Details about Contract with Law Firm
IRS Sued by Microsoft for Details about Contract with Law Firm
Lawsuit Claims Sephora Discriminated Against Customers of Asian Descent
Lawsuit Claims Sephora Discriminated Against Customers of Asian Descen...
Legal Job Listings

InterDigital Gets a Second Chance at ITC With Patent Case Against LG

Though the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled that a patent dispute between two phone technology companies should be decided in arbitration, an appeals court said it’s not so. The dispute between InterDigital Communications Corp and LG concerns patent disputes over 3G products – wireless technology – and the case has been going back and forth between courts. One major contention is whether the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals had the right to say anything about the ITC and its ruling that the dispute be decided in arbitration. LG and the ITC say it has no jurisdiction to hear the case, but the Federal Circuit court disagrees, and has won the day on that account: the dispute about clauses in their agreement will instead be held again, and by ITC.

Why the ITC? InterDigital may prefer such a venue because they can block imports of infringing products to the U.S. That has been a tactic of InterDigital as they have taken on several companies for patent disputes, including Nokia Inc, who has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court that as a foreign company they should not have to appear before the ITC. The Supreme Court has not decided whether they will hear this case.

Circuit Judge Sharon Prost wrote for the majority that LG and ITC were “overly restrictive” in their view of the appellate court’s jurisdiction, as reported by Reuters. She also claimed that the ITC judge had ended proceedings without assessing if LG’s claim for license arbitration “was at least plausible,” and instead found that LG’s assertion was “wholly groundless” because the clause did not apply to the technology in question.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The tactic seems to be stacking the courts against each other, only to send the case back to ITC to get them to do their job right.

This case is InterDigital Communications v. International Trade Commission, U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit, No. 12-1628.

InterDigital Gets a Second Chance at ITC With Patent Case Against LG by

Tagged: , , , ,

Daniel June Posted by on June 11, 2013. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Public Finance Associate
USA-NY-Rochester

Harter Secrest & Emery LLP seeks an attorney with 2+ years public finance experience (either as a bond lawyer or as a Section 103 tax lawyer). Enthusiasm for client service and initiative are essentia...

Related Posts: