Samsung Argues over Inflated Patent Damages
Samsung Argues over Inflated Patent Damages
Former Deutsche Bank Salesman Admitted to Bribery
Former Deutsche Bank Salesman Admitted to Bribery
U.S. High Court Upholds Michigan Affirmative Action Ban
U.S. High Court Upholds Michigan Affirmative Action Ban
Supreme Court Rules Michigan Affirmative Ban is Constitutional
Supreme Court Rules Michigan Affirmative Ban is Constitutional
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

Supreme Court to Hear Case About Public Prayers

 

The Supreme Court announced this Monday that they will try another religious concern, this time the use of prayers to open public meetings. They will review an appeals ruling that claims the small town of upstate New York, Greece, violated the Constitution not in opening their town meetings with prayers, but for having the leaders of prayers be consistently Christian for nearly 11 years.

 

Indeed, it seems that all but four of the opening prayers have been Christian. In 2008, four of the twelve meetings were opened with non-Christian prayers, including a prayer by a Jewish layman, a Wiccan priestess, and a member of the Baha’i.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


 

The case against the town is being lead by those non-Christians who feel marginalized by the predominantly Christian prayers. But then again, they are more or less marginal in the literal sense: the small town of 100,000 people chooses the laymen who will lead in prayer from the local publication of churches – and there are no non-Christian places of worship in the town. The appeals court said they should have looked outside their town for non-Christian places of worship.

 

The non-Christian town residents will be presented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, while the town will be represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, whose senior counsel, David Cortman, claims the framers of the Constitution prayed during the drafting of the Bill of Rights, and, as the Washington Post reports, “Americans today should be as free as the Founders were to pray.”

 

However, it is not a matter of being free to pray, necessarily, but what faith gets to choose the prayer – something more of an issue now than it was for the Founding Fathers. It has already been established that the opening prayers are constitutional “so long as the government does not act with improper motive in selecting prayer-givers.”

 

That will be determined this fall. The case is Town of Greece v. Galloway, 12-696.

Did you like this? Share it:
Supreme Court to Hear Case About Public Prayers by

Tagged: , , ,

Daniel June Posted by on May 20, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.