1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
Court Panel Rules Lawsuit Can Proceed Against JinkoSolar
Court Panel Rules Lawsuit Can Proceed Against JinkoSolar
Court of Appeals Vacates Workplace Threat
Court of Appeals Vacates Workplace Threat
Pregnancy Leads to Firing of Hobby Lobby Employee
Pregnancy Leads to Firing of Hobby Lobby Employee
Zillow Merges with Trulia for $3.5 Billion
Zillow Merges with Trulia for $3.5 Billion
Job Listings

Martha Stewart Living and J.C. Penney Continue to Battle over Right to Sell Goods

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Everybody wants a piece of Martha Stewart. That’s why two retail giants are going to war over the rights to sell goods emblazoned with her name and image. In the latest battle for the rights to merchandize the lifestyle icon, J.C. Penney won a key victory over Macy’s to determine who can sell Martha Stewart goods.

In 2006, Macy’s signed a contract with Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia to produce, package, market and sell Martha Stewart Living branded goods at all of their retail outlets. The contract’s terms extend to 2018, and Macy’s claims that it gives them the exclusive rights to the Martha Stewart name in certain categories like bedding, bath and tableware.

Unbeknownst to Macy’s, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia also signed an agreement with Macy’s competitor J.C. Penney to create Martha Stewart branded stores within J.C. Penney outlets across the country. Once Macy’s got wind of this deal, they promptly took legal action, successfully prohibiting J.C. Penney from selling any of the $100 million in inventory they had already purchased for the Martha Stewart initiative.

The latest decision, which was reported by Reuters, puts J.C. Penney in a position to sell that merchandise as long as it wasn’t branded as Martha Steward Living. Barring any appeals, of which many can be expected, unbranded Martha Stewart merchandise can indeed be sold by J.C. Penney under the label “JCP Everyday.” But don’t rush out to a local shopping mall in search of Martha Stewart-affiliated tea candles or lemonade pitchers just yet, as Macy’s has already announced their intention to appeal Justice Jeffrey Oing’s decision.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Since the decision, Macy’s has decried Oing’s ruling, saying that the judge “erred in several significant respects.”

It may seem like risky business for J.C. Penney to sign a spokesperson that is already engaged in a long-term, exclusive contract with a rival company, but J.C. Penney has been no stranger to risky moves in the last few years. Their former CEO, Ron Johnson, has been making aggressive and unusual business moves, including the deal with Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, which was worth it in the short term, but not in the long term. Johnson was ousted from the company last week.

Oing is also overseeing a dispute between Macy’s and Martha Stewart Omnimedia which will determine if Stewart’s company breached its contract with Macy’s by signing the deal with J.C. Penney.

  • TJRB

    Here is another example of how Ronnie the HiPPO does business, same way as “poor people don’t wash their clothes as often as rich people”, she proved them wrong Stewart via of supplying Kmat with light color towels and sheets. Yes, if you have stepped in a Kmart you are poor and dirty but you have her “amazing products”. Google the trial notes. That old bat is a crazy as Hippo Ron.

    Get into to designer bed with Ronnie, Ronnie will Ron Jonhson you it would seems.

    Can you say entitled as in entitlement.

    I am not sure why any vendor would want to do business with JCP yet alone shoppers. We will not be back.

Martha Stewart Living and J.C. Penney Continue to Battle over Right to Sell Goods by
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Tagged: , , , ,

Andrew Ostler Posted by on April 16, 2013. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Family Law Paralegal
USA-AZ-Scottsdale

Qualified candidate MUST have: A minimum of 5 years Family Law paralegal experience Be self-motivated with the ability to independently manage cases Have excellent organizational a...